Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Author |
Message |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Raffiki wrote: I do think that's going to be the line-up and I think it's going to be a race between Slumdog Millionaire and Benjamin Button.
I don't think Milk has a real shot at winning. And Frost/Nixon... meh.
The Dark Knight is going to be the X factor. I'm not sure if it's nomination will be its prize or if it will actually be a contender at this point. I think the guilds will give us the best idea as to how formidable a player it's gonna be.
Benjamin Button is gonna win over all the tech people and most of the old people. Button has quickly taken Australia's spot as the epic romance. Out of the five it most resembles the "academy type" plus it's kinda hip and cool because it has Fincher and Pitt attached. And they obviously love Blanchett and just awarded Swinton last year...
I'm afraid of Slumdog though. The good news is that Slumdog should be nominationless with SAG. I think ROTK is the only other film in the history of the SAG awards that wasn't nominated in any category but went on to get a BP nomination. If it gets in Best Ensemble, then the skies are growing dark. ROTK won Best Ensemble, no? yup, my mistake. Even better odds for a SAG snub for Slumdog. 
|
Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:41 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
However, some films did get BP noms despite SAG snubs:
Atonement Letters from Iwo Jima Munich Master and Commander
And some more.
As far as BP wins go.....hmmm, I'm not sure that ever happened. Not that I can think of.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:01 am |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Period Piece war films (war against terrorism in the case of Munich I guess).
I don't think there's been a film like Slumdog in the race, performing the way its performing since I've followed the Oscars. I don't really know what to compare it to.
|
Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:17 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
da torri wrote: Sam wrote: I know everyone here feels confident that Milk will get best picture. But I am starting to lose that confidence. Both critics and audiences think Sean Penn is great in it, but few think the movie is really the best picture of the year (I of course disagree). Do you all really think Milk is a lock for a best picture nomination at this point? Yeah. This is Capote, but more accessible. It won't win, but the Oscar lineup is out of place without it. Pretty much. It has slightly worse reviews than Capote and less passion behind it, but instead it has a van Sant who has had Good Will Hutning in the past, a more "relevant" theme and it will also end up with more money than Capote.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:49 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
The cool thing about the race at this moment is that no film looks likely to sweep the critics awards like NCFOM and ROTK did in their years and we don't have anyone really badly overdue like Scorsese in 2006, meaning that the BP race is wide open.
Seriously, four films can win it at the moment: Button, TDK, Milk and Slumdog.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:59 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote: However, some films did get BP noms despite SAG snubs:
Atonement Letters from Iwo Jima Munich Master and Commander
And some more.
As far as BP wins go.....hmmm, I'm not sure that ever happened. Not that I can think of. Braveheart, a film as far as I can tell received not a single mention anywhere for its acting. Though it was probably helped among the acting branch by having one of their own at the helm. Still, unlike those movies Slumdog could still get an acting mention at SAG for Patel, if their love for young actors continues (Hell, they nominated Dakota Fanning for I Am Sam).
|
Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:01 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Fur will fly if Clint manages a Best Song win over Springsteen.
Just thought I'd add that.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:10 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
A look at Metacritic:
WALL-E - 93/100, 20 100-scores Slumdog Millionaire - 86/100, 9 100-scores Milk - 84/100, 10 100-scores Happy-Go-Lucky - 84/100, 7 100-scores The Dark Knight - 82/100, 16 100-scores Rachel Getting Married - 82/100, 8 100-scores Frost/Nixon - 79/100, 5 100-scores Gran Torino - 79/100, 0 100-scores Doubt - 67/100, 3 100-scores The Reader - 58/100, 1 100-score
________________________________________________________________________________
Last years for comparison:
2007:
Ratatouille - 96/100, 20 100-scores There Will Be Blood - 92/100, 23 100-scores The Diving Bell and the Butterfly - 92/100, 17 100-scores No Country for Old Men - 91/100, 20 100-scores Atonement - 85/100, 14 100-scores The Bourne Ultimatum - 85/100, 8 100-scores Michael Clayton - 82/100, 3-100 scores Juno - 81/100, 4 100-scores Into the Wild - 73/100, 3 100-scores
2006:
Pan's Labyrinth - 98/100, 26 100-scores The Queen - 91/100, 12 100-scores United 93 - 90/100, 19 100-scores Letters from Iwo Jima - 89/100, 15 100-scores The Departed - 86/100, 13 100-scores Casino Royale - 81/100, 3 100-scores Little Miss Sunshine - 80/100, 4 100-scores Dreamgirls - 76/100, 5 100-scores Cars - 73/100, 5 100-scores Notes on a Scandal - 73/100, 2 100-scores Babel - 69/100, 2 100-scores
2005:
Capote - 88/100, 16 100-scores Brokeback Mountain - 87/100, 17 100-scores King Kong - 81/100, 10 100-scores A History of Violence - 81/100, 6 10-scores Good Night, and Good Luck. - 80/100, 8 100-scores Munich - 74/100, 8 100-scores Walk the Line - 72/100, 2 100-scores Batman Begins - 70/100, 5 100-scores Crash - 69/100, 5 100-scores
2004:
Sideways - 94/100, 24 100-scores The Incredibles - 90/100, 14 100-scores Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind - 89/100, 16 100-scores Million Dollar Baby - 86/100, 22 100-scores Spider-Man 2 - 83/100, 11 100-scores Vera Drake - 83/100, 10 100-scores Hotel Rwanda - 79/100, 4 100-scores The Aviator - 77/100, 6 100-scores Ray - 73/100, 4 100-scores Finding Neverland - 67/100, 2 100-scores Closer - 65/100, 1 100-score
2003:
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King - 94/100, 27 100-scores Lost in Translation - 89/100, 18 100-scores Mystic River - 84/100, 14 100-scores Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World - 81/100, 11 100-scores Monster - 75/100, 1 100-score Cold Mountain - 73/100, 5 100-scores Seabiscuit - 72/100, 3 100-scores House of Sand and Fog - 71/100, 3 100-scores 21 Grams - 70/100, 7 100-scores
____________________________________________________________________________
I still can't fathom how Finding Neverland got itself nominated. It didn't have much passion behind it, it didn't have an "important" theme like Babel or Crash and wasn't strong in the directing or writing department either. Hotel Rwanda or Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind really should have gotten in over it, even if judging by the numbers and the noms.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:46 am |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote: A look at Metacritic:
WALL-E - 93/100, 20 100-scores Slumdog Millionaire - 86/100, 9 100-scores Milk - 84/100, 10 100-scores Happy-Go-Lucky - 84/100, 7 100-scores The Dark Knight - 82/100, 16 100-scores Rachel Getting Married - 82/100, 8 100-scores Frost/Nixon - 79/100, 5 100-scores Gran Torino - 79/100, 0 100-scores Doubt - 67/100, 3 100-scores The Reader - 58/100, 1 100-score
________________________________________________________________________________
Last years for comparison:
2007:
Ratatouille - 96/100, 20 100-scores There Will Be Blood - 92/100, 23 100-scores The Diving Bell and the Butterfly - 92/100, 17 100-scores No Country for Old Men - 91/100, 20 100-scores Atonement - 85/100, 14 100-scores The Bourne Ultimatum - 85/100, 8 100-scores Michael Clayton - 82/100, 3-100 scores Juno - 81/100, 4 100-scores Into the Wild - 73/100, 3 100-scores
What strikes me most isn't how much higher the two Pixar films are ranked over the collective group. It's how stiff the competition was for Ratatouille last year, versus what WALL-E is dealing with this year. It would be a travesty for WALL-E not to get in.
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
It seems there just isn't as much passion behind films this year. Then again, last year was quite a strong year. This year has been kinda weak in comparison. I still don't know what my #1 is. 
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:03 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
GOD DAMNIT CRASH!!! FUCKING DIE!
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:08 pm |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Rotten Tomatoes update. Alot more reviews have come in...
Frost/Nixon: 90% (100-11), 7.6 and 88% COTC
MILK: 93% (133-10), 8.0 and 90% COTC
Slumdog Millionaire: 93% (118-9), 8.1 and 94% COTC
Doubt: 71% (60-25), 6.6 and 71% COTC
Gran Torino: 81% (35-8), 7.0 and 92% COTC
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:34 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Ehh, Gran Torino keeps looking better and better.
Honestly, It is not out of the game completely yet. Its chance is about 2% or so, but it is still there if reviews continue to improve. I mean the Academy loves Eastwood. It could get a directing nod...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:42 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Don't forget!
Wall-E 96% Fresh: 208, Rotten:8 Average Rating: 8.5/10 97% COTC Fresh: 36 Rotten:1 Average Rating: 8.5/10
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:44 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
loyalfromlondon wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: A look at Metacritic:
WALL-E - 93/100, 20 100-scores Slumdog Millionaire - 86/100, 9 100-scores Milk - 84/100, 10 100-scores Happy-Go-Lucky - 84/100, 7 100-scores The Dark Knight - 82/100, 16 100-scores Rachel Getting Married - 82/100, 8 100-scores Frost/Nixon - 79/100, 5 100-scores Gran Torino - 79/100, 0 100-scores Doubt - 67/100, 3 100-scores The Reader - 58/100, 1 100-score
________________________________________________________________________________
Last years for comparison:
2007:
Ratatouille - 96/100, 20 100-scores There Will Be Blood - 92/100, 23 100-scores The Diving Bell and the Butterfly - 92/100, 17 100-scores No Country for Old Men - 91/100, 20 100-scores Atonement - 85/100, 14 100-scores The Bourne Ultimatum - 85/100, 8 100-scores Michael Clayton - 82/100, 3-100 scores Juno - 81/100, 4 100-scores Into the Wild - 73/100, 3 100-scores
What strikes me most isn't how much higher the two Pixar films are ranked over the collective group. It's how stiff the competition was for Ratatouille last year, versus what WALL-E is dealing with this year. It would be a travesty for WALL-E not to get in. Yeah, there's certainly truth to it. Then again, you know what also strikes me when looking at the lists? Pan's Labyrinth is probably the most acclaimed foreign flick of the decade, probably moreso than Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (98/100 at MC!!!) and it actually got six Oscar noms and yet missed out on a BP nom with films like Babel and Little Miss Sunshine (which both had significantly less acclaim and pasion behind them), so... As far as the passion goes, it may be just a hunch, but something tells me that once The Wrestler appears at MC, it will garner a similar kind of passionate reviews as the biggest did last year.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:53 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Dr. Lecter wrote: Ehh, Gran Torino keeps looking better and better.
Honestly, It is not out of the game completely yet. Its chance is about 2% or so, but it is still there if reviews continue to improve. I mean the Academy loves Eastwood. It could get a directing nod... Gran Torino actually makes Crash look like high art. Literally the only reason to see it is for Clint's performance. There's nothing else. I actually think Frost/Nixon stands the biggest chance of missing out the BP, yet getting a BD nod. DGA will obviously clear that up a bit.
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:56 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
loyalfromlondon wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Ehh, Gran Torino keeps looking better and better.
Honestly, It is not out of the game completely yet. Its chance is about 2% or so, but it is still there if reviews continue to improve. I mean the Academy loves Eastwood. It could get a directing nod... Gran Torino actually makes Crash look like high art. Literally the only reason to see it is for Clint's performance. There's nothing else. I actually think Frost/Nixon stands the biggest chance of missing out the BP, yet getting a BD nod. DGA will obviously clear that up a bit. Wha? I'm seeing it exactly the other way around. It has the biggest chance of missing BD, but getting a BP nod. The Wrestler is sitll my top choice for a BD nom without a BP nom.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:00 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Darren isn't going to get a BD nom, if for no other reason it cannot be Nolan, Fincher, Aronofsky, Sant, and Boyle. That's literally too cool for school. The universe will collapse. Howard has to get in to balance things out.
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:26 pm |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Yes. Frost/Nixon will get Director/Adapted Screenplay/Actor/Editing, though.
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:45 pm |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:22 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
I saw Slumdog.
Easily one of the top 10 or 20 motion pictures of the decade.
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:56 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
roo wrote: I saw Slumdog.
Easily one of the top 10 or 20 motion pictures of the decade. 
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:58 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
roo wrote: I saw Slumdog.
Easily one of the top 10 or 20 motion pictures of the decade. Is it better than Michael Clayton?
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:59 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
It's better than almost everything this decade except for maybe...
Moulin Rouge! United 93 Master & Commander Downfall The Two Towers (my favorite LOTR movie) Eternal Sunshine Kill Bill The Fog of War City of God
and a few others.
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:00 pm |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
 Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Roo has given me heavy expectations, if they fail I will kill............Loyal!
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:02 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|