2005 Golden Globe Prediction Thread
| Author |
Message |
|
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Libs wrote: Dkmuto wrote: The fact that a lot of these are surprising is good enough for me. This is a great year. N o Amy Adams, though.  I know.  She'll have the last laugh come Oscar time. _________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:24 pm |
|
|
|
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm
Posts: 7827
Location: please delete me
|
 Dr. Lecter wrote: Box wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win.  Yup. And of course, it will win. There's very little in Hollywood that is devoid of bias. You want a documentary to win the Osar? Make one about the Holocaust. You want an actress to win the award? Turn her into an ugly woman. You want to beat Star Wars for best picture? Make a pretentious little snoozefest of a comedy and you'll get your way. You reemmber what Eddie Murphy said in Bowfinger about winning the Best Actor Oscar? "White boys always get the Oscar. It's a known fact. Did I ever get a nomination? No! You know why? Cause I hadn't played any of them slave roles, and get my ass whipped. That's how you get the nomination. A black dude who plays a slave that gets his ass whipped gets the nomination, a white guy who plays an idiot gets the Oscar. That's what I need, I need to play a retarded slave, then I'll get the Oscar. "So funny, so true  I loved that line, and the Academy jsut enjoy nominating slave roles. I hate the Magical Mystial negro more, Michal Clarke Dunca int he Green Mile, WIll Smith in Bagger Vance, ugh...at least play a damn slave.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:32 pm |
|
|
|
BennyBlanco
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: The Bronx
|
BennyBlanco wrote: Didn't I read something about the foreign press having lukewarm reactions to Munich at a screening they had? Is this really a lock for a nomination tomorrow? Ahem.
Everyone was oblivious to this post, but I guess I got my answer, eh? So according to the foreign press, Spielberg and Jackson did a better job directing their movies than did Cronenberg, yet Cronenberg's movie was better? I'm always a little perplexed at these director/picture swaps, but whatever. Also, I believe people are being too quick to discount The New World for oscars because of these noms and I expect that this committee never even came near a screening of that movie.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:47 pm |
|
|
|
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm
Posts: 12821
|
BennyBlanco wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: Didn't I read something about the foreign press having lukewarm reactions to Munich at a screening they had? Is this really a lock for a nomination tomorrow? Ahem. Everyone was oblivious to this post, but I guess I got my answer, eh? So according to the foreign press, Spielberg and Jackson did a better job directing their movies than did Cronenberg, yet Cronenberg's movie was better? I'm always a little perplexed at these director/picture swaps, but whatever. Also, I believe people are being too quick to discount The New World for oscars because of these noms and I expect that this committee never even came near a screening of that movie. If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still...
Keep in mind that only one film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama. _________________ Best Actress 2008
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:55 pm |
|
|
|
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
|
Rod wrote: If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still...
Keep in mind that no film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama.
_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:58 pm |
|
|
|
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Rod wrote: If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still...
Keep in mind that only one film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama. No, when people were just wanting to hand out awards for it, I tried to tell them it was too obvious of a win. Not getting a BP nom at the Globes isn't the end of the world, but that, along with less than stellar reviews, pretty much kills it's chances.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:10 pm |
|
|
|
BennyBlanco
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: The Bronx
|
Rod wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: Didn't I read something about the foreign press having lukewarm reactions to Munich at a screening they had? Is this really a lock for a nomination tomorrow? Ahem. Everyone was oblivious to this post, but I guess I got my answer, eh? So according to the foreign press, Spielberg and Jackson did a better job directing their movies than did Cronenberg, yet Cronenberg's movie was better? I'm always a little perplexed at these director/picture swaps, but whatever. Also, I believe people are being too quick to discount The New World for oscars because of these noms and I expect that this committee never even came near a screening of that movie. If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still... Keep in mind that only one film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama. Which film was that?
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:25 pm |
|
|
|
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
|
I dont follow the award threads here so is it pretty much safe to assume that Brokeback Mnt has the highest chance of winning best pictures for the oscar than any other movie this year because of its golden globe nominations it has received?
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:26 pm |
|
|
|
dar
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
|
Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true  Yep, like they always do...
_________________You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri
What Mixed Drink Are You?
http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:39 pm |
|
|
|
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
|
dar wrote: Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true Yep, like they always do... When they have the opportunity, they sure do jump on it.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:42 pm |
|
|
|
dar
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
|
Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true Yep, like they always do... When they have the opportunity, they sure do jump on it. Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you...
WANNA FIGHT, UH? WANNA FIGHT?
Well, I don´t. I know you secretly love me. I do, too. *Kisses *_________________You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri
What Mixed Drink Are You?
http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:44 pm |
|
|
|
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
|
dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true Yep, like they always do... When they have the opportunity, they sure do jump on it. Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you... WANNA FIGHT, UH? WANNA FIGHT? Well, I don´t. Please just remember to take your medication. Thanks. So funny 
It takes two to fight.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:45 pm |
|
|
|
dar
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
|
Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true Yep, like they always do... When they have the opportunity, they sure do jump on it. Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you... WANNA FIGHT, UH? WANNA FIGHT? Well, I don´t. Please just remember to take your medication. Thanks. So funny It takes two to fight. And to make love. Kiss me, please. I can´t stand this anymore. Deeply, we know we are made for each other.   _________________You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri
What Mixed Drink Are You?
http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:49 pm |
|
|
|
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm
Posts: 12821
|
BennyBlanco wrote: Rod wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: Didn't I read something about the foreign press having lukewarm reactions to Munich at a screening they had? Is this really a lock for a nomination tomorrow? Ahem. Everyone was oblivious to this post, but I guess I got my answer, eh? So according to the foreign press, Spielberg and Jackson did a better job directing their movies than did Cronenberg, yet Cronenberg's movie was better? I'm always a little perplexed at these director/picture swaps, but whatever. Also, I believe people are being too quick to discount The New World for oscars because of these noms and I expect that this committee never even came near a screening of that movie. If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still... Keep in mind that only one film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama. Which film was that? Ghandi _________________Best Actress 2008
Last edited by Rod on Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:49 pm |
|
|
|
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Unlike the TV noms, the movie noms are actually pretty good. I'm glad there were a few surprises, especially The Constant Gardener. But...I'm surprised Finnes was snubbed when Weisz, Meirelles, and the picture itself were nominated.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:50 pm |
|
|
|
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
|
dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true Yep, like they always do... When they have the opportunity, they sure do jump on it. Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you... WANNA FIGHT, UH? WANNA FIGHT? Well, I don´t. Please just remember to take your medication. Thanks. So funny It takes two to fight. And to make love. Kiss me, please. I can´t stand this anymore. Deeply, we know we are made for each other.  Moves off in the opposite direction
Last edited by Harry Warden on Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:50 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Rod wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: Didn't I read something about the foreign press having lukewarm reactions to Munich at a screening they had? Is this really a lock for a nomination tomorrow? Ahem. Everyone was oblivious to this post, but I guess I got my answer, eh? So according to the foreign press, Spielberg and Jackson did a better job directing their movies than did Cronenberg, yet Cronenberg's movie was better? I'm always a little perplexed at these director/picture swaps, but whatever. Also, I believe people are being too quick to discount The New World for oscars because of these noms and I expect that this committee never even came near a screening of that movie. If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still... Keep in mind that only one film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama. Which one was it? _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:50 pm |
|
|
|
android
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 2913
Location: Portugal
|
Ghandi wasn't nominated for the picture Globe? Weird...
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:52 pm |
|
|
|
dar
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Rod wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: Didn't I read something about the foreign press having lukewarm reactions to Munich at a screening they had? Is this really a lock for a nomination tomorrow? Ahem. Everyone was oblivious to this post, but I guess I got my answer, eh? So according to the foreign press, Spielberg and Jackson did a better job directing their movies than did Cronenberg, yet Cronenberg's movie was better? I'm always a little perplexed at these director/picture swaps, but whatever. Also, I believe people are being too quick to discount The New World for oscars because of these noms and I expect that this committee never even came near a screening of that movie. If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still... Keep in mind that only one film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama. Which one was it? The last one to made it was "The sting"
"Gandhi" was not nominated for BP at the Globes, but that is cause they considered to be a foreign film. _________________You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri
What Mixed Drink Are You?
http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:53 pm |
|
|
|
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm
Posts: 12821
|
You know what, it wasn't eligible cause it was nominated and won for best foreign film.
So technically, NO film eligible for the best picture globe that wasn't nominated has gone on to win the best picture oscar, in the past 30 years.
It was nominated there and won, as well as actor, director, and screenplay. so it was in a mmuch better position either way.
_________________Best Actress 2008
Last edited by Rod on Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:55 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
dar wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Rod wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: BennyBlanco wrote: Didn't I read something about the foreign press having lukewarm reactions to Munich at a screening they had? Is this really a lock for a nomination tomorrow? Ahem. Everyone was oblivious to this post, but I guess I got my answer, eh? So according to the foreign press, Spielberg and Jackson did a better job directing their movies than did Cronenberg, yet Cronenberg's movie was better? I'm always a little perplexed at these director/picture swaps, but whatever. Also, I believe people are being too quick to discount The New World for oscars because of these noms and I expect that this committee never even came near a screening of that movie. If anyone thinks Munich has a chance of winning still... Keep in mind that only one film in the past 30 years has won a best picture Oscar without at least a best picture golden globe nomination, either in comedy or drama. Which one was it? The last one to made it was "The sting" "Gandhi" was not nominated for BP at the Globes, but that is cause they considered to be a foreign film. Uhhh...how so? Why did they consider it foreign? _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:55 pm |
|
|
|
dar
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
|
Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true Yep, like they always do... When they have the opportunity, they sure do jump on it. Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you... WANNA FIGHT, UH? WANNA FIGHT? Well, I don´t. Please just remember to take your medication. Thanks. So funny It takes two to fight. And to make love. Kiss me, please. I can´t stand this anymore. Deeply, we know we are made for each other. Moves off in the opposite direction Does that mean I don´t get to meet your parents?  _________________You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri
What Mixed Drink Are You?
http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:00 pm |
|
|
|
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
|
dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Joe wrote: jb007 wrote: WTF? A History of Violence? The 5 drama nominations are a big joke. Obviously making room for the gay movie to win. So wrong yet so true Yep, like they always do... When they have the opportunity, they sure do jump on it. Funny, I was going to say the same thing about you... WANNA FIGHT, UH? WANNA FIGHT? Well, I don´t. Please just remember to take your medication. Thanks. So funny It takes two to fight. And to make love. Kiss me, please. I can´t stand this anymore. Deeply, we know we are made for each other. Moves off in the opposite direction Does that mean I don´t get to meet your parents? Not unless you're willing to take a lie detector test.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:01 pm |
|
|
|
dar
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
|
Joe wrote: dar wrote: Does that mean I don´t get to meet your parents? Not unless you're willing to take a lie detector test. Uh? I didn´t undertsand that. But I love you, anyway. Let´s get married or something.
I have no idea why Gandhi was foreign to them... and I haven´t seen the film. Could it be that It was a UK-India coproduction and at the time they didn´t accept those? Again, no idea... _________________You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri
What Mixed Drink Are You?
http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:07 pm |
|
|
|
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
|
dar wrote: Joe wrote: dar wrote: Does that mean I don´t get to meet your parents? Not unless you're willing to take a lie detector test. Uh? I didn´t undertsand that. But I love you, anyway. Let´s get married or something. A 'Meet the Parents' reference.
|
| Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:08 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
