| Author |
Message |
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
|
Oscar.com has it both ways in different parts of the site Baba.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:12 am |
 
|
|
|
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
|
bABA wrote: kypade wrote: I copied straight from the Variety email list, and haven't seen it any other way. oscar.com has geisha so does oscars.org. guess that settles it
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:12 am |
|
|
|
haerpinot
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 1051
|
Hmm, even the name of the person nominated for Sound Editing, Wylie Stateman, doesn't help as imdb.com lists him as working on neither Geisha nor Narnia. I'm so confused.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:16 am |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
tick tock Oscar sites, we have a contest to launch.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:17 am |
|
|
|
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
damn you oscars!!
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:18 am |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
MCN isn't doing any thinking either. They were just copying and left their full list with Memoirs in it but by film tally with Narnia.
And BOG is using the full list too. Crazy.
EDIT: IMDb has Memoirs in Sound Editing as well. Really confused.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:26 am |
|
|
|
The Scottie
King Albert!
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 11838
Location: The Happiest City on Earth
|
Nomination by Studio
1 Focus Features 16
2 Universal 12
3 Warner Bros. 8
4 Warner Independent 8
5 Fox 6
6 Sony Classics 6
7 Sony 6
8 Lions Gate 6
9 Buena Vista 4
10 Weinstein Company 4
11 New Line 3
12 Paramount 3
13 DreamWorks 2
14 Paramount Classics 2
15 IDP 1
16 Magnolia 1
17 ThinkFilm 1
18 International Film Circuit 1
_________________Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.    and many more.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:05 pm |
|
|
|
Cotton
Some days I'm a super bitch
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
|
Wow, 100% cohesion between the Best Pic and Best Director nominees.
YAY, TERRANCE HOWARD!!!!
Strange that Brokeback didn't snag an edititing nom  WHen was the last time a winner for Best Picture wasn't nominated for edititing?
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:40 pm |
|
|
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Cotton wrote: Wow, 100% cohesion between the Best Pic and Best Director nominees. YAY, TERRANCE HOWARD!!!! Strange that Brokeback didn't snag an edititing nom WHen was the last time a winner for Best Picture wasn't nominated for edititing? Ordinary People, 1980. _________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:43 pm |
|
|
|
Cotton
Some days I'm a super bitch
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
|
BTW, when was the last time ALL the Best Picture directors were nominated?
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:45 pm |
|
|
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Cotton wrote: BTW, when was the last time ALL the Best Picture directors were nominated? 1981 (1982 ceremony) _________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:47 pm |
|
|
|
Cotton
Some days I'm a super bitch
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
|
Christian wrote: Cotton wrote: BTW, when was the last time ALL the Best Picture directors were nominated? 1981 (1982 ceremony) Have you guys allready been discussing this? 
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:50 pm |
|
|
|
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
|
Christian wrote: Cotton wrote: Wow, 100% cohesion between the Best Pic and Best Director nominees. YAY, TERRANCE HOWARD!!!! Strange that Brokeback didn't snag an edititing nom WHen was the last time a winner for Best Picture wasn't nominated for edititing? Ordinary People, 1980. How do you guys look up these facts so quiclly?
Are they memorized and ingrained in your heads?
_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:50 pm |
|
|
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Cotton wrote: Christian wrote: Cotton wrote: BTW, when was the last time ALL the Best Picture directors were nominated? 1981 (1982 ceremony) Have you guys allready been discussing this? Yes. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:51 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Since we are on the streak of "when was the last time" questions, here is another one:
When was the last time we had no repeat nominee in all acting categories?
Answer: 1997, nobody nominated that year was nominated in 1996.
14 out of the 20 acting nominees this year are first-timers.
Also when was the last time a best picture nominee got zero GG nom?
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:53 pm |
|
|
|
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
It's a smaller award, but how the hell did Narnia pull out a Visual FX nomination over Revenge of the Sith? That's bullshit.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:59 pm |
|
|
|
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
|
The Dark Shape wrote: It's a smaller award, but how the hell did Narnia pull out a Visual FX nomination over Revenge of the Sith? That's bullshit. Well, Narnia gained ALOT of general buzz in the last stage of the nominations race because of its box-office.
And I haven't seen it, but it looks as if the FX are truly well integrated into the movie while for Sith, it's the actual footage and actors that are well integrated into the Visual fx 
_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:04 pm |
|
|
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
In 1998 (1999 awards) I know Life is Beautiful and Thin Red Line got zero globe noms. Don't know if they're the most recent.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:06 pm |
|
|
|
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
|
How many nods did American Beauty have?
_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:08 pm |
|
|
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Raffiki wrote: How many nods did American Beauty have? Eight. _________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:12 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Raffiki wrote: How many nods did American Beauty have? 8. _________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:12 pm |
|
|
|
Erendis
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:40 am
Posts: 1527
Location: Emyn Arnen
|
Lucky wrote: I'm thrilled that Munich received BP and BD noms,so much for those who were confident Munich would not be nominated for BP.
BBM with 8 noms. Isn't 8 nominations pretty low for the film with the most Oscar noms? It does seem low, but you can't expect much more for a slate of small human dramas. RotK only had three more noms than BBM, including all 4 million tech noms. From a prestige standpoint, BBM did better than RotK.
The BP nominations are lining up to spread the love while still giving BBM Best Picture. Capote is nommed for BP, but they'll award it with Actor, snubbing BBM. GNAGL is up, but Clooney will get original screenplay, where BBM isn't qualified. Crash is up, but it got the SAG, where BBM was snubbed. Munich is up, but it can get Editing, where BBM was snubbed.
Ang Lee can probably get Director outright, without help from trends and consolation prizes, but he's due one for Crouching Tiger anyway.
And c'mon, don't the LotR techs have enough awards already?
_________________
I'm not around much anymore because I don't have time (or permission, probably) to surf the 'net from my new job.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:12 pm |
|
|
|
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
|
xiayun wrote: Raffiki wrote: How many nods did American Beauty have? 8. Hmmm... what else was nominated that year?
_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:14 pm |
|
|
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Raffiki wrote: xiayun wrote: Raffiki wrote: How many nods did American Beauty have? 8. Hmmm... what else was nominated that year? Cider House Rules, Insider, Sixth Sense, Green Mile. _________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:14 pm |
|
|
|
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Raffiki wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: It's a smaller award, but how the hell did Narnia pull out a Visual FX nomination over Revenge of the Sith? That's bullshit. Well, Narnia gained ALOT of general buzz in the last stage of the nominations race because of its box-office. And I haven't seen it, but it looks as if the FX are truly well integrated into the movie while for Sith, it's the actual footage and actors that are well integrated into the Visual fx I have seen Narnia and most of the FX look like the kids were blue-screened into Shrek. Worst blue-screen compositing since Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone? Check. CGI Wolves that make The Day After Tomorrow's ILM team chuckle? Check.
Narnia has no place being nominated for that award.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:17 pm |
|
|
