Author |
Message |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Maverikk wrote: An interesting article at Oscarwatch.com. Not sure who she's talking about when she says about "ALL" having egg on their face over Munich, but it wasn't me, as I never gave it much of a chance.
Ya know Maverikk, it might be good to step back every once and a while and realize that you don't need to infuze your great pride of your uber-predicting abilities into every post, and that's what gets everyone so pissed at you.
But I do agree with most of what she's saying, even though I am one of those declaring FOOF a Munich of sorts, something I've felt since it was first announced and everyone was going "Oh, Eastwood is getting another Oscar. . .", but it's more because the academy usually gives directors a breather after a win. This has been true for a while, and is a legit pattern, IMO.
But what the hell do I know?
|
Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:01 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Mood-Swing Jon wrote: Maverikk wrote: An interesting article at Oscarwatch.com. Not sure who she's talking about when she says about "ALL" having egg on their face over Munich, but it wasn't me, as I never gave it much of a chance. Ya know Maverikk, it might be good to step back every once and a while and realize that you don't need to infuze your great pride of your uber-predicting abilities into every post, and that's what gets everyone so pissed at you. You are being reported. Quote: 8. Posting style and behavior: We do not dictate how a person should and should not post a message or where they should post a message. But sometimes, a member?s actions pose a threat to the health of the forums. A word of advice is to be tactful and respectful about how you post. We are all from different places here and have a different way of conversing. We find different things offensive. Joke around with who you know will take a joke. Also learn to take a joke from others. But if a member is purposely found bothering a poster again and again just because you feel they think they have the right to say what they feel like, it will not fly well with the moderators and administrators here. Action will be taken against that member.
|
Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:07 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23250 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Loyal's "I just saw The Prestige" thread has been linked on Oscarwatch.com as "chatter" about the film. 
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:27 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
MadGez wrote: Loyal's "I just saw The Prestige" thread has been linked on Oscarwatch.com as "chatter" about the film. 
Yeah, I emailed Sasha earlier.
I love the Sash.
|
Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:34 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23250 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: MadGez wrote: Loyal's "I just saw The Prestige" thread has been linked on Oscarwatch.com as "chatter" about the film.  Yeah, I emailed Sasha earlier. I love the Sash.
Sasha is damn loveable
I love how the thread was picked up as "chatter" - kind of like it was picked up on a CIA intelligence report!
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:36 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Yeah, I emailed Sasha earlier.
I love the Sash.
Do they know this thread exists over there at Oscarwatch.com? They'd probably enjoy it.
Congrats on the link.
|
Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:38 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Maverikk wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Yeah, I emailed Sasha earlier.
I love the Sash. Do they know this thread exists over there at Oscarwatch.com? They'd probably enjoy it. Congrats on the link.
I owe OW for linking our 72 For You: The Ultimate Oscar Contest on their main page.
|
Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:47 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Updated.
Infamous is up to 50%.
|
Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:50 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Infamous continues to climb toward a fresh rating. It just got another positive review.
|
Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:36 am |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Someone I know is seeing Flags tomorrow. Someone perhaps we all know. 
|
Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:44 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Variety reviews The History Boy:
Quote: By LESLIE FELPERIN
"The History Boys" may please fans of the original legit production and the stragglers who didn't catch it in Gotham or London's West End. However, auds coming cold to this largely faithful adaptation of Alan Bennett's clever but contrived classroom comedy won't be so wowed, given pic's irrevocably stagy feel. Nicholas Hytner's flat-footed direction doesn't help, nor do pic's younger cast members' over-rehearsed perfs, although the seasoned thesps shine. Hard-marketing push and Bennett's name should reap interest from Blighty's chattering classes when it opens in the U.K. on Oct. 13, but "History" may struggle to push beyond sophisticated urban centers upon Stateside release Nov. 22.
Given legit version's success, pic's producers have chosen not to spike the feed of a winning horse. Helmer of the acclaimed "The Madness of King George" (another Bennett script) and three less acclaimed pics (including "The Object of My Affection"), Hytner launched the play at the National Theatre, and remained on board as producer-helmer there, shooting with the original cast during the break between the London and Tony-winning New York theatrical runs.
Although two real high schools (or "grammar schools," in Brit parlance) were used to rep one location, the action has not been opened up very much beyond the stage production's confines. Meanwhile, Bennett's screen adaptation adds only a few minor characters to the mix.
Set -- like a number of other recent British youth-centered movies (such as "This Is England," "Starter for Ten") -- in the early or mid-'80s, pic revolves around various staff and a selection of elite sixth-year (i.e. final-year) students at Cutler's Grammar School, located in Sheffield, a town in the northern county of Yorkshire.
Eight boys -- gay and Jewish Posner (Samuel Barnett), class stud Dakin (Dominic Cooper), portly clown Timms (James Corden), Christian Scripps (Jamie Parker), dim but sporty Rudge (Russell Tovey), badge-wearing Lockwood (Andrew Knott), and quite frankly barely sketched ethnic minorities Crowther (Samuel Anderson) and Akthar (Sacha Dhawan) -- have been chosen for special tutoring in history to help them pass the difficult entrance exams for Oxford and Cambridge.
Cutler's officious headmaster (in other words, a high school principal, played by Clive Merrison), channeling the Zeitgeist of the number-crunching Thatcher era, is fixated on getting as many boys accepted as possible. To this end, he hires young Oxford history graduate Irwin (Stephen Campbell Moore) to teach the boys new techniques that will grab the examiners' attention.
Irwin's methods -- relativist, goal- rather than truth-oriented -- contrast with those of general studies teacher Hector (Richard Griffiths), who favors memorizing literary quotes. Irwin also aims to widen the students' cultural spheres with the poetry of A.E. Housman as well as show tunes and dialogue from Bette Davis movies, none of it terribly relevant to history but fun to riff on in his unstructured classes.
Furtively gay despite the fact that he has a "somewhat unexpected wife," in the words of tart-tongued history teacher Dorothy Lintott (scene-stealer Frances de la Tour), Hector likes to grope the boys' crotches when he gives them rides on his motorcycle, a habit the students' endure. Nevertheless, his wandering hands get him into trouble eventually, creating some third-act drama that seems more pallid on screen than it did onstage.
Indeed, blow-up to the bigscreen makes the material's fault lines look more chasm-like. For instance, Bennett's glittery dialogue may encrust the material with jewel-bright, quotable lines, but it sounds just plain phony in the mouths of the younger characters.
Plus, the younger actors are so used to inhabiting their roles that all the spontaneity has been squeezed out, although a couple (Barnett, Parker) get better results. The more cinematically experienced Griffiths and de la Tour show how it should be done, and cook up their big set piece monologues to perfection.
However, in the end, they nearly all sound like Alan Bennett characters -- and ones who would be more comfortable in the 1950s than the 1980s -- rather than real people. Essentially, they're vehicles to air competing ideas about education, homoerotic desire, and how history is written. All interesting stuff, but it never quite gels as a drama.
Hytner fails to find rhythms that would give the material a proper shape, and when in doubt gets lenser Andrew Dunn to prowl up and down the school corridors as the thesps make frantic entrances and exits.
Tech credits are serviceable but lacking in flair. Pop tunes by the likes of The Clash, The Smiths and Echo and the Bunnymen, the stuff real teenagers were listening to in 1983, are unconvincingly deployed to add period flavor, and seem to counteract the incongruity of youngsters in the plot who like to sing Rogers and Hart's "Bewitched" and Edith Piaf's "L'Accordeoniste."
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:17 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Updated.
Little Children continues to roll.
So does The Departed.
Catch a Fire received a bad review at RT.
Infamous received 1 good and 2 bad since the last update.
24 films are currently being tracked at RT. Only All the King's Men, with a pitiful 11%, has been booted.
Rotten Tomatoes:
[table]
[row][col color=#FF6347] 90-100[col color=#FF6347] 80-89[col color=#FF6347] 70-79[col color=#FF6347] 60-69[col color=#008000] 50-59[col color=#008000] 40-49[col color=#008000] 30-39[col color=#008000] 20-29[col color=#008000] 10-19[col color=#008000] 0-9
[row][col color=#F5DEB3]7[col color=#F5DEB3]9[col color=#F5DEB3]3[col color=#F5DEB3]2[col color=#F5DEB3]2[col color=#F5DEB3]0[col color=#F5DEB3]0[col color=#F5DEB3]0[col color=#F5DEB3]1[col color=#F5DEB3]0[/table]
13 films are currently being tracked with the BFCA. All the King's Men makes 14. To get an idea of the range, Gigli is a 47, Hulk was a 72, The Matrix: Reloaded was an 87? (  This was before the memo was sent out that it wasn't good.) The Passion of the Christ was an 82. Sideways was a 96.
BFCA:
[table]
[row][col color=#8B0000] 90-100[col color=#8B0000] 80-89[col color=#8B0000] 70-79[col color=#8B0000] 60-69[col color=#8B0000] 50-59[col color=#8B0000] 40-49[col color=#8B0000] 30-39[col color=#8B0000] 20-29[col color=#8B0000] 10-19[col color=#8B0000] 0-9
[row][col]7[col]5[col]2[col]0[col]0[col]0[col]0[col]0[col]0[col]0[/table]
There have been 15 films charted at metacritic.
Metacritc:
[table]
[row][col color=#33CC33] 90-100[col color=#33CC33] 80-89[col color=#33CC33] 70-79[col color=#33CC33] 60-69[col color=#FFFF33] 50-59[col color=#FFFF33] 40-49[col color=#FFFF33] 30-39[col color=#FFFF33] 20-29[col color=#FFFF33] 10-19[col color=#FFFF33] 0-9
[row][col color=#483D8B] 2[col color=#483D8B] 3[col color=#483D8B] 4[col color=#483D8B] 4[col color=#483D8B] 1[col color=#483D8B] 0[col color=#483D8B] 1[col color=#483D8B] 0[col color=#483D8B] 0[col color=#483D8B] 0[/table]
|
Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:27 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Flags just got it's 2nd negative.
|
Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:38 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Updated.
Reviews are trickling in for Infamous. Early word is mixed, but it could possibly eek out enough respectibility to mean something. Not looking good, but not hopeless yet.
The Queen continues to roll and still hasn't received it's 2nd bad review.
The Departed rolls on and moves up to 93%.
|
Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:53 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40248
|
Ok, so can we say now that assuming The Good Shepared blows a casket, and barring an MDB like rise out of nowhere for a contender, the movies that can possibly win Best Picture are:
The Departed
Dreamgirls
The Queen
Babel
?
By the way, the reason I think Babel should not be counted out yet:
a) The stars, Pitt and Blanchett are both huge this season. Cate the Great is all over the magazines right now.
b) 2005 was all message movies, and this is the one film this year that is carrying that trend over. Has the academy shaken those cobwebs off? Above all the rest, this is an Oscar plotted movie down to it's bone.
But the biggest one of all IMO, is c) It might be the only alternative.
Let's say The Departed is too bloody and fun like loyal and Kill say.
The Queen is the big critics choice like Sideways, it is getting insane reviews, but it is a British diplomat semi-comedy... It won't make much money, and there are no name draws. As acclaimed as it is, I'm still going to need some serious convincing before I see it having a chance.
And then there's Dreamgirls, which hasn't been screened yet. Will it be a Best Picture like movie, or is it a fun audience pleaser that gets in as the 5th nominee without BD? Or is it this years Walk the Line that loses everything at the last moment? Or even moreso, is it this year's Memoirs of a Geisha as the early feminine frontrunner that gets ripped apart. Noone has seen it yet, so there is all those possibilities. It cannot be banked on for the win yet, it is still up in the air as far as I'm concerned.
So what happens if they all don't win? Babel! The reviews are only 8 and 2 so far, but it is early, and Crash never made it past 78% after all. For now the box-office doesn't look that great, but this is more accesible than Innaritu's past efforts, the gross won't be terrible. The academy may pull out their cunt guns once again, I don't think the movie looks all that special, but I think it is the most possible uber-spoiler of the year. Message over matter, pure Oscar bait after last year, if The Departed loses this could very well be the movie that shits all over it's face.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:44 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40248
|
By the way, couple notes:
Last King of Scotland is up to a very good 91%, though the average is only 7.4 and the metacritic is in the mid 70s. Will need a lot more fresh reviews to get back in the race.
Marie Antoneitte is 80%+, though early(13 and 3). Should be good for a Musical/Comedy nomination, and it should be a lock for costumes, make-up, art direction noms, it'll probably win those too. I think the booing was more of a case of the French hating Marie, over the movie being bad. Still don't see it in the BP race though, barring some magic.
The Queen is 61 fresh and 1 rotten, 98%.  It'll definitley be the critics choice now, guaranteed. Nomination locked up pretty much.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:01 am |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23250 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
The Queen has the benefit of having fewer reviews than say The Departed - hence less CONS - but still an amazing percentage.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:10 am |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Shack wrote: The Queen is 61 fresh and 1 rotten, 98%.  It'll definitley be the critics choice now, guaranteed. Nomination locked up pretty much.
I guess I don't understand how that locks up a nomination.
|
Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:16 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
It's not the 98% fresh that amazes me the most. I could see that it may be a film for people to find faults with, just like The Last King of Scotland, but I also expected the average to be closer to Scotland. An 8.4 scoring average for a film that felt like made-for-TV is beyond anything I could've imagined. 8.3 for The Departed could be understood since it's a film that pumps you up and gets one all excited; understandable for United 93 too with the raw emotion it generates; but for The Queen, a film that on paper should be easy to respect but harder to fall in deep love, wow. In fact, the grade has gone up 0.1-0.2 since the first week. And 62 reviews are not a small sample size. The metacritic and BFCA scores just reiterate the universal love. After Toronto, if I were shown the respective scores of all the sites for The Queen and The Last King of Scotland without their names attached, I'd have surely them reversed.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:13 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
The Queen is now at 99% with 69 reviews in, and the average goes up again, to 8.5.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:06 am |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
every time someone posts on the Queen I think "that's fucking insane" and wonder really, honestly, how far can it go? it's just illogical to me that a film could be so universally praised.
|
Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:09 am |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23250 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Well we know it cant get to 100%
I seriously doubt The Queen could be THAT good. Maybe Mirren rips her clothes off and pole dances to God save the Queen, who knows?
Now i really want to see it though. 
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:13 am |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
Maybe it's the surprise ending. 
|
Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:16 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
The reviews for Infamous are actually decent (I was expecting around 50% fresh). Not a BP contender, but still in contention for supporting actress, I think.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:16 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Infamous has climbed to respectability. It's amazing that only All the King's Men has flopped, so far.
The Queen just continues to impress. Is it ever going to get it's 2nd negative review?
Little Children has climbed all the way to a strong 86%.
I'll be damned if Last King isn't cementing itself a score of over 90%.
Marie Antoinette continues to quietly add positive reviews.
Volver got it's 3rd negative.
|
Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:46 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|