Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 2:35 am



Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 Full Nomination List 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
I agree that it is a disgrace that Danny Elfman hasn't won an oscar yet.

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:50 pm
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Raffiki wrote:
I actually think King Kong was snubbed from a Cinematography nod. :nonono:

Art Direction and Visual Effects were deserved.
I don't really know the sound categories or how they judge and I don't really care, so I wouldn't mind trading in those two nods for a cinem. nod.


Art Direction and Visual FX for KONG were more deserving than SITH???? That Lava Planet and Lightsaber fight around it had better FX in that 1 scene alone than KONG did throughout the whole movie..

And WALK THE LINE being snubbed for BEST PICTURE over BAREASS MOUNTAIN is a travesty to.. Perhaps if there were Gay sex involved in WALK THE LINE it would've been more of a contender.. :disgust:


Crash=no gay sex
Munich=no gay sex
Good Night and Good Luck=no sex at all
Capote=a homosexual character but no sex at all


Oh come on!! You can't possible deny that the subject matter and it's Boldness in BARECRACK MOUNTAIN and it's portrayal of 2 Gay Cowboys didn't cause this film to lead in it's campaign for a BEST PICTURE Win.. It's so blatantly obvious that it's the subject matter that will win BEST PICTURE in this movie more then the Quality itself.. They could've chosen a Man/Woman storyline and this movie wouldn't even be mentioned..


Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:18 am
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Raffiki wrote:
I actually think King Kong was snubbed from a Cinematography nod. :nonono:

Art Direction and Visual Effects were deserved.
I don't really know the sound categories or how they judge and I don't really care, so I wouldn't mind trading in those two nods for a cinem. nod.


Art Direction and Visual FX for KONG were more deserving than SITH???? That Lava Planet and Lightsaber fight around it had better FX in that 1 scene alone than KONG did throughout the whole movie..

And WALK THE LINE being snubbed for BEST PICTURE over BAREASS MOUNTAIN is a travesty to.. Perhaps if there were Gay sex involved in WALK THE LINE it would've been more of a contender.. :disgust:


Crash=no gay sex
Munich=no gay sex
Good Night and Good Luck=no sex at all
Capote=a homosexual character but no sex at all


Oh come on!! You can't possible deny that the subject matter and it's Boldness in BARECRACK MOUNTAIN and it's portrayal of 2 Gay Cowboys didn't cause this film to lead in it's campaign for a BEST PICTURE Win.. It's so blatantly obvious that it's the subject matter that will win BEST PICTURE in this movie more then the Quality itself.. They could've chosen a Man/Woman storyline and this movie wouldn't even be mentioned..


I agree! Even better, Walk the line would have the oscars locked, LOCKED I TELL YOU, if it also had death penalty, Tv anchors, palestinian terrorists and Sandra Bullock. MORTAL LOCK!!!

_________________
You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri

Image


What Mixed Drink Are You?

http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/


Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:58 am
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Rachel McAdams will be hosting the technical Oscars.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4679174.stm


Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:59 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Groucho wrote:
I agree that it is a disgrace that Danny Elfman hasn't won an oscar yet.


I agree.

He deserved a nom for Corpse Bride this year.

I wonder whether John Williams will get over 100 nominations in his lifetime, hehehe. I mean he is at what, 44?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:00 am
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40253
Post 
I'm actually going to side a wee bit with BKB here.

If it wasn't about gay cowboys, I don't think it would be thisssss much of the giant frontrunner. The subject matter helped to give it a hype and awareness boost that it wouldn't have had otherwise, and from there a lot of critics recognized it for it's political meaning. Of course with Ang Lee, and great Ledger Gylennhall and Williams acting, it still would've probably been nominated for Best Picture. But it's road would've been a lot harder, and Crash would probably have a leg up on it by now.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:23 am
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Shack wrote:
I'm actually going to side a wee bit with BKB here.

If it wasn't about gay cowboys, I don't think it would be thisssss much of the giant frontrunner. The subject matter helped to give it a hype and awareness boost that it wouldn't have had otherwise, and from there a lot of critics recognized it for it's political meaning. Of course with Ang Lee, and great Ledger Gylennhall and Williams acting, it still would've probably been nominated for Best Picture. But it's road would've been a lot harder, and Crash would probably have a leg up on it by now.


I don't understand this argument.

If it wasn't about gay cowboys, the film would not exist in the first place.


Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:50 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
It's not like story about forbidden love has never won critical acclaims before. I mean, Titanic is about forbidden love. It's not necessarily that if the story had been about heterosexual love, it must become another The Notebook (loved by people but generally ignored by critics). Also, I agree with Libs, if the story had actually been about a man and a woman, the entire script would have been different. I can't see how one can say "make everything stay the same, but only change the sex" since it can't happen in reality.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:59 am
Profile WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Libs wrote:
Shack wrote:
I'm actually going to side a wee bit with BKB here.

If it wasn't about gay cowboys, I don't think it would be thisssss much of the giant frontrunner. The subject matter helped to give it a hype and awareness boost that it wouldn't have had otherwise, and from there a lot of critics recognized it for it's political meaning. Of course with Ang Lee, and great Ledger Gylennhall and Williams acting, it still would've probably been nominated for Best Picture. But it's road would've been a lot harder, and Crash would probably have a leg up on it by now.


I don't understand this argument.

If it wasn't about gay cowboys, the film would not exist in the first place.


Also how can a gay cowboy film be perceived to be a giant frontrunner because of that subject matter? How many gay cowboy movies have made a splash at the Oscars?

If anything, the subject matter would have turned off plenty of members.

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:21 am
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:01 pm
Posts: 1702
Post 
Christian wrote:
Libs wrote:
Shack wrote:
I'm actually going to side a wee bit with BKB here.

If it wasn't about gay cowboys, I don't think it would be thisssss much of the giant frontrunner. The subject matter helped to give it a hype and awareness boost that it wouldn't have had otherwise, and from there a lot of critics recognized it for it's political meaning. Of course with Ang Lee, and great Ledger Gylennhall and Williams acting, it still would've probably been nominated for Best Picture. But it's road would've been a lot harder, and Crash would probably have a leg up on it by now.


I don't understand this argument.

If it wasn't about gay cowboys, the film would not exist in the first place.


Also how can a gay cowboy film be perceived to be a giant frontrunner because of that subject matter? How many gay cowboy movies have made a splash at the Oscars?

If anything, the subject matter would have turned off plenty of members.


Exactly.

In fact, forget about the cowboys. Any gay film, period. But the "cowboy thing" didn´t help... how many jokes about it have we heard? People were ready to take the piss off the film. The fact that is the BP frontrunner is a huge accomplishment.

I wonder if, ten years from now if the movie wins BP, people will still be going on about this... "Oh yeah, that movie only won cause It was about gay cowboys... so Oscar-baity!"

_________________
You Are a Strawberry Daiquiri

Image


What Mixed Drink Are You?

http://www.blogthings.com/whatmixeddrinkareyouquiz/


Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 am
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 2913
Location: Portugal
Post 
dar wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Libs wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Raffiki wrote:
I actually think King Kong was snubbed from a Cinematography nod. :nonono:

Art Direction and Visual Effects were deserved.
I don't really know the sound categories or how they judge and I don't really care, so I wouldn't mind trading in those two nods for a cinem. nod.


Art Direction and Visual FX for KONG were more deserving than SITH???? That Lava Planet and Lightsaber fight around it had better FX in that 1 scene alone than KONG did throughout the whole movie..

And WALK THE LINE being snubbed for BEST PICTURE over BAREASS MOUNTAIN is a travesty to.. Perhaps if there were Gay sex involved in WALK THE LINE it would've been more of a contender.. :disgust:


Crash=no gay sex
Munich=no gay sex
Good Night and Good Luck=no sex at all
Capote=a homosexual character but no sex at all


Oh come on!! You can't possible deny that the subject matter and it's Boldness in BARECRACK MOUNTAIN and it's portrayal of 2 Gay Cowboys didn't cause this film to lead in it's campaign for a BEST PICTURE Win.. It's so blatantly obvious that it's the subject matter that will win BEST PICTURE in this movie more then the Quality itself.. They could've chosen a Man/Woman storyline and this movie wouldn't even be mentioned..


I agree! Even better, Walk the line would have the oscars locked, LOCKED I TELL YOU, if it also had death penalty, Tv anchors, palestinian terrorists and Sandra Bullock. MORTAL LOCK!!!


Sandra Bullock falling from the stairs and then realizing that her best friend is her transexual maid, played by Felicity Huffman. Now that would be something... :biggrin:


Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:25 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.