Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 5:33 pm



Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 NBR Announced! 
Author Message
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 429
Location: A place, where birds sing a pretty song and there's always music in the air
Post 
Go Clint!!!! :hahaha: Amazing! Now Queen is out of the race, altough a nod is possible. We have Letters, Departed and Dreamgirls. Remember that NBR have never liked musicals, they prefer dramas, that's why I'm surprised that Little Children isn't in the top 10.

_________________
"This city deserves a better class of criminal and I'm gonna give it to them"

1 billion, come on hit me!


Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:04 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Alfred wrote:
Remember that NBR have never liked musicals, they prefer dramas.


I'd say that's a myth. Moulin Rouge won NBR, and Chicago was in their top 10.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:34 pm
Profile WWW
The French Dutch Boy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 10266
Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
Post 
Alfred wrote:
Now Queen is out of the race, altough a nod is possible.


That's not technically true. A Beautiful Mind did not make the NBR top 10 list yet went on to be nominated and WIN at the Oscars.

Peace,
Mike.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:37 pm
Profile
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Alfred wrote:
Remember that NBR have never liked musicals, they prefer dramas.


I'd say that's a myth. Moulin Rouge won NBR, and Chicago was in their top 10.


Yeah if anything, (recently) they like Musicals or British films.

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:42 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Having Notes on a Scandal in but not The Queen does look bad (both with British veterans), but maybe they thought Mirren is enough of a representation. If Mirren had lost to Kate or Cruz, I'd be very worried. Right now I will resist the urge to make too much out of NBR and see what transpire in the next week; the award season is just getting started.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:12 pm
Profile WWW
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
Yeah, as fun as it is to see winners finally, we still have many, many precursors to go. Movies start falling out of the race once the Globes announce.


Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:29 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
Post 
Okay... just saw the list and I'm super-excited. This makes the race ALOT more interesting. I know it's only the beginning but ah well, we have much to discuss! :biggrin:

1. Shocked with Letters taking top spot. The only way a Clint movie is NOT going to get nominated is f FOOF and LFIJ split the vote.

2. Solidifies The Departed's nod (as if it weren't solid enough) and as of now, keeps it as the front-runner with the absence of Dreamgirls.

3. Little Miss Sunshine is almost locked up as well. There's no way GG nods next week can hurt; it will either keep it at its place or make it a stronger contender.

4. The Queen: After seeing it (I gave it an A), I knew there was no chance it could ever take the win. It's one of those small films that's almost flawless but it has no big 'it' factor. I think it's still good enough for a nod unless the next month really kills its buzz.

The Oscar nominees at this point should be...

The Departed
Dreamgirls
Letters from Iwo Jima/Flags of our Fathers
Little Miss Sunshine
The Queen
(Babel will get in if Eastwood films split the vote)

I just don't see any other vuable contenders at this point. Volver has an outside chance but the Foreign Lanuage category really deters me from placing it in this list of contenders.

5. Little Children should be out of the race now. It's box office isn't impressive. It's reception/WOM isn't the best, and it just never build up enough buzz to really go anywhere. Unfortunately, that may affect Winslet's chances ata nomination... but I still think she's one of the top contenders for the last 2 spots (top 3 being Mirren, Streep, and Cruz).

6. I really am quite baffled with Notes on a Scandal, History Boys, and Painted Veil mentions on that list. Happy to see Devil Wears Prada up there (YAYY). Blood Diamond seems to have strong support among a few (just saw Roeper's review the other day) but I don't think the numbers will be enough for it to be a serious contender.

_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man

Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine


Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:41 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
Yay at No Dreamgirls. Booh at No United 93.

The Queen should not be in BP contention anymore. As I said all along, the movie is her performance which mean she'll win every awards thrown in her way, but the picture won't be nominated. It's "Monster" with a Queen instead of a serial killer


Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:02 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Monster didn't come close to The Queen in term of reviews:

Metacritic - 75 for Monster with 1 100 (Ebert), 91 for The Queen with 12 100s;
RT - 80% with 7.1 average for Monster, 98% with 8.4 average for The Queen;
BFCA - 89 for Monster and 95 for The Queen

It's actually absurd to compare the two. The Queen remains a strong contender for a nom just because it is one of the best, if not the best, reviewed films of the year with strong box office. Last year, people thought Capote, and to some degree Crash, was dead after GG ignored them. To make such a big statement after just NBR is way too premature.

EDIT: more, even go by the content of the reviews instead of numbers, you should see they are very different between Monster, which basically just talked about Theron, and The Queen, which is called one of the best films of the year by many critics and has them spent a lot more inks on aspects other than Mirren.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:38 am
Profile WWW
We had our time together
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 13299
Location: Vienna
Post 
What's crap like World Trade Center searching there?


Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:07 am
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Monster didn't come close to The Queen in term of reviews:

Metacritic - 75 for Monster with 1 100 (Ebert), 91 for The Queen with 12 100s;
RT - 80% with 7.1 average for Monster, 98% with 8.4 average for The Queen;
BFCA - 89 for Monster and 95 for The Queen

It's actually absurd to compare the two. The Queen remains a strong contender for a nom just because it is one of the best, if not the best, reviewed films of the year with strong box office. Last year, people thought Capote, and to some degree Crash, was dead after GG ignored them. To make such a big statement after just NBR is way too premature.

EDIT: more, even go by the content of the reviews instead of numbers, you should see they are very different between Monster, which basically just talked about Theron, and The Queen, which is called one of the best films of the year by many critics and has them spent a lot more inks on aspects other than Mirren.


I just meant that it i such a overpowering performance that people might thight "Wow. Mirren is awesome, but without her it wouldn't be such a perfect movie". And since evryone knows she's going to win the Oscar, there's no need to reward the movie. I've said all along The Queen won't get a BP nomination and so far, I'm sticking to it.


Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:21 am
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Monster didn't come close to The Queen in term of reviews:

Metacritic - 75 for Monster with 1 100 (Ebert), 91 for The Queen with 12 100s;
RT - 80% with 7.1 average for Monster, 98% with 8.4 average for The Queen;
BFCA - 89 for Monster and 95 for The Queen

It's actually absurd to compare the two. The Queen remains a strong contender for a nom just because it is one of the best, if not the best, reviewed films of the year with strong box office. Last year, people thought Capote, and to some degree Crash, was dead after GG ignored them. To make such a big statement after just NBR is way too premature.

EDIT: more, even go by the content of the reviews instead of numbers, you should see they are very different between Monster, which basically just talked about Theron, and The Queen, which is called one of the best films of the year by many critics and has them spent a lot more inks on aspects other than Mirren.


I just meant that it i such a overpowering performance that people might thight "Wow. Mirren is awesome, but without her it wouldn't be such a perfect movie". And since evryone knows she's going to win the Oscar, there's no need to reward the movie. I've said all along The Queen won't get a BP nomination and so far, I'm sticking to it.


Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:21 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Levy wrote:

I just meant that it i such a overpowering performance that people might thight "Wow. Mirren is awesome, but without her it wouldn't be such a perfect movie". And since evryone knows she's going to win the Oscar, there's no need to reward the movie. I've said all along The Queen won't get a BP nomination and so far, I'm sticking to it.


But isn't it the same thing could be said about Capote or Ray?

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:35 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Levy wrote:

I just meant that it i such a overpowering performance that people might thight "Wow. Mirren is awesome, but without her it wouldn't be such a perfect movie". And since evryone knows she's going to win the Oscar, there's no need to reward the movie. I've said all along The Queen won't get a BP nomination and so far, I'm sticking to it.


But isn't it the same thing could be said about Capote or Ray?


Yeah, but this year's competition might be a tad stronger


Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:12 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Levy wrote:
xiayun wrote:
Levy wrote:

I just meant that it i such a overpowering performance that people might thight "Wow. Mirren is awesome, but without her it wouldn't be such a perfect movie". And since evryone knows she's going to win the Oscar, there's no need to reward the movie. I've said all along The Queen won't get a BP nomination and so far, I'm sticking to it.


But isn't it the same thing could be said about Capote or Ray?


Yeah, but this year's competition might be a tad stronger


I think that was the argument for Walk the Line's snubbing, which at this point last year everyone considered it to be just as much of a lock as The Queen because of the acting.


Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:08 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Better late than never...

Impressive for Letters from Iwo Jima. Looks like the battle for the last two spots (I still consider Dreamgirls, The Quuen and The Departed for granted) will be between an Eastwood flick, Little Miss Sunshine and United 93.

VERY weird Top 10 list, though.

The History Boys?!?! Babel?!?! Notes on a Scandal?!?!

I gotta wonder, though whether The Psinted Veil will end up in contention for some awards. I mean it looks good and it does look a bit baity. The cast is top-notch. Who knows... I certainly could see a nom for Watts.

Forest Whitaker's chances are somewhat increased now, I think with The Pursuit of Happyness faltering with reviewers and WB somehow screwing up Leo for The Departed (and Blood Diamond not seeming to make such a dent at the box-office or with reviewers). So, either Whtiaker or O'Toole at this point, IMO.

The Departed is a true winner, though with Berst Director/Best Ensemble wins and a Top 10 placement.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:51 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.