Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 6:12 pm



Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 First sure-fire nominee for 2006 film year 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
With this being her first Hollywood work, having such a following as to elipse Binoche as the big French Actress (imo), having proven her holding power in English film, and the immense popularity of the source book, I'm putting it down in print right now that she's getting an Oscar nod next year, 100%.


I take everything I said back.

:unsure:

I should have realized, the first sure-fire nominee of this upcoming year is, and always was, A Scanner Darkly for Best Animated film. There is zero percent chance at this point that it doesn't get a nomination.


Sun May 21, 2006 12:04 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
dolcevita wrote:
With this being her first Hollywood work, having such a following as to elipse Binoche as the big French Actress (imo), having proven her holding power in English film, and the immense popularity of the source book, I'm putting it down in print right now that she's getting an Oscar nod next year, 100%.


I take everything I said back.

:unsure:

I should have realized, the first sure-fire nominee of this upcoming year is, and always was, A Scanner Darkly for Best Animated film. There is zero percent chance at this point that it doesn't get a nomination.


Not sure about that. Since it is filmed first and then animated, Oscar viters likely will prefer completely animated movies. They're too traditional. BTW by calling it, you jsut destroyed its chances. You know that, don't you? :biggrin:


Sun May 21, 2006 12:36 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Levy wrote:

Not sure about that. Since it is filmed first and then animated, Oscar viters likely will prefer completely animated movies. They're too traditional. BTW by calling it, you jsut destroyed its chances. You know that, don't you? :biggrin:


:ohmy:

I'll have you know that I only wish I was so important that my eccentric "callings" of films' receptions and recognitions truly affected their futures! Mighty deity that I am.


They're not that conservative, btw. They gave Triplettes of Belleville the greenlight (I loved that movie). I said nomination, not win, but judging by how all the animated movies thus far have performed, it might even win. Its pretty much down to it and Cars, right?


Sun May 21, 2006 12:52 pm
Profile
Post 
In a sense, Scanner Darkly isn't much different than Polar Express. Neither are traditional animated films.

I also would hope that Scanner being a film not aimed at kids would help its chances.


Sun May 21, 2006 1:11 pm
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
Levy wrote:

Not sure about that. Since it is filmed first and then animated, Oscar viters likely will prefer completely animated movies. They're too traditional. BTW by calling it, you jsut destroyed its chances. You know that, don't you? :biggrin:


:ohmy:

I'll have you know that I only wish I was so important that my eccentric "callings" of films' receptions and recognitions truly affected their futures! Mighty deity that I am.


They're not that conservative, btw. They gave Triplettes of Belleville the greenlight (I loved that movie). I said nomination, not win, but judging by how all the animated movies thus far have performed, it might even win. Its pretty much down to it and Cars, right?


Don't count Over the Hedge out


Sun May 21, 2006 3:44 pm
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post 
Ouch. this tread shows the benefit of hindsight.

i'm not sure if Darkly has a big chance either. Hope im wrong though.

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Sun May 21, 2006 4:04 pm
Profile
2.71828183

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm
Posts: 7827
Location: please delete me
Post Re: First sure-fire nominee for 2006 film year
dolcevita wrote:
Is definately Audrey Tautau. I don't see how there is a single way in which she won't be nominated for an acting award in Da Vinci Code. She's been building an international following, and between Amelie and last year's excellent A Very Long Engagement, she's already well known in the States. Interestingly enough, she had a very strong English-language cross-over with the british Dirty Pretty Things. That movie succeeded far more than Dot the i (Bernal's English crossover) and many other language cross-over films. It had incredibly high critical praise and a very strong/long box office run that neared 10 million.

With this being her first Hollywood work, having such a following as to elipse Binoche as the big French Actress (imo), having proven her holding power in English film, and the immense popularity of the source book, I'm putting it down in print right now that she's getting an Oscar nod next year, 100%.


Of course DPT succeeded more then Dot the I, since as the latter had one of the worst ending in film ever.

[spoil]Indie films should never end with the villain monlooguing, dear god did I want to shut the mian actrsses boyfriend, it ruined the whole bloody film.[/spoil]


Last edited by Ripper on Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:19 am, edited 2 times in total.



Sun May 21, 2006 5:44 pm
Profile
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
They shafted Waking Life for Jimmy Neutron, so A Scanner Darkly still has a lot of ways to go.

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sun May 21, 2006 5:53 pm
Profile
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40601
Post 
Aha, we've all been fools.

The first sure-fire nomination, is also the first absolute lock winner of the year.

...Cars. :)

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed May 24, 2006 10:54 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Departed had a screening today and it's suppose to be really good. Im hearing it's Marty back to true form.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:06 am
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 135
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Departed had a screening today and it's suppose to be really good. Im hearing it's Marty back to true form.


Really? :huh: That's not what I'm hearing ...

"Simply put this film does some things a bit better that I.A but overall it isn’t a better film." - http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com

"a glorious sloppy mess of a movie that can’t quite decide what it wants to be ... I suspect it won’t be quite as good as everyone (myself included) probably hoped." - http://alfonsomangione.blogspot.com/200 ... rsese.html


Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:56 pm
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Yeah those were posted links at Oscarwatch. The AICN review was written from the perspective of someone who really likes Infernal Affairs, but both sound like they were willing to give a remake a chance, but that it didn't really thrill them.

Hrm.

I also am not certain about A Scanner Darkly. I've read some bad-mediocre reviews of the film and regardless of the technical animation achievement of the film, if it doesn't come across as a "great" film it probably won't have a nomination chance.

Pixar will probably score Oscar #2 for Cars, but it is a pretty safe bet for a nomination at this point. The only other films released at this point that I think might have a shot at any nominations are An Inconvenient Truth and United 93 and maybe Road to Guantanamo.

Really the only "Oscarish" film released so far is United 93. Something where chances, "importance", and critic reviews all line up in the way that could give it a major nomination.


Last edited by andaroo1 on Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:18 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
One thing that the film does is make the mob boss character a complete psycho who in one scene participates in a three way in which one of the women is donning a strap on. Is this scene really necessary? I was really disappointed with Nicholson’s performance as it was a bit too over the top for me and it had a few too many comedic moments, including his death scene.

:ohmy:


Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:19 pm
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
loyalfromlondon wrote:
One thing that the film does is make the mob boss character a complete psycho who in one scene participates in a three way in which one of the women is donning a strap on. Is this scene really necessary? I was really disappointed with Nicholson’s performance as it was a bit too over the top for me and it had a few too many comedic moments, including his death scene.

:ohmy:


WTF?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:38 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
How can a movie where all Jackie boy takes a strap on be bad?

Yeah, seems as though the negative is coming in, I was getting hyped too after hearing good things on Chud and IMDb. There is a new review on http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=23536 didnt love it, didnt hate it.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:42 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
It got a new ending (partially) and it flat-out sucks compared to the original. Bleh.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:44 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Is there really anyway Flags of our Fathers isnt the frontrunner right now? The script is suppose to be amazing and all other oscar hyped films such as Departed & Good Shepherd dont seem to be living up to the hype.

Eastwood has got it again, they should just hand it to him right now.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:46 pm
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Is there really anyway Flags of our Fathers isnt the frontrunner right now? The script is suppose to be amazing and all other oscar hyped films such as Departed & Good Shepherd dont seem to be living up to the hype.

Eastwood has got it again, they should just hand it to him right now.

I'm not necessarily sure I would call Flags the frontrunner, but it's definately there. I also think his other movie might conflict a little with it. I'm not sure.


Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:55 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
I think what they should do is release Red Sun, Black Sand after the Oscars, so if Eastwood's Flags does end up winning it should help out the movies BO tremendously, they shouldnt release the movie one or two months after Flags, like you said it could cause problems, but at the sametime it could also help. Hollywood would really appreciate such a bold move such as make two different movies in different perspectives.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:05 pm
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
I agree. I think releasing these two films within 2 or so months of each other is a bad idea. This is why (for example) Warner Bros. only submitted/promoted The Matrix Reloaded for consideration so it wouldn't split any votes with Revolutions (not that it helped it). Or they could try to pull a Soderberg. But he was nominated for two vastly different films, and that doesn't happen often.

I'm looking forward more to Red Sun, Black Sand than Flags of our Fathers anyway. :)

I don't think both will be nominated. And even if he is nominated and the film is brilliant, I think there may be a little bit of a "we just awarded him two years ago" syndrome.


Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:09 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
You never know, it could end up being the better film. It's the more interesting concept, gotta have tons of respect for Eastwood to do something like that.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:11 pm
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:53 pm
Posts: 135
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
I think what they should do is release Red Sun, Black Sand after the Oscars, so if Eastwood's Flags does end up winning it should help out the movies BO tremendously, they shouldnt release the movie one or two months after Flags, it could hurt Flags oscar potential, but at the sametime it could also help. Hollywood would really appreciate such a bold move such as make two different movies in different perspectives.


I suspect Par will focus their efforts on getting Flags Academy attention and release Red Sun after the nomination period has expired. That way they can have both films in the marketplace, maximising buzz and audiences in the runup to the Oscars, but just one collecting votes. The trouble with putting two films into competion from the same director/company is that they end up competing against each other as well as other nominees. Why take that risk? Besides Red Sun is, as Eastwood has said, made for Japan. The cast are all huge stars over there and that Tokyo press conference attended by Eastwood and the cast recently had something like 150 cameramen and six hundred writers covering it. Red Sun looks like a huge deal for Japanese audiences and I'm not sure how much that's fully appreciated on this side of the world. So I'm pretty confident the world premiere will be in Japan and that will likely scotch any chance of a US December release. We'll see.


Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:30 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
andaroo wrote:
I agree. I think releasing these two films within 2 or so months of each other is a bad idea. This is why (for example) Warner Bros. only submitted/promoted The Matrix Reloaded for consideration so it wouldn't split any votes with Revolutions (not that it helped it). Or they could try to pull a Soderberg. But he was nominated for two vastly different films, and that doesn't happen often.



I don't know how about general promotion, but as far as Visual Effects go, I am pretty sure WB submitted Revolutions only (grave mistake).

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:32 pm
Profile WWW
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40601
Post 
Damn you Clint Eastwood! Marty's movie might not even make it to the big show judging by this though, so it won't be as heartbreaking.

I don't think The Good Shepard is dead quite yet though. All we've gotten is an AICN review saying it's too long, right? And even in that review, he said the movie was good, it just needed editing. Who knows.

I think Flags' biggest competitor will be something unknown though, at this point. A movie under the rader like MDB, or all the indies last year.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed Jun 07, 2006 6:54 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Honestly, usually movies that are considered "frontrunners" by this time of the year don't end up winning, so Eastwood fans should not be so excited. Last year, it were Memoirs of a Geisha and Munich, the year before the last it was The Aviator. Then other films came up rather unexpectedly and took the statue.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Jun 07, 2006 6:59 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.