|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
Quote: Children of Men - Birth Sequence
Tim Webber, Lucy Killick, Andy Kind, Craig Bardsley
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
John Knoll, Ned Gorman, Jakub Pistecky, Tom Fejes
Poseidon
Boyd Shermis, Rhonda Gunner, Kim Libreri, Philippe Rebours
X-Men: The Last Stand
Eric Saindon, Cyndi Ochs, GG Heitmann, Roger Shortt They specify which single effect for Children of Men but not for the other ones? It's an award for an individual specific effect, why don't they tell us which one?
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:50 pm |
 
|
|
|
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
|
Maybe I dont appreciate water effects but you seen one wave you seen them all. Its just a waste of money putting too much detail into water splashes wheter its Masters & Commanders or a Perfect Storm. Its as much of a waste as digitizing a dead actors face into a movie part (Brando's face costing an upwards of 20 million into SR)
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:58 pm |
|
|
|
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
|
Quote: Outstanding Supporting Visual Effects in a Motion Picture
Funny.
Pirates got snubbed from the big one, yo.
_________________
k
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:01 pm |
|
|
|
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
|
Woot! Go Children Of Men!
Surprising, yet nonetheless pleasant, to see The Fountain get some love.
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:20 pm |
|
|
|
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40527
|
I'm kind of surprised Casino and Superman got in over Pirates.  _________________Shackâs top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:30 pm |
|
|
|
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
|
Shack wrote: I'm kind of surprised Casino and Superman got in over Pirates. Superman maybe
Casino Royale heck no.
What was really visually stunning about the film, I dont. Were the spades shaded differently than the other cards? Was it because the stuntmen were reminiscent of 70s tv style fighting complete with jumping off top of the ceiling and next shot having them roll on the ground ala Charlie's Angels, Magnum PI?
Heck I think they used the whole CR budget and snorted it through their nose
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:35 pm |
|
|
|
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
|
Pretty much all of the effects in Casino Royale are invisible, which surely is the best kind.
And unless I'm crazy, 'special effects' doesn't solely mean CGI noise. Some of you guys seem to forget that. Model work? SPECIAL EFFECT.
_________________
k
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:37 pm |
|
|
|
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
|
El_Masked_fuerte_grande wrote: Maybe I dont appreciate water effects but you seen one wave you seen them all. Its just a waste of money putting too much detail into water splashes wheter its Masters & Commanders or a Perfect Storm. Its as much of a waste as digitizing a dead actors face into a movie part (Brando's face costing an upwards of 20 million into SR) It was such a big leap from Perfect Storm to Master and Commander. And since there are still many movie is which digitized water looks crap and unintentionally funny (hello The Guardian) that it still deserves merit if someone gets it right
|
| Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:52 pm |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
