Author |
Message |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 What a weird year this is!
I was re-reading the Oscar noms recently again and realized whaz a truly unusual year this is. I am not just speaking about the singular unusual things, but the fact that all of them happened in the same year.
These are the odd things I have noticed about this year's Oscars:
- No Best Visual Effects nomination for Star Wars - the very first Star Wars flick not to get one. Yet, it got a make-up nom.
- Only three Best Song nominees for the first time in over a decade
- There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years
- The movie with the highest number of nominations received only 8 noms
- The Best Picture frontrunner received no Best Editing nomination for the first time in 25 years
- Only two Best Picture nominees received Editing noms
- The Best Director and Best Picture nominations matched 5/5 for the first time in 25 years
- Only two of the Best Picture nominees were nominated for Best Picture at the Golden Globes
- Only three of the Best Director nominees were nominated for Best Director at the Golden Globes
- A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations
- 14 of the acting nominees are first-time nominees
- The Academy went for quality and not huge commercial success in the Best Animated Picture categry, by nominating Howl's Moving Castle
- By the time of the nominees announcement not a single Best Picture nominee made $60+ million
Feel free to add your odd trivia
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:32 pm |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Two of the three highest grossing imports were not nominated in any way shape or form (Downfall, contrary to everyone's opinion, doesn't count, as it was actually nominated last year).
North Country, 'nuff said.
2 of the five BP noms are shot in Black and White (to some extent), as well.
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:36 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
dolcevita wrote: Two of the three highest grossing imports were not nominated in any way shape or form (Downfall, contrary to everyone's opinion, doesn't count, as it was actually nominated last year).
North Country, 'nuff said.
2 of the five BP noms are shot in Black and White (to some extent), as well.
Two? Which is the other one? (other than GNGL)
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:37 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: What a weird year this is!
Dr. Lecter wrote: - A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations
Which one?
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:39 pm |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Two? Which is the other one? (other than GNGL)
Capote is shot half in Black and White, and the other half in "cold" color schema. They're woven together. Groucho wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: - A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations
Which one?
Geisha
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:40 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
All 5 nominees are nominated for Screenplay. I can't remember the last time that happened.
Oh I found it... 2000.
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:36 pm |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
apparently the 5dir/5pic/5screenplay line up has only happened once or twice or something, though. (I read that somewhere)
|
Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:28 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
 Re: What a weird year this is!
Dr. Lecter wrote: - There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years
Actually, unless I missed something, I think you have to go back to 1948 for that.
|
Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:24 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: What a weird year this is!
Chris wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: - There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years
Actually, unless I missed something, I think you have to go back to 1948 for that.
Wow...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:48 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Wait...
The Best Actress category has 3 nominees from the Comedy/Musical Actress Globe category.
Is this like a rare occurence?
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:06 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
You know if Geisha ended up being a better movie it could've easily won best picture this year, I mean it would've atleast been a favor. It had the technical awards under it's belt, it just needed to be a stronger movie and it could've happened.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:20 am |
|
 |
The Scottie
King Albert!
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm Posts: 11838 Location: The Happiest City on Earth
|
You find this interesting (but sad), that in the first time in BO tracking history, every single Best Picture nominee dropped in the per screen averages from the previous weekend in their first post-nod weekend. How sad it that?
_________________Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.  and many more.
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:08 am |
|
 |
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Posts: 5812
|
Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend?
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:17 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40267
|
Killuminati510 wrote: You know if Geisha ended up being a better movie it could've easily won best picture this year, I mean it would've atleast been a favor. It had the technical awards under it's belt, it just needed to be a stronger movie and it could've happened.
I think same goes for All The King's Men if it had stuck around in 2005, I think it would've been a great help to this years weak race.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:28 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
alex young wrote: Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend?
I believe so.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:37 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
xiayun wrote: alex young wrote: Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend? I believe so.
Didn't it happen in 2004 already? I think that's the reason Mystic River increased 30% on that weekend, no?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:44 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Feb 1st Superbowl Jan 27th Nominations (also my 27th birthday, the day ROTK kicked nomination arse)
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:49 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:08 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Is it too early to call this year's BP nominees an embarassment.
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:13 pm |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
ManicForMunich wrote: Is it too early to call this year's BP nominees an embarassment.
There is only one embarrassment on the list. The Oscars have often nominated mediocre/decent films, see Chocolat, but this is the first year where I look to one of the nominees and shake my head.
Munich kicks ass, so at the end of the day 1/5 ain't bad...
|
Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:37 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40267
|
Here's another probable one: Not a single BP nominee will pass 100 million dollars box-office, for the first time since 1985.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:59 pm |
|
|