Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 1:32 am



Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
 The Rules of Attraction 

What grade would you give this film?
A 27%  27%  [ 3 ]
B 27%  27%  [ 3 ]
C 18%  18%  [ 2 ]
D 27%  27%  [ 3 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 11

 The Rules of Attraction 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post The Rules of Attraction
The Rules of Attraction

Image

Quote:
The Rules of Attraction is a 2002 satirical dark comedy film directed by Roger Avary, based on the novel of the same name by Bret Easton Ellis. It stars James van der Beek, Shannyn Sossamon, Ian Somerhalder, Jessica Biel, and Kip Pardue.


Sun May 08, 2005 10:35 am
Profile
We had our time together
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 13299
Location: Vienna
Post 
Awesome. Loved it. A


Sun May 08, 2005 3:24 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
Post 
Loved it as well. I appreciated the opening sequence and I liked how the characters were explored during the film.
Plus, the Carrot Top commentary on the dvd is Priceless.

_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN

45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm


Sun May 08, 2005 4:05 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14624
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
Image

After hearing the immense amount of positive buzz about THE RULES OF ATTRACTION, I rented it with a lot of anticipation. It sounded sexy and interesting and featured several talented actors, including up-and-coming stars Jessica Biel and Kate Bosworth. However, when I watched it, I got something completely different than I was expecting. Marketed as an offbeat teenage comedy-drama, this was in fact a mind bending and sexually provocative film. It was very unorthodox and not mainstream in the slightest, which is the main reason I believed it bombed in theatrical release. It features a lot of great performances, especially from lead James Van Der Beek, but in the end it's just too strange and weird for its own good. Solid but overrated.

6/10 (B-)


Sun May 08, 2005 4:56 pm
Profile YIM
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
Kickass flick!

8/10 (B+)

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Sun May 08, 2005 5:06 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Online
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 19424
Location: San Diego
Post 
Very shallow film but I somehow really enjoyed it... I won't give a grade for now.


Sun May 08, 2005 8:43 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Miseable and bordering on offensive. You know in a movie where the first scene involvs an annoying girl passing out in a party and waking up to have someone raping her who throws up on her while being on video, that you're in for something that is either gravely insightful, or promenading horrific situations around on screen in a desperate attempt to come off as profound. Tasteless, and lacking redeeming qualities (kinda like Kids) Attraction doesn't even bother with trying to make a general statement about STD's. It instead tries to use these vastly manipulative and horrific situations to do character sketches. It fails miserably, since the characters are all pretty abnoxious and lack depth. They just mope alot.

D


Tue May 10, 2005 1:07 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
Wow, I'm surprised more people didn't like this ...

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Tue May 10, 2005 1:28 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
I really like this movie, eventhough it switched chapters (Victor's storyline) and plots around, deviating it from Bret Easton Ellis' novel. I really wish that Christian Bale had reprised his Patrick Bateman role here.

Favorite Moment: Faye Dunaway and Swoosie Kurtz as rich, alcoholic geezers.

B+

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sat May 14, 2005 5:32 am
Profile
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
Miseable and bordering on offensive. You know in a movie where the first scene involvs an annoying girl passing out in a party and waking up to have someone raping her who throws up on her while being on video, that you're in for something that is either gravely insightful, or promenading horrific situations around on screen in a desperate attempt to come off as profound. Tasteless, and lacking redeeming qualities (kinda like Kids) Attraction doesn't even bother with trying to make a general statement about STD's. It instead tries to use these vastly manipulative and horrific situations to do character sketches. It fails miserably, since the characters are all pretty abnoxious and lack depth. They just mope alot.

D


I absolutely agree with everything you are saying here, and I would give it the same grade as well.

It might be known as a cult classic, but its just overrated trash in my opinion. Definitely nothing to praise about.


Sat May 14, 2005 5:50 am
Profile YIM WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Steamboat Willie wrote:

I absolutely agree with everything you are saying here, and I would give it the same grade as well.

It might be known as a cult classic, but its just overrated trash in my opinion. Definitely nothing to praise about.


I don't think anyone is saying this is "cult classic."

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sat May 14, 2005 5:28 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
Valley Guy 3.0 wrote:
Steamboat Willie wrote:

I absolutely agree with everything you are saying here, and I would give it the same grade as well.

It might be known as a cult classic, but its just overrated trash in my opinion. Definitely nothing to praise about.


I don't think anyone is saying this is "cult classic."


Most people on movie boards say that it is a cult classic and I am one of the people that definetely consider it one.

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Sat May 14, 2005 5:44 pm
Profile YIM WWW
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
movies35 wrote:
Valley Guy 3.0 wrote:
Steamboat Willie wrote:

I absolutely agree with everything you are saying here, and I would give it the same grade as well.

It might be known as a cult classic, but its just overrated trash in my opinion. Definitely nothing to praise about.


I don't think anyone is saying this is "cult classic."


Most people on movie boards say that it is a cult classic and I am one of the people that definetely consider it one.


Thank you! See people everywhere are calling this a cult classic. :roll:


Sat May 14, 2005 10:51 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Steamboat Willie wrote:
movies35 wrote:
Valley Guy 3.0 wrote:
Steamboat Willie wrote:

I absolutely agree with everything you are saying here, and I would give it the same grade as well.

It might be known as a cult classic, but its just overrated trash in my opinion. Definitely nothing to praise about.


I don't think anyone is saying this is "cult classic."


Most people on movie boards say that it is a cult classic and I am one of the people that definetely consider it one.


Thank you! See people everywhere are calling this a cult classic. :roll:


Fine. You guys win. :wink:

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sun May 15, 2005 3:41 am
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 2913
Location: Portugal
Post 
Huge bump..

In what it could have been a MAJOR mistake due to the love it/hate it status surronding this flick, I blind bought this - yeah, I'm crazy (and I usually don't do this? but it was very cheap for a special edition, so I thought "What the hell - if I don't like it, I offer it to someone as a gift :biggrin: ")


... and I loved it :happy:

People calling it shallow are so missing the point, lol.. even though I totally, and I mean totally understand the hate around this, this is really the true anti-teen movie, going deeper and deeper than the other shallow teen movies.. and most of all, refusing to play safe..

The cast is all incredible, the use of music couldn't be any better, the screenplay is very deranged, but in a good ("Tarantinesque") way - after all, this was the same guy who co-wrote Pulp Fiction with Tarantino, and the editing is one of the best works of this decade so far..

The beginning-ending, the first meeting with the split-scren, the Dick character ( :lol: ), the suicide sequence and the eurotrip (among others) are all so memorable that I doubt even the haters forgot them..


A-


Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:24 am
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Ambitious, but ugly and meandering. D+


Sat Dec 24, 2005 10:44 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
A-


It is not a movie for everyone and I don't expect everyone to love it or even like it. I know I did. It is provocative, not very deep and outrageous at times, but it did hit the right notes for me. I enjoy Bret Easton Ellis' style and I feel that this work was adapted here very well, just like it was in American Psycho. I would have never thought that James Van Der Beek could have pulled it off, but hell he did a great job as Jason Bateman. Roger Avary did a great job directing the movie and I loved its visual style and the editing/cinematography with Victor's travellogue being the best example of it. It is certainly a case of a love/hate movie and I happen to be in the love camp. I thought that the culture portrayed in the movie was mostly well represented.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:55 pm
Profile WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Christian wrote:
Steamboat Willie wrote:
movies35 wrote:
Valley Guy 3.0 wrote:
Steamboat Willie wrote:

I absolutely agree with everything you are saying here, and I would give it the same grade as well.

It might be known as a cult classic, but its just overrated trash in my opinion. Definitely nothing to praise about.


I don't think anyone is saying this is "cult classic."


Most people on movie boards say that it is a cult classic and I am one of the people that definetely consider it one.


Thank you! See people everywhere are calling this a cult classic. :roll:


Fine. You guys win. :wink:


Wow, what a hilarious argument.

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:58 pm
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:16 pm
Posts: 192
Post 
One Wild Movie!

A-

_________________
Image
See Hard Candy!


Mon May 01, 2006 8:52 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
Libs wrote:
Ambitious, but ugly and meandering. D+



lol!

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Mon May 01, 2006 8:54 pm
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
A difficult movie to grade. On the one hand, it's quite disturbing, overtly confusing, and utterly pointless. On the other, it's darkly comical, occasionally brilliant, and frequently hilarious. Definitely one of a kind. Some parts of it are disgusting in their offensiveness, whilst others are incredible in their wit. Some of the comic gems are Victor's recap of his Eurotrip and the character of Dick - who has a brilliant, five minute showing, and then never shows up again. The plot winds about, making little to no sense but capturing attentions anyway. The characters are sad, pathetic, and deeply intriguing. The cinematography and editing are a bit flashy but worthy of it. The music is well-chosen but can be a bit over the top at times. All in all, a wildly original and depressingly dark film.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:18 am
Profile
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35248
Location: Minnesota
Post Re: The Rules of Attraction
I absolutely love this film. Saw it theatrically opening weekend, bought the DVD right away upon release, and then bought the Blu-ray when that came out. Both the book and film are favorites of mine. The characters are incredibly intriguing and the style of the film is stunning. Not the easiest of novels to adapt into film, I really can't complain at all with the job Roger Avary has done. There are some changes from the novel (when aren't there?) but I don't really think the film could have been adapted any better. So many great scenes in this. The split-screen scene, the dinner, suicide, Victor's vacation, and the finale are all favorites.

It's a dark and funny satire, but also very sad and kind of beautiful. One of 2002's best.

9/10 (A)


Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:49 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
Post Re: The Rules of Attraction
Magicmike gets the HUGE bump achievement. That was a 6 year gap.

I still like the movie and the carrottop commentary as I repeat my original post years long ago. Holy Canoli

_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN

45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm


Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:23 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post Re:
movies35 wrote:
Kickass flick!

8/10 (B+)


How times change. This is one of my absolute favorite films now. One that grows with each viewing.

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:45 am
Profile YIM WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 24 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.