Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:20 am



Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
 Irréversible [Irreversible] 

What grade would you give this film?
A 20%  20%  [ 1 ]
B 20%  20%  [ 1 ]
C 60%  60%  [ 3 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 5

 Irréversible [Irreversible] 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Irréversible [Irreversible]
Irréversible

Image

Quote:
Irréversible is a 2002 French film written, directed, photographed, and edited by Gaspar Noé. It stars Monica Bellucci and Vincent Cassel. Several reviewers declared it one of the most disturbing and controversial films of 2002. The film employs non-linear narrative. The music is by French electronic musician Thomas Bangalter, who is best known as half of the band Daft Punk.

Irréversible won the "Bronze Horse" award at the Stockholm Film Festival and competed for the Palme d'Or at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival, as well as the "Best Foreign Language Award" by the Film Critics Circle of Australia. It was also voted "Best Foreign Language Film" by the San Diego Film Critics Society (tied with Les Invasions Barbares).


Wed Aug 03, 2005 8:28 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
I think the film is really quite interesting. I hate how the movie is known for the two graphic scenes because the film is much more than that. Actually, the scenes of graphic violence (the first half of the movie) is really boring. I enjoy the last half more.

7/10 (B)

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:45 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Iron Man

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 9:15 pm
Posts: 622
Post 
I'll give it a C+! The movie had some great performances as well as a good theme. However, many of the graphic violent/sex scenes felt gratuitous and only there for the shock value. Furthermore, the camera work in the beginning of the movie, mostly, is very very annoying. I realize the director wanted us to feel disoriented but did he want us to get a headache as well? All in all, a flawed but satisfactory movie!


Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:21 pm
Profile
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35248
Location: Minnesota
Post 
Image

IRREVERSIBLE (2003)


I'm really not a fan of this whole "movie in reverse" thing to begin with. It seems like a cheap gimmick to try and trick people into thinking a movie is brilliant, and it usually works, because MEMENTO (6/10 or C+) and IRREVERSIBLE both got some great reviews. Hmm, I wonder if GIGLI was played backwards if it would have gotten better reviews? Probably not, but I swear you could put anything backwards and people would eat it up, finding it brilliant. However, IRREVERSIBLE takes the whole reverse thing to a new awfulness. The first half of this movie is one of the most annoying, boring, and just plain stupid things I've ever witnessed on screen. I was ready to call this one of the worst films of all time. I almost didn't want to finish it, but at the same time I wanted to just so I could say that I watched the whole thing and my opinion would be taken more seriously. So I sat disgusted, constantly rolling my eyes at what a hateful, moronic film this was. The lighting and shaky camera work couldn't have been worse. I don't know if I've ever seen such annoyingly awful camera work. It's supposed to be "cool" and help the feel of the movie, but I could have done without it. It made the movie much less watchable. I couldn't help but think about all of the people that probably rented it and shut it off during the first twenty minutes or so.

After having to sit through what is probably the worst lighting and camera work I've ever seen, and having to hear what is probably the most number of times I've heard the word "fag" in one movie, we're "treated" to a disturbing rape scene. Don't get me wrong, this scene is disgusting and awful to watch, yet at the same time, this scene is almost comforting, because the camera is finally still for the first time in the movie and you can actually tell what the hell is going on. This is a horrible scene to sit through, but after sitting through everything before this, it was a relief to be able to see what was going on for once, and this of all places, is actually where I started to get interested in the movie.

I couldn't have hated the first half of this film more. It was excruciating to sit through. I didn't know a movie could be this torturous. But then the second half comes along, and it's actually pretty good and interesting, at least compared to the first half of the movie (which is actually the last half, but the movie is backwards, so we see the last half first). It went from being one of the worst movies ever to one I actually got interested in, which was too bad, because I hate to not completely hate a movie with a first half as absolutely awful as the one here.

In my opinion, playing this movie in reverse only hurt it. The awful camera work and lighting we see in the first half is a big part of what makes the first half so horrible. But at the very least, it wouldn't have been so bad if it would have just started from the actual beginning and went to the end, instead of trying to be clever and go in reverse. If it just would have played from beginning to end, the awful first half wouldn't have seemed so bad. In fact, I even watched bits and pieces of the first half over again once the movie was over, and things made a little more sense this time around, and while it was still annoying, it wasn't quite as bad. But with it playing backwards, we start out not knowing or giving a crap about any of the characters, even kind of hating them. This serves no purpose except to annoy the viewer.

It's hard to find any of the performances of the main cast amazing, especially since we can't stand them for the first half of the movie, and it's only in the second half, which is the actual beginning, that we get to know the characters. Monica Bellucci was fine, but you kind of can't help but like her off the bat because you feel bad for her character having to get brutally raped. I couldn't stand Vincent Cassel during the first half, because his character, Marcus, annoyed the hell out of me. But then during the second half, even when he's being kind of a dick, I liked him at times. He even becomes pretty attractive during the second half. Sure, he acts like a jerk at times, but he did have his moments where he was kind of sweet. And towards the end (the beginning), it was nice to be able to have a good amount of time to admire his body. It was quite beautiful.

IRREVERSIBLE has me torn. Yes, part of it is unbelievably annoying and easy to hate, but the other half was actually interesting. I do think if I were to see it again I'd probably like it more, but I don't think I'll ever want to sit through this movie again. If I ever do it probably won't be as awful to sit through knowing exactly what is going on during the first half. On a whole though, this is an obvious exploitation film. And part of me can't help but think of it as a movie version of Prodigy's "Smack My Bitch Up" music video, except MUCH more brutal and not nearly as cool. The very ending also goes back to annoying again, with an absolutely blinding flashing (which can be compared to a strobe light). This just wasn't necessary, and it hurt my eyes. But I'm just lucky I wasn't one of the unfortunates that had to witness this on a big screen. Now THAT would have been hell.

First half (the end): 1/10 (F)
Second half (the beginning): 7/10 (B-)

Overall rating: 5/10 (C-)


Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:09 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Irréversible
Better in concept than execution; the talky third act is nearly as unwatchable as the rape scene. Only the opening really delivers on the film's promise.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:00 am
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68365
Post 
Irréversible

Absolutely engrossing, powerful cinema. The cinematography is sublime, how it mimics the rage of the attitudes and the tempo of the situation; a bewildered, swirling, inebriated feeling of unease. It is risky, and it did bug me, but afterwards I immediately appreciated it. And the editing is on-point too, as it slowly reveals more and more, albeit moving back in time, which makes the revenge scene all the more gratifying. I sat at the end of the film and pondered it all, amazed at what I'd just seen (and that hasn't happened in a long time), not because of the infamous rape scene (which wasn't all that shocking to me) but because of everything else - my jaw hit the floor at the fire extinguisher scene. The realism hits you immediately, and from then on you're in their world. This is true cinema.

A

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:23 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.