Author |
Message |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Yeah, the Best Supporting Actor category is certainly getting more and more interesting. Thandie Newton's win confirms my opinion of that she was snubbed for an Oscar nom!  She was much better than, say, Frances McDormand. Personally, I don't think so > no Oscar effect > the Brits just screwed it up starting with not putting Rachel W in the supporting category.
Um, you hightlight me talking about Best Supporting Actor and speak about Rachel Weisz? Huh?!
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:17 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Yeah, the Best Supporting Actor category is certainly getting more and more interesting. Thandie Newton's win confirms my opinion of that she was snubbed for an Oscar nom!  She was much better than, say, Frances McDormand. Personally, I don't think so > no Oscar effect > the Brits just screwed it up starting with not putting Rachel W in the supporting category. Um, you hightlight me talking about Best Supporting Actor and speak about Rachel Weisz? Huh?!
because you were talking about this getting more interesting, including some Oscar talk above, but the BAFTA's didn't include RW in there as the Oscars did.
That is why I said no Oscar effect as RW is a big part of this equation.
IMO, of course.
*********************
PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Amy Adams - JUNEBUG
Catherine Keener - CAPOTE
Frances McDormand - NORTH COUNTRY
Rachel Weisz - THE CONSTANT GARDENER
Michelle Williams - BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
|
Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:30 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Yeah, the Best Supporting Actor category is certainly getting more and more interesting. Thandie Newton's win confirms my opinion of that she was snubbed for an Oscar nom!  She was much better than, say, Frances McDormand. Personally, I don't think so > no Oscar effect > the Brits just screwed it up starting with not putting Rachel W in the supporting category. Um, you hightlight me talking about Best Supporting Actor and speak about Rachel Weisz? Huh?! because you were talking about this getting more interesting, including some Oscar talk above, but the BAFTA's didn't include RW in there as the Oscars did. That is why I said no Oscar effect as RW is a big part of this equation. IMO, of course. ********************* PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE Amy Adams - JUNEBUG Catherine Keener - CAPOTE Frances McDormand - NORTH COUNTRY Rachel Weisz - THE CONSTANT GARDENER Michelle Williams - BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
But I am talking about ACTOR. not ACTRESS.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:33 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Cotton wrote: Who won adapted screenplay?
Brokeback.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:40 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Yeah, the Best Supporting Actor category is certainly getting more and more interesting. Thandie Newton's win confirms my opinion of that she was snubbed for an Oscar nom!  She was much better than, say, Frances McDormand. Personally, I don't think so > no Oscar effect > the Brits just screwed it up starting with not putting Rachel W in the supporting category. Um, you hightlight me talking about Best Supporting Actor and speak about Rachel Weisz? Huh?! because you were talking about this getting more interesting, including some Oscar talk above, but the BAFTA's didn't include RW in there as the Oscars did. That is why I said no Oscar effect as RW is a big part of this equation. IMO, of course. ********************* PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE Amy Adams - JUNEBUG Catherine Keener - CAPOTE Frances McDormand - NORTH COUNTRY Rachel Weisz - THE CONSTANT GARDENER Michelle Williams - BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN But I am talking about ACTOR. not ACTRESS.
my mistake, I saw the actresses names but I didn't realize that you have switched and were talking about both Actors and Actresses.
|
Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:58 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
Stephen Fry is funny.
|
Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:15 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
It's hilarious that Mischa Barton attends every year.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:28 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Shack wrote: Gyllenhall is in prime position now. Best Supporting Actor is so up in the air. George with the Globe, Paul with the SAG, Jake with the BAFTA. And I wouldn't count out Matt Dillon either.
Ahhh, the irony of that statement: Gyllenhall is in Prime Position now.. Yeah, that's putting it mildly..
|
Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:33 am |
|
|