Author |
Message |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Winner: SLUMDOG
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
GODDAMN IT
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Damnitttttt  Peace, Mike
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11627 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
FUCK SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE
_________________
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Fuck me in the ass
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
oh god. best ensemble my ass.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
The Dark Knight wasn't nominated? OUTRAGE
Told you slumdog. Stop doubting it fools.
_________________ k
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
SLUMDOG
<3
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
And there's your lock for Best Picture.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm Posts: 12821
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
yay
_________________ Best Actress 2008
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
OH NOES
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11627 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
I wish that movie never existed...fuck it!
_________________
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Can we all agree that Slumdog is TEH LOCK now?
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
pukes yet again
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Okay, Slumdog is locked up 120% now.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Maverikk wrote: Did Penn just call the TV actors IDIOTS?  I don't know! What did he say??? Also, SLUMDOG? REALLY?
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32636 Location: the last free city
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! SLUMDOG!!!!!!!!
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
Last edited by Rev on Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
I don't think the actors vote based on the film's actual ensemble anymore; the category has literally turned into a "best picture" category. It's a shame.
Peace, Mike
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
And I thought there wouldn't be a film as locked as NCFOM for a while.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
signed, sealed, delivered, forgotten by 2011.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
OH MY GOD, SOMEONE CHANGE THE FEATURES IN THIS FORUM. It's so damn annoying having to try several times to post. URGH.
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Use Quick Reply, it stops that annoying message from popping up.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:02 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
Box wrote: OH MY GOD, SOMEONE CHANGE THE FEATURES IN THIS FORUM. It's so damn annoying having to try several times to post. URGH. I know!
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:02 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 Re: SAG Discussion Thread
THIS IS FOR THE CHILDREN.
AHAHAHA.
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:02 pm |
|
|