|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 11 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
Sex and the City 2
Sex and the City 2Quote: Sex and the City 2 is a 2010 American romantic comedy film directed by Michael Patrick King It is the sequel to the 2008 film Sex and the City, which is based on the HBO TV series of the same name.
The film was released in cinemas on May 27, 2010 in the United States and May 28, 2010 in the United Kingdom. The DVD was available for purchase in the United Kingdom on 29 November, 2010. The film stars Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Cattrall, Kristin Davis, Cynthia Nixon, and Chris Noth, who reprised their roles from the previous film and TV series. It also features cameos from Liza Minnelli, Miley Cyrus, Tim Gunn, Ron White, Omid Djalili and Penélope Cruz. As well as Broadway actors, Norm Lewis, Kelli O'Hara, and Ryan Silverman.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict.
|
Thu May 27, 2010 2:42 am |
|
|
movies35
Forum General
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm Posts: 8626 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
I thought it was a ton of fun, though quite underwhelming if compared to the television series or even the first movie. Still, it was an entertaining two and a half hours and it was nice to see the girls again. The condom bit with Samantha was hysterical and I, unlike many, loved Charlotte in this one. She had a much better storyline than in the first, which was pretty much non-existent. Also, the whole thing with Aidan was incredibly unnecessary and was aggravating. It should have been cut altogether.
7/10 ( B )
_________________ Top 10 Films of 2016
1. La La Land 2. Other People 3. Nocturnal Animals 4. Swiss Army Man 5. Manchester by the Sea 6. The Edge of Seventeen 7. Sing Street 8. Indignation 9. The Lobster 10. Hell or High Water
|
Sat May 29, 2010 12:58 pm |
|
|
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
They could have at least waited until Bea Arthur's body cooled before making a Golden Girls movie
_________________ k
|
Sat May 29, 2010 1:03 pm |
|
|
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
Lubitsch wrote: They could have at least waited until Bea Arthur's body cooled before making a Golden Girls movie Rue McClanahan was 51 when The Golden Girls was first broadcast. Kim Cattrall is 53.
|
Mon May 31, 2010 10:20 am |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
Sure the women are older, but they are still fabulous!
SEX & THE CITY 2 - 8/10 (B+)
Almost an A-. Not quite as good as the first, but very funny, touching, and just plain enjoyable. Terrific escapist entertainment. Fans of the first movie will enjoy it. Others will not be impressed, obviously.
I sure hope we see another someday.
|
Mon May 31, 2010 4:15 pm |
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
I saw the first twenty minutes and found the whole "gay wedding" shit rather offensive. I'm surprised you didn't Mike. They had similarly non PC things in the show, but they were much more clever and challenging, not just dull cliches displayed as truth. I still plan to see the rest of the movie, but was disappointed by the beginning.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:33 am |
|
|
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
Michael A wrote: I saw the first twenty minutes and found the whole "gay wedding" shit rather offensive. I'm surprised you didn't Mike. They had similarly non PC things in the show, but they were much more clever and challenging, not just dull cliches displayed as truth. I still plan to see the rest of the movie, but was disappointed by the beginning. What exactly does this fucking mean Savage??? So, did you go see this and then get up and leave in the beginning cause you were offended or what, but plan on seeing it again????
_________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:50 am |
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
I work at a theater. I watched the first 20 minutes during a break but haven't gone to watch the whole thing on my free time yet.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:36 am |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
Michael A wrote: I saw the first twenty minutes and found the whole "gay wedding" shit rather offensive. I'm surprised you didn't Mike. They had similarly non PC things in the show, but they were much more clever and challenging, not just dull cliches displayed as truth. I still plan to see the rest of the movie, but was disappointed by the beginning. I was only slightly offended. It's very stereotypical, but for the most part it's all in good fun and hard to take seriously. My only complaint is that Stanford's fiance (I forget the character's name - I've never liked him though - he's loud and annoying and makes gay people look bad, IMO) had to have the stipulation that he's allowed to cheat since Stanford got an extravagant wedding. Why was that necessary? Certainly doesn't make us gays look the best. I wasn't incredibly offended, I just found it a little unflattering.
|
Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:45 am |
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
Mike wrote: Michael A wrote: I saw the first twenty minutes and found the whole "gay wedding" shit rather offensive. I'm surprised you didn't Mike. They had similarly non PC things in the show, but they were much more clever and challenging, not just dull cliches displayed as truth. I still plan to see the rest of the movie, but was disappointed by the beginning. I was only slightly offended. It's very stereotypical, but for the most part it's all in good fun and hard to take seriously. My only complaint is that Stanford's fiance (I forget the character's name - I've never liked him though - he's loud and annoying and makes gay people look bad, IMO) had to have the stipulation that he's allowed to cheat since Stanford got an extravagant wedding. Why was that necessary? Certainly doesn't make us gays look the best. I wasn't incredibly offended, I just found it a little unflattering. The cheating stipulation was my primary complaint, but I was also irritated by every character using gay to refer to their stereotypical interpretations of such every 10 seconds. Omg this wedding is so gay there are swans! blah blah blah. Swans don't make someone homosexual, having sex with other members of the same sex does.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Sun Jun 06, 2010 12:13 am |
|
|
JURiNG
ef star star kay
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:45 pm Posts: 3016 Location: Cairo, Egypt
|
Re: Sex and the City 2
Is it strange to not feel offended even though I'm a Muslim?
B
_________________
|
Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:10 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 11 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 207 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|