Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 4:59 pm



Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Happy with the noms? 
Author Message
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Frost/Nixon is the best movie of the year and is not conventional Oscar bait stuff, especially in a category with Milk, Benjamin Button, and Slumdog Millionaire. You're using the wrong word. Frost/Nixon is based on a play, is centered around the making of a political interview, and is impressive for leaving Nixon's legacy up to the audience (he is neither a hero nor a villain).

I would argue that Benjamin Button stole TDK's nomination, not The Reader. WB had the challenge of campaigning two uber blockbusters...and it chose Button over TDK.

Finally, if $500m won't do it, nothing will. So let's stop using box-office numbers as a rational. OK, Lecter?


Last edited by torrino on Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:13 am
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
2nd most nominations ever, tied with Gone With The Wind, From Here To Eternity, Shakespeare in Love, Chicago, and wait for it, FORREST GUMP.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:14 am
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I do think people kind of need to get over themselves a little bit with the threats of "Boycott!" and "Suicide!" and "OHhhhmyygahhhhhhhh my life is over."

I mean, the movie was FABULOUSLY successful and will be remembered for years to come. The Academy is not the be all-end all of everything.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:15 am
Profile
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
SFERIC wrote:
Anyone else think 13 noms for a movie is a little excessive?



for Benjamin Button definitely not deserved. But I think the nominations is what they are awarding it because it's going to come out almost empty handed come Oscar night.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:18 am
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Actually Sam, Benjamin Button will probably win the most awards of the night, even if that tally comes from misc. categories. We'll see.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:19 am
Profile WWW
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I think we'll see slumdog win 5 or 6 though, no?

Picture
Director
Screenplay
Song
Editing
Maybe a sound award, probably not.

_________________
k


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:22 am
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Rorschach wrote:
da torri wrote:
Frost/Nixon is the best movie of the year and is not conventional Oscar bait stuff, especially in a category with Milk, Benjamin Button, and Slumdog Millionaire. You're using the wrong word. Frost/Nixon is based on a play, is centered around the making of a political interview, and is impressive for leaving the categorization of Nixon up to the audience (he is neither a hero nor a villain).

I would argue that Benjamin Button that stole TDK's nomination, not The Reader. WB had the challenge of campaigning two uber blockbusters...and it chose Button over TDK.

Finally, if $500m won't do it, nothing will. So let's stop using box-office numbers as a rational.


Paramount released Ben Button domestically, WB did OS. Paramount handled its Oscar marketing.

And Frost/Nixon is totally Oscar-bait stuff. I don't even feel like I have to justify this.

Studios wage hundreds of thousands into Oscar campaigns. You really think Paramount's Oscar marketing was independent of WB when they knew way back in October that both films could be competing for the same spot? Uhuh.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:24 am
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
But Button could easily walk away with...

Costumes
Cinematography
Score
Art Direction
Visual Effects
Make-up

and maybe Editing, with Slumdog taking the rest, but that's a stretch. In fact, I'd go as far to say that Button will probably win all of those except Score (which could go Wall-E or Slumdog too... I dunno).

If Hensen wins Best Supporting Actress early, we'll know Button is sweeping.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:25 am
Profile WWW
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
roo wrote:
Actually Sam, Benjamin Button will probably win the most awards of the night, even if that tally comes from misc. categories. We'll see.


which ones other than makeup?


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:26 am
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I feel like Slumdog's editing is too flashy to lose. Fuckin' Bourne won last year.

_________________
k


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:27 am
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
the phone sequence was pretty silly, which means it'll win the Oscar.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:29 am
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
The big winners I see are:

Slumdog Millionaire: Picture, Director, Screenplay, Song, Editing (5)

Benjamin Button: Costumes, Art Direction, Make-Up, Cinematography, Visual effects (5)

I tend to think that it's Milk's award in Original Screenplay to lose.

Score could go to SM, BB or Wall-E

Sound categories could go to Wall-E. At most, I think Wall-E will win 3.

So Score is the category that swings to Slumdog or Button getting the most wins.

In a better world, Nixon would win Adapted Screenplay (it's the best of the crop), Slumdog would win Score and all of the Bp nominees would walk away with...

Slumdog: 5
Button: 5
Frost/Nixon: 1 (Screenplay)
Reader: 1 (Actress)
Milk: 1 (Original Screenplay)


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:31 am
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Also, I haven't seen The Visitor yet but it's really nice to see such an underappreciated character actor like Richard Jenkins getting his moment for once.

He should've gotten a nomination for North Country three years ago.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:41 am
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
roo wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
The core of Slumdog that people are falling in love with is convential. India and shit is different, but the reason why the film is a succuess is the core convential story about a fairly-tale "I'll do anything to find you" love story.

But you could make the same arguments about The Dark Knight on a different scale. How it's just Heat or a mobster movie with a slight twist.

Otherwise the cast is extremely high pedigree, it's polished and expensive. If it didn't have a guy in a rubber suit in it it would be 100% conventional.

It's never been a great example of the "comic film genre" because it's so outside the norms on that level. Iron Man is much closer to a comic book film at heart.

That's my take at least.
regardless of the inner workings of the plot, the movie is essentially about a guy who dresses up as a bat and gets taken seriously. That alone makes it way less conventional than something like Slumdog.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:44 am
Profile WWW
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6333
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
No. Fuck the Academy.

_________________
.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:55 am
Profile
The Dark Knight

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:11 pm
Posts: 777
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Libs wrote:
I do think people kind of need to get over themselves a little bit with the threats of "Boycott!" and "Suicide!" and "OHhhhmyygahhhhhhhh my life is over."

I mean, the movie was FABULOUSLY successful and will be remembered for years to come. The Academy is not the be all-end all of everything.



Who's doin' all of this?


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:09 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
You know who won't be happy with the noms?

The people who are financing Oscar night.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:16 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
VERY HAPPY! My five favorite films of last year -- Frost/Nixon, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Defiance, In Bruges, and The Reader -- were all nominated for at least one Academy Award. Three are up for Best Picture. :D

I do wish Leo had been nominated, though. I hope he still shows up to the ceremony, if only to root for Kate.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:28 pm
Profile
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40611
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Only thing I'm pissed about is Button getting 13. That's a dark stain on nomination tally history.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:42 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
It's a bad year for Best Picture nominees. As bad as when Crash won? Considering what didn't make it in, it may be even worse.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:47 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Libs wrote:
Generally, yes. I mean, I would obviously be much happier if TDK got nominated.

But I think a lot of the acting nominations have gone to good people and good actors.


I agree.

The top two best reviewed films of the year were Wall E and The Dark Knight, but because they're animated and "comic book" movies, they can't be considered as Best Picture. The snobbery of the Academy always wins (which is how snoozefests like "Chariots of Fire" win against "Raiders of the Lost Ark".

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:47 pm
Profile WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
After thinking back to the thing this morning, the first nomination made me really happy and might have stopped me from tossing my TV through the window: Amy Adams. I remember when she was first nominated for Junebug, back when she was just new on the Hollywood scene and thinking she might not ever get another Academy Award nomination. Thankfully, I was wrong. And well-deserved too. I like her a lot.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:52 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
And to add to the Doubt love, without having seen the movie, I'm glad for Viola Davis after watching her on the short-lived, low-rated series "Traveler" on ABC.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:56 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Meh. The Reader really kinda fucked everything up. I would have loved to see The Wrestler, RevRoad, Gran Torino and maybe even *big gasp* Wall-E get in before The Reader. And I even liked it.

It's so out of the blue that I don't think it has even fully registered in my brain that it's a BP nominee. Seriously. Like when I think of The Reader and I think of Best Picture together, my brain gets kinda confused. It's like it doesn't want to sort it into that category. Again, I'm not dishing on the movie... it's that it was so unexpected.

I can't believe The Dark Knight didn't get nominated. I think to me it was almost as big a surprise as The Reader getting nominated.

Most of the acting noms were fine. I would really have preferred Eastwood or DiCaprio over Pitt but whatever. Kate should have been nominated for Revolutionary Road which makes Michael Shannon's nomination even more bizarre.

I think I have been pretty unfairly negatively vocal about Sally Hawkins and truth be told, I would trade in the Happy Go Lucky screenplay nod to give her one instead. She was good in the movie. My main issues were with the movie itself. I don't think it deserved that screenplay nomination AT ALL... especially over The Wrestler.

Anyone have a nomination tally for all the films?

_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man

Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine


Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:04 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
If Clint had been nominated for Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Director, Best Original Score and Best Song... I don't think I would've minded more than I do for The Reader's nods. And I hate to say that only because I haven't seen The Reader. But judging by some talk, it sounds mediocre at best. We missed out on a historic first (TDK) or a well-deserved second time ever (WALL-E) for The Reader?

And no need to speculate that anything else took the fifth spot. The Reader had no chance and it snuck in. Simple, case closed.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:08 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.