Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 11:10 am



Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown 
Author Message
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
Rev wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Rev wrote:
It's going to be a Slumdog party tomorrow night. :D minimum of 8 oscars.


maximum of 9? :funny:


they only got 9 noms?? thought it was 10.


2 noms for song but the most it could possibly win is 9. Though that would require a sound sweep which isn't likely.


Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:46 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32635
Location: the last free city
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
I'll be happy with 8 :D

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:07 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
Quote:
The producers also have managed to insult last year's actor winners by deciding that France's Marion Cotillard (Best Actress for La Vie En Rose) and Spain's Javier Bardem (Best Supporting Actor for No Country For Old Men), Scotland's Tilda Swinton (Best Supporting Actress for Michael Clayton) and even England's Daniel Day-Lewis (Best Actor for There Will Be Blood) weren't big enough names to carry on the time-honored tradition of announcing this year's winners by themselves. So, I've learned, the unusual step will be taken to bring onstage in a group other past Best Actor or Best Supporting Actress winners in order to add more glitz and glamor to the presentations.



http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/o ... -shoulder/

full article

Quote:
The people who put on the Academy Awards are in a flopsweat panic as the hours tick away before this year's Academy Awards. For weeks now, they've been begging myself and the other journalists who cover the Oscars not to trash the planning and performances for this year's telecast like we have in years past. Because their frustration and fear is that, if Sunday's top-to-bottom reworked show can't bring back viewers after 2008's sunk to its lowest ratings ever, then nothing will.

And the worst part is that not even Hollywood wants to participate in the Oscars anymore. I can report that this year's producers are privately complaining that the biggest movie stars in the world like Jack Nicholson, Nicole Kidman, Angelina Jolie, and Kate Winslet gave them excuse after excuse about why they didn't want to present awards, once considered a huge honor. (For instance, Kidman said she wouldn't do the telecast without the "right" hairdresser. And Winslet, the Best Actress shoo-in, claimed she was too "nervous" to take it on.) One of the few big actresses who didn't balk was Reese Witherspoon.

These behind-the-scenes embarrassments are one reason why the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts And Sciences took the unprecedented step this year of failing to make public the list of Oscar presenters. There's even talk now of bringing back those official $100,000+ Oscar baskets of expensive freebies that used to be given to the show's presenters and performers (before Uncle Sam decided to tax them) as a way to bribe Hollywood into lending its star power. And the lack of major celebrities is one reason why the producers may finally be able to keep the show's running time to their goal of 3 hours and 15 minutes instead of the usual dragfest that has driven away TV audiences with every passing year.

But, in the process, the producers lost Peter Gabriel who refused to sing his Best Original Song from Wall-E, "Down To Earth", in what he claimed was the insulting allotted time of only 65 seconds for each of the 3 tunes in a medley. The producers also have managed to insult last year's actor winners by deciding that France's Marion Cotillard (Best Actress for La Vie En Rose) and Spain's Javier Bardem (Best Supporting Actor for No Country For Old Men), Scotland's Tilda Swinton (Best Supporting Actress for Michael Clayton) and even England's Daniel Day-Lewis (Best Actor for There Will Be Blood) weren't big enough names to carry on the time-honored tradition of announcing this year's winners by themselves.

So, I've learned, the unusual step will be taken to bring onstage in a group other past Best Actor or Best Supporting Actress winners in order to add more glitz and glamor to the presentations. (Not to mention that Australia's Heath Ledger won't be picking up his Best Supporting Actor award this year.) Oh, but don't worry: last year's winners will still get to open the envelope and announce who won. So much for this year's Academy Awards shaping up as the most international ever: AMPAS is truly concerned that Americans don't care about Bollywood's Slumdog Millionaire, the shoo-in for Best Picture, its director Danny Boyle for Best Director and other 2009 honors.

Even the choice of host this year, Australia's Hugh Jackman, was intended to pump up the overseas interest in the Oscars. But on Friday, people close to the X-Men and upcoming Wolverine star still felt the need to release a viral video on YouTube of a very buff Jackman, his biceps bulging, making fun of previous Oscar hosts as he rehearsed a song-and-dance number. And the fact that so many Oscar categories have been locked in since December, and therefore marquee nominees like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie locked out for months, have only added to the anxiety among organizers. They even tried, and failed, to convince celebrity publicists to bring clients around to a side entrance at the Kodak Theatre instead of onto the Red Carpet Sunday in order to keep secret what the stars would be wearing so it could be a surprise for the telecast.

One new idea thought up by the producers that will be seen Sunday? Trophy boys. The result is that very handsome young men will now join very beautiful young women on stage carrying out the Oscar statuettes. If that's not an acknowledgement that the viewership for the Academy Awards these days is limited to only females and gays, I don't know what is. Meanwhile, a group of online bloggers has led an audience boycott of the Oscars among the predominantly male fans of The Dark Knight because of the Academy voters' snub of the $1 billion-in-worldwide-grosses comic book caper for a Best Picture nomination and its Chris Nolan for Best Director.

And that's yet another problem that hurts viewership: this year, too, the most popular movies aren't in contention for the major category Academy Awards. That drives away younger viewers. So it's little wonder that ABC in this economic freefall scrambled to drop prices for 30-second ads and replace two of the key sponsors for its Sunday broadcast, General Motors and L'Oreal. Not even the prospect of 30+ million U.S. viewers could lure advertisers who've cut their TV budgets to the bone. Prices for Oscars spots averaged $1.7 million last year, but now are going for as cheap as $1.4 million. The result is that, in a departure from tradition, parent company Walt Disney had to let its rival movie studios buy time on the telecast. MORE LATER


Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:41 pm
Profile
Into the fray
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 1874
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
So the first test of the Slumdog sweep won't be until an hour into the show with Cinematography where it should win fairly easily, and then we have to wait another hour after that (2 hours into the show) until we get to Sound Editing. Sort of suspenseful.


Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:11 am
Profile WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
The prospect of very handsome young trophy boys got me.

Although they could very well be tween Disney Channel stars. Blech.

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:47 am
Profile
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6333
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
This is going to be an absolutely epic disaster. But at least they're straying away from the forumula.

_________________
.


Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:44 am
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
I'm disappointed we won't see Tilda, Marion, Javier, and Daniel. :(

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:50 pm
Profile
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post Re: SPOILER ALERT!: Complete Oscar Production Rundown
Gunslinger wrote:
I'm disappointed we won't see Tilda, Marion, Javier, and Daniel. :(


Oh. I thought the article said they'll be there... just presenting with partners.

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:29 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.