Producer's Guild Nominees
Author |
Message |
haerpinot
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 1051
|
Isn't that the excuse they used for the Golden Globes as well? Does Universal really suck that much or is OscarWatch just grasping at straws to keep Munich in the race? Keeps things interesting at least.
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 6:19 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
I can buy that argument for Munich, but not for King Kong, which should have been seen by enough people to be nominated if they had liked it enough.
Still, overall, the industry support for Munich has not been strong.
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 6:24 pm |
|
 |
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm Posts: 11289 Location: Germany
|
The many critics top 10 placements really had me thought of Kong having quite a good chance at an academy nomination for best pic... so much for it... oh, well...
_________________
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 6:34 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
what a shit 5.
Sorry.
It's far too simple to produce a film like Capote or Crash IMO.
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 7:21 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
What the hell is that?
Aren't these the producers awards where they are supposed to nominate hits and not some obscure films like Capote? Capote is a movie that, no matter how well reviewed, will be forgotten within a year or two.
Anyway, King Kong's lost and so are Munich's chances at a win. Brokeback Mountain will take it.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:41 pm |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
I don't think you guys are giving Capote it's just desserts. Besides just PSH turning in what I'd say is the best performance I've seen all decade, the film was considered to be flawless by nearly every critic out there (in addition to 100% on RT's Cream of the Crop, Metacritic has it listed as the best reviewed film of the year that played in over five theaters). While it's true that the film is somewhat minimalistic, in a time when so many films suffer from bloated running times it certainly does stand out as all but a masterpiece to many.
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 9:33 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
And yet it won't turn into a cult favorite when years pass on, it won't be one of the most beloved movies around at any time, it won't cut any Top 10 lists of the decade/all-time and whatnot. It simply will not be remembered. Brokeback Mountain will be, King Kong will be, Munich will be, even Crash most likely will be. But Capote won't.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 9:35 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Just FYI - I didn't want to start a new thread but there are other categories
Producers Guild Awards 2006 NOMINATIONS
THEATRICAL MOTION PICTURE
BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
Diana Ossana
James Schamus
CAPOTE
Caroline Baron
William Vince
Michael Ohoven
CRASH
Paul Haggis
Cathy Schulman
GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK
Grant Heslov
WALK THE LINE
James Keach
Cathy Konrad
ANIMATED MOTION PICTURE
CHICKEN LITTLE
Randy Fullmer
MADAGASCAR
Mireille Soria
ROBOTS
Jerry Davis
John C. Donkin
William Joyce
TIM BURTON'S CORPSE BRIDE
Tim Burton
Allison Abbate
WALLACE & GROMIT: THE CURSE OF THE WERE-RABBIT
(Credits are pending arbitration)
TELEVISION: LONG-FORM
EMPIRE FALLS (HBO)
(Credits are pending arbitration)
INTO THE WEST (TNT)
(Credits are pending arbitration)
LACKAWANNA BLUES (HBO)
Ruben Santiago-Hudson
Halle Berry
Vincent Cirrincione
Shelby Stone
Nellie Rachel Nugiel
THE LIFE AND DEATH OF PETER SELLERS (HBO)
(Credits are pending arbitration)
WARM SPRINGS (HBO)
Mark Gordon
Celia Costas
Chrisann Verges
TELEVISION SERIES: COMEDY
ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT (FOX)
Ron Howard & Brian Grazer
David Nevins
Mitchell Hurwitz
John Levenstein
Richard Rosenstock
Chuck Martin
Victor Hsu
CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM (HBO)
Larry David
Jeff Garlin
Robert B. Weide
Larry Charles
Tim Gibbons
DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES (ABC)
Marc Cherry
Tom Spezialy
Michael Edelstein
George W. Perkins
ENTOURAGE (HBO)
Doug Ellin
Stephen Levinson
Julian Farino
Mark Greenberg
Wayne Carmona
TWO AND A HALF MEN (CBS)
Chuck Lorre
Lee Aronsohn
Michael Collier
TELEVISION SERIES: DRAMA
24 (FOX)
Joel Surnow
Robert Cochran
Howard Gordon
Brian Grazer
Evan Katz
Jon Cassar
Stephen Kronish
Michael Loceff
BOSTON LEGAL (ABC)
Bill D'Elia
David E. Kelley
Mike Listo
Steve Robin
Janet Knutsen
GREY'S ANATOMY (ABC)
Mark Gordon
Shonda Rhimes
James Parriott
Betsy Beers
Peter Horton
Rob Corn
LOST (ABC)
J. J. Abrams
Damon Lindelof
Bryan Burk
Jack Bender
Jean Higgins
Carlton Cuse
SIX FEET UNDER (HBO)
Alan Ball
Alan Poul
Bruce Eric Kaplan
Robert Del Valle
Lori Jo Nemhauser
TELEVISION SERIES OR SPECIAL: NON-FICTION
30 DAYS (FX)
R.J. Cutler
H.T. Owens
Ben Silverman
Morgan Spurlock
Jonathan Chinn
Alison Ellwood
Keith Hoffman
60 MINUTES (CBS)
Jeff Fager
AMAZING RACE 6 (CBS)
Jerry Bruckheimer
Bertram van Munster
Jonathan Littman
Amy Chacon
Hayma "Screech" Washington
Evan Weinstein
Elise Doganieri
Scott Owens
AMAZING RACE 7 (CBS)
Jerry Bruckheimer
Bertram van Munster
Jonathan Littman
Amy Chacon
Hayma "Screech" Washington
Evan Weinstein
Elise Doganieri
Mark Vertullo
EXTREME MAKEOVER: HOME EDITION (ABC)
Tom Forman
Craig Armstrong
TELEVISION SERIES OR SPECIAL: VARIETY
77TH ANNUAL ACADEMY AWARDS (ABC)
Gilbert Cates
THE ELLEN DEGENERES SHOW (syndicated)
Ellen DeGeneres
Mary Connelly
Ed Glavin
Andy Lassner
Karen Kilgariff
LATE NIGHT WITH CONAN O'BRIEN (NBC)
Lorne Michaels
Jeff Ross
Tracy King
Frank Smiley
Daniel Ferguson
LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN (CBS)
Maria Pope
Barbara Gaines
Rob Burnett
Jude Brennan
REAL TIME WITH BILL MAHER (HBO)
Bill Maher
Scott Carter
Sheila Griffiths
Dean Johnsen
|
Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:26 pm |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: And yet it won't turn into a cult favorite when years pass on, it won't be one of the most beloved movies around at any time, it won't cut any Top 10 lists of the decade/all-time and whatnot. It simply will not be remembered. Brokeback Mountain will be, King Kong will be, Munich will be, even Crash most likely will be. But Capote won't.
I'm not convinced it won't, but if it does, I think that the small release would be much more to blame then the film's quality. By that logic, you could tout Fantastic Four or Shrek 2 over Capote or Downfall.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:23 am |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
I don;t think it's about the quality, though.
These are producers...they're supposed to go for Kong, or Munich.
What is there to produce in a small budget, character driven drama like Capote? Yknow?
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:35 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
MovieDude wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: And yet it won't turn into a cult favorite when years pass on, it won't be one of the most beloved movies around at any time, it won't cut any Top 10 lists of the decade/all-time and whatnot. It simply will not be remembered. Brokeback Mountain will be, King Kong will be, Munich will be, even Crash most likely will be. But Capote won't. I'm not convinced it won't, but if it does, I think that the small release would be much more to blame then the film's quality. By that logic, you could tout Fantastic Four or Shrek 2 over Capote or Downfall.
No, you see, people won't remember F4 and Shrek 2 (well, maybe Shrek 2, but hey it had splendid reviews as well) either as classic. They won't appear on any lists either.
Downfall is much different. It has 8.6/10 at IMDB for a reason and it made its way into the all-time Top 50 already and should remain there. Good luck on Capote getting anywhere close.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:41 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
MovieDude wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: And yet it won't turn into a cult favorite when years pass on, it won't be one of the most beloved movies around at any time, it won't cut any Top 10 lists of the decade/all-time and whatnot. It simply will not be remembered. Brokeback Mountain will be, King Kong will be, Munich will be, even Crash most likely will be. But Capote won't. I'm not convinced it won't, but if it does, I think that the small release would be much more to blame then the film's quality. By that logic, you could tout Fantastic Four or Shrek 2 over Capote or Downfall.
Fantastic Four won't be remembered 5 years from now unless they kept making sequels. Shrek 2 will only be talked about when we are discussing the all-time box office chart or when another Wednesday opener starts with a disappointing number. Capote and Downfall are similar in that they are both small, but Downfall will be remembered much longer than Capote will be, even though I haven't seen Downfall yet. It's currently in the IMDb's top 50 list. It has passionate fan supports from those who have seen it, very much like Eternal Sunshine or City of God. Capote simply doesn't have that. It'll be another Kinsey and American Splendor instead, very well reviewed for that year but not much talked about after.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:41 am |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
xiayun wrote: MovieDude wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: And yet it won't turn into a cult favorite when years pass on, it won't be one of the most beloved movies around at any time, it won't cut any Top 10 lists of the decade/all-time and whatnot. It simply will not be remembered. Brokeback Mountain will be, King Kong will be, Munich will be, even Crash most likely will be. But Capote won't. I'm not convinced it won't, but if it does, I think that the small release would be much more to blame then the film's quality. By that logic, you could tout Fantastic Four or Shrek 2 over Capote or Downfall. Fantastic Four won't be remembered 5 years from now unless they kept making sequels. Shrek 2 will only be talked about when we are discussing the all-time box office chart or when another Wednesday opener starts with a disappointing number. Capote and Downfall are similar in that they are both small, but Downfall will be remembered much longer than Capote will be, even though I haven't seen Downfall yet. It's currently in the IMDb's top 50 list. It has passionate fan supports from those who have seen it, very much like Eternal Sunshine or City of God. Capote simply doesn't have that. It'll be another Kinsey and American Splendor instead, very well reviewed for that year but not much talked about after.
Exactly. That's exactly how I think of it as well.
PEACE, Mike.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:42 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
xiayun wrote: MovieDude wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: And yet it won't turn into a cult favorite when years pass on, it won't be one of the most beloved movies around at any time, it won't cut any Top 10 lists of the decade/all-time and whatnot. It simply will not be remembered. Brokeback Mountain will be, King Kong will be, Munich will be, even Crash most likely will be. But Capote won't. I'm not convinced it won't, but if it does, I think that the small release would be much more to blame then the film's quality. By that logic, you could tout Fantastic Four or Shrek 2 over Capote or Downfall. Fantastic Four won't be remembered 5 years from now unless they kept making sequels. Shrek 2 will only be talked about when we are discussing the all-time box office chart or when another Wednesday opener starts with a disappointing number. Capote and Downfall are similar in that they are both small, but Downfall will be remembered much longer than Capote will be, even though I haven't seen Downfall yet. It's currently in the IMDb's top 50 list. It has passionate fan supports from those who have seen it, very much like Eternal Sunshine or City of God. Capote simply doesn't have that. It'll be another Kinsey and American Splendor instead, very well reviewed for that year but not much talked about after.
Very well said.
And that brings me to wondering why on earth PGA nominates Capote, but snubbed Eternal Sunshine which was much more successful, much more widely beloved and had at least just as much critical support.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:43 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Meh whatever maybe it won't be remembered as widely as some of those films, but that doesn't change the fact that it was all but unanimously thought to be a flawless stroke of genius.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:49 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
MovieDude wrote: Meh whatever maybe it won't be remembered as widely as some of those films, but that doesn't change the fact that it was all but unanimously thought to be a flawless stroke of genius.
Which you agree with because otherwise you wouldn't be defending it so much on here, heh.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:59 am |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
loyal wrote: It's far too simple to produce a film like Capote or Crash IMO.
Unless I'm seriously misunderstanding the point of guild awards, this award should not be to the best film of the year...just like the DGA should pick the best directed and the WGA should pick the best written, this should be the best produced. And I agree with loyal...I just don't think small budget, character dramas deserve such high recognition (especially over something like King Kong)
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:00 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
I don't know, you make a good point but in defense of the smaller films (at least Crash and Capote) they both got the releases they did because the producers got them into film festivals and used old fashioned word of mouth to get them a wide release distribution. That sure sounds a lot tougher to me then knowing that your film will be released in over 2,000 theaters nationwide no matter what happens.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:03 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Hmmm, a movie like Crash with such a director/screenwriter and cast wouldn't need the festivals even.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:05 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40248
|
I doubt Crash had much problem being released. Brendon Frasier, Matt Dillon, Sandra Bullock, Don Cheadle, Ludacris, Ryan Phillipe, Thandie Newton, Haggis coming off the MDB BP win, Jennifer Esposisto...The cast was A-list enough that there was no way this was flying under the radar.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:08 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
I'll have to do a search, but I remember Lion's Gate picking it up from a film festival, and some of the people talking about how much of a journey the production was. However, I was referring much more to Capote when I said that, just so you all don't pick it apart. Oh, and for the record, the cast really isn't much as far as selling goes. Don Cheadle was "that one guy", and really... well, I'm looking through all the other names and can't find one person who I'd be surprised to see in a direct-to-video film.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:11 am |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
Hm. Maybe I have the wrong idea of what exactly the producer does.
From what I understand/stood, the producer basically handles the money (keeping within budget and such) and makes sure everything goes smooth, basically gets the film made. That's why I assume when you have a director working with a good script, a good cameraman and incredible actors, with no major special effects or big money on the line, the producer wouldn't have as big a job. With Kong, and even something like Munich (or even to a lesser degree, Memoirs) there are big budgets on the line, lots of action and special effects stuff that could go wrong, and generally a more hectic job. I just figured producers would realize that "producing" something like Kong and getting basically everything from financing to distributing through smoothly and within budget/time would be more recognition worth than...well, Capote, or Crash.
who knows, though...obviously, they're the producers, they know what their job entails, and they voted how they did...so I could be way off base. It's just not what I would have expected....
but really, of all the award stuff out there right now, this is easily one of the absolute..."who cares" of em all...i mean, for me personally. I have no stake in any of this, their work really isnt as recognizable instantly as acting or directing or writing...so why it even bothers me (or does it?) is beyond me.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:11 am |
|
 |
haerpinot
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 1051
|
I would think producing a movie on a shoestring, limited budget is harder than producing a movie where the budget is virtually unlimited (how many blockbusters do we hear about going over-budget?), but then again I'm not a producer so this is pure conjecture. And the other side of that coin makes sense too. But for whatever reason, the producers saw Capote being more of a feat than King Kong or Munich. Or maybe they just thought Capote was a better movie. Or maybe they didn't get the screeners for Kong or Munich in time. And so on and so forth...
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:25 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Someone else at OW also made a point that the films that are nominated this year are all good profit-makers, while King Kong and Munich is still trying to cover their production costs domestically. However, it's still a drastic change from what producers had done in the past, where they had ignored indie-success and nominated similar big-budget films such as The Aviator which hadn't made half of its cost by the nomination time. It's really a head scratcher, I have to say, and the most shocking result I've seen from any guilds since I started paying attention.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:05 am |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Shack wrote: I doubt Crash had much problem being released. Brendon Frasier, Matt Dillon, Sandra Bullock, Don Cheadle, Ludacris, Ryan Phillipe, Thandie Newton, Haggis coming off the MDB BP win, Jennifer Esposisto...The cast was A-list enough that there was no way this was flying under the radar.
Crash was filmed or finished probably at the same time or months before Million Dollar Baby was even released.
|
Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:10 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|