Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:17 pm



Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy 

What grade would you give this film?
A 22%  22%  [ 7 ]
B 41%  41%  [ 13 ]
C 22%  22%  [ 7 ]
D 9%  9%  [ 3 ]
F 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 32

 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy 
Author Message
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
Snrub wrote:
A

I loved it. There were some weak points (I wasn't a big fan of Freeman's Dent, or the first 15 minutes in general), but it's one of those films where the whole is much greater than the sum of its parts. I may write a full review if I can be bothered, if only because I disagree with baba so strongly.

Stupid baba.


stupid brit!


Mon May 02, 2005 12:21 pm
Profile WWW
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post 
l highly disliked it. highly.


Mon May 02, 2005 12:29 pm
Profile
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Gimli the Elf wrote:
Snrub wrote:
A

I loved it. There were some weak points (I wasn't a big fan of Freeman's Dent, or the first 15 minutes in general), but it's one of those films where the whole is much greater than the sum of its parts. I may write a full review if I can be bothered, if only because I disagree with baba so strongly.

Stupid baba.


stupid brit!


I honestly don't see how anyone could be disappointed. I went to see it on Saturday with a friend (incidentally, the biggest Hitchhiker's fan I know), and we both adored it with a passion. It was so tonally correct, endlessly imaginitive and perfectly cast that any shortcomings or liberties they took didn't detract from the end result. I even liked the love story!

And Sam Rockwell was perfect.


Mon May 02, 2005 12:43 pm
Profile
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
Snrub wrote:
Gimli the Elf wrote:
Snrub wrote:
A

I loved it. There were some weak points (I wasn't a big fan of Freeman's Dent, or the first 15 minutes in general), but it's one of those films where the whole is much greater than the sum of its parts. I may write a full review if I can be bothered, if only because I disagree with baba so strongly.

Stupid baba.


stupid brit!


I honestly don't see how anyone could be disappointed. I went to see it on Saturday with a friend (incidentally, the biggest Hitchhiker's fan I know), and we both adored it with a passion. It was so tonally correct, endlessly imaginitive and perfectly cast that any shortcomings or liberties they took didn't detract from the end result. I even liked the love story!

And Sam Rockwell was perfect.


I put it down very clearly in my review. But I'm glad you enjoyed it. The important thing is, someone got their money's worth.


Mon May 02, 2005 1:34 pm
Profile WWW
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Gimli the Elf wrote:
I put it down very clearly in my review. But I'm glad you enjoyed it. The important thing is, someone got their money's worth.


Well maybe I should actually read your review then, huh!? How do you like those apples?!

*reads review*

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong! Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong! You're wrong!


Mon May 02, 2005 1:53 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
7/10 (B-)

I was surprised by this one. I thought it would be one of the year's worst and I ended up really enjoying it (aside from Sam Rockwell's horrendous and annoying performance)


Mon May 02, 2005 10:54 pm
Profile YIM
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
The thing is, if people got what they say they want... all the madcap gags from the book, the movie would be an even more incoherant mess.

The focused their time on making things like the whale special, making the entries special, cutting in order to save what is left of a plot.

It's not perfect, but I also don't understand the lukewarm reception.


Wed May 04, 2005 2:35 am
Profile WWW
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am
Posts: 16278
Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
Post 
It started out with promise... it reminded me of Monty Python and the Holy Grail in some ways. But, as loyal mentioned, the movie lost a lot of steam as it went on, and by the end it felt very flat. The 3 lead actors were very uninspiring to me, and I felt they could have done so much more with the concept.

But, at the same time it wasn't terrible and it did have it's moments. It was easy to watch.

C+

_________________
Image


Mon May 16, 2005 6:54 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
loyalfromlondon wrote:
This is a tough one to grade. I'm not as versed in the material as other people but at the same time, I don't think that's a really big issue. All adaptations deal with finding that middle ground, Hitchhiker's is no different.

It's funny at times but some of the jokes fall flat as well. Zooey Deschanel, Martin Freeman, Mos Def, and Alan Rickman all do great work. Sam Rockwell didn't really work for me, I didn't get him. And I'm not sure why John Malkovich is even in the film.

It's a very average film for me, leaning towards the lower half of the C scale.

C/C-


Ditto.

Not knowing any of the material beforehand was not an advantage. Considering most fans were dissapointed with the film, I thought it could have been better for a non-fan. Unfortunately, it was the opposite.

I hardly laughed at all in this film. Almost every joke fell flat. But, Mos Def, Martin Freeman, and even Sam Rockwell were decent enough to make a bad movie a little better.

Overall, though, boring and mediocre. C-


Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:07 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
B


Well, I am not familiar with the source material, but I must say that I did enjoy this adaptation quite a bit. I heard lots of things about it. Many good ones, but also some terrible ones. For one, I did not find this film funny. Usually, I am a fan of British humor, but this one didn't really make me laugh even once. As a comedy it failed for me in every possible way.

For another, the movie often loses its focus. What's up with that random John Malkovich appearance that doesn't re-occur later on despite it being somewhat crucial to the plot. The movie doesn't tie up loose ends.

But that aside, it was a decent and most of all very imaginative movie. Despite the rather moderate budget, I was surprised by the good effects and the great production design. The spaceship, the alien worlds, the aliens themselves were all well-done, even if sometimes ridiculously weird. The cast mostly did a decent job. I liked Rockwell, but he has done the same stuff before in other movies. Freeman was decent and the best thing was that he actually had some chemistry with Zooey Deschanel and of course Marvin stood out. The ending was a bit abrupt and seemed...off, but overall it was an enjoyable, even though quite flawed, experience.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:48 pm
Profile WWW
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11009
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post 
A very funny movie, but its story stucter hurt it from getting a B+, so it gets a

B

_________________
Image


Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:51 am
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28293
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
Hmm... I feel like an odd man out for thoroughly enjoying this movie. I sadly never read of the material, but I still enjoyed this film on its own immensely.

Grade: A

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:49 pm
Profile
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
A-

When I saw it in the theaters I was a little less impressed, some of the casting choices were not what I pictured as a fan of the books and the whole story is very compressed. But on second viewing I appreciated it more for what it is, not what I had expected, and what it is, is one of the most creative movies of the year. I've come to really like Sam Rockwell's take on Zaphod and I think time will be generous to this movie.

The minus because it's not quite as funny as it wants to be. But it oozes likeability, creativity and cast chemistry.

By the way the DVD for this has a fun commentary by the director, Freeman and Nighy.


Tue Dec 27, 2005 2:55 am
Profile WWW
Iron Man

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 9:15 pm
Posts: 622
Post 
The beginning was fantastic and I thought it would end up being a great movie. I was wrong. From then on, it became clear that it was an unfunny, and at times stupid, mess. The visual effects, however, were fantastic. D


Tue Dec 27, 2005 1:39 pm
Profile
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6139
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
A wild, unpredictable and hilarious sci-fi spoof. The actors all do good jobs and the film has some very clever moments of humor. Some stuff doesn't work, but the visuals are very imaginative and its highly entertaining.

A

_________________
.


Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:22 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
ZOOEY!!!

:wub2:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:27 pm
Profile
Speed Racer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 172
Location: Argentina
Post Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Loved the book, loved the movie. So underrated.

8/10 (B+)

_________________
Image


Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:28 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11009
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Yes it is very much underate. B+

_________________
Image


Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:35 pm
Profile
The Wall
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 16163
Location: Croatia
Post Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
7/10 -> B-

I avoided this because of the bad response it got when it got out.. I finally saw it at the beginning of this year and I was pleasantly surpised. It's not a great adaptation, but it's a good one.


Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 238 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.