Author |
Message |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
 Re: Funny People
Magnus wrote: I don't think it had pacing issues in the sense that it spent way way too much of time on every single section. It's not like it rushed some sections or dragged other sections longer than others. Everything was dragged out equally, so in that sense, it didn't have pacing issues. Deliberately too. I'm glad he spent a lot of time telling his story. I actually think the first act and the last act seemed to be a little rushed. Not enough to where I thought it hurt the film significantly, but I remember thinking a couple of times (especially during the first act) where it seemed like some stuff was skipped over. It seemed like Apatow was deliberately making a long movie and then someone at the studio reminded him that it needed to be cut down in order to get in more showtimes. I think if Apatow had/has a dream cut it's at least 165-180 minutes long.
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:18 am |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11617 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Funny People
Had this movie been 30 minutes shorter, it would have been one of the best dramedies ever made, but because it wasn't, it dragged it self to the most disapointing one. Still Adam Sandler gives one of the most unexpectedly brilliant performances ever in a movie, key word, unexpectedly. Seriously I hope he gets a goddamn Oscar nomination, the guy needs some serious props for that role.
_________________
|
Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:53 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Funny People
I like the following review of Funny People from Rob Gonsalves of eFilmCritic.com - - I think it captures some of what I thought made this film great: Quote: Funny People
by Rob Gonsalves
"Sad clown." 5 stars
The part of "Funny People" that a lot of people have problems with is the part I liked the most — the final third (or, really, the final quarter).
George Simmons (Adam Sandler), a world-famous comedian who’s been having serious health issues, goes to Marin County to visit his one-time girlfriend Laura (Leslie Mann), now married with kids. For George, she’s the one who got away; he beats himself up endlessly for not having been worthy of her (he cheated on her). Writer-director Judd Apatow (Knocked Up) settles in: the Marin County section takes far longer than we expect it to, and the longer it goes on, the more we suspect that George still isn’t worthy of her. He may have aged, he may have battled disease, but he hasn’t actually changed much.
In most movies about illness, the lead character matures and learns something about himself amid a drizzle of inspirational schmaltz. Apatow doesn’t play that game. George isn’t a bastard on the outside and a teddy bear on the inside — he’s pretty much a bastard through and through. He takes a wannabe stand-up comic, Ira Wright (Seth Rogen), under his wing, first as a joke writer and then as an all-purpose caretaker (he makes Ira sit at his bedside until he falls asleep). Yet George treats Ira cavalierly, inconsistently. One minute Ira is a buddy; the next he’s just an employee. Ira, who gets on stage and dies until he falls back on dick jokes, is just one of many hopefuls yearning to make it in L.A. He’s basically in the same boat as his roomies, fellow (and funnier) aspiring stand-up Leo (Jonah Hill) and actor Mark (Jason Schwartzman), who actually has made it — he’s starring in a lame sitcom called Yo, Teach! Yet even Mark’s fame may be fleeting — when was the last time you saw Mark Curry, star of the similar Hangin’ with Mr. Cooper?
I’ve run hot and cold on Apatow: I enjoyed his directorial debut The 40-Year-Old Virgin and had problems with Knocked Up. But Funny People is easily his most ambitious and fully felt effort. Apatow not only worships comedians but knows them inside out, yet the film isn’t a make-’em-laugh-while-you’re-crying-inside melodrama like Punchline; it’s closer to The King of Comedy or the 1949 Milton Berle vehicle Always Leave Them Laughing. In those films, the comedians were hard and cold, which a comedian has to be on some level if he or she is to succeed. (We suspect that cuddly, sensitive Ira is doomed to work at Otto’s Deli.) The conversations have the easy flow of improv yet usually lead in angry directions. Funny People could have used the tagline for Clerks with a modification: “Just because they make you laugh doesn’t mean they like you.”
The movie made me laugh a few times — the scene between a certain rapper and a certain sitcom star will become legendary — but Funny People is generally more of a drama with comedic elements. At times it mines the ironic comedy of a bunch of wannabes who want what a big star has, while the star himself would trade it all for the vulgar camaraderie they have (to Apatow’s credit, he never has George come out and say this). Towards the end, though, the film gets messier and deeper. George reconnects with Laura, whose amiable husband (Eric Bana) is never around. The two former lovers re-establish their old rhythms and attraction. A reunion is what they think they want. But George hasn’t changed; Laura has. What the movie ends up saying is that some funny people will always be alone; their artistic strengths and their personal flaws are two sides of the same coin.
It’s about as complex as an American mainstream movie is likely to get these days, and the fact that Judd Apatow delivered it, with a bitter and revealing performance by Adam Sandler that far outpaces everything else he’s done, is certainly a surprise.
|
Thu Aug 06, 2009 9:36 am |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Funny People
This is proof that Judd Apatow isn't ever going to make movies that I don't like. There are so many things wrong withFunny People, and it's certainly not as successful as his first two efforts, yet I kinda loved it. I loved how it was a big-budget comedy that dealt with way deeper themes and characters than any other big-budget comedies out there, I loved the shaky balance between comedy and drama, I loved the somewhat excessive length, I loved the entire cast (though this solidified my belief that Seth Rogen will never be able to star in a non-comedy), I loved the movie/celebrity references (honestly, it seems like such an easy thing to do well, yet so few movies do them this well), I loved how Apatow didn't go for the happily-ever-after ending that marked his prior efforts, and I loved how Adam Sandler was finally in a mainstream and not-retarded movie, even if this one's box office was closer to Punch Drunk Love / Reign Over Me than to Zohan / Chuck & Larry. And from the sound of it, most people really didn't like this movie, because it pushed them and made them feel uncomfortable when they were expecting another happy little raunch-fest. I think when Apatow made the film, he sort of knew that was going to happen, and I really respect him for going through with it anyways. Because this is a splendid semi-mess of a film.
A-
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:57 am |
|
 |
paper
Artie the One-Man Party
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm Posts: 4632
|
 Re: Funny People
I like it a lot more as time passes, despite its obvious flaws.
A-
|
Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:17 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Funny People
I thought it was pretty terrific, myself.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:07 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: Funny People
is makeshift's cock salty or sweet?
_________________ k
|
Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:17 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Funny People
sweeter than snack's, that's for sure
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:12 pm |
|
 |
jmovies
Let's Call It A Bromance
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm Posts: 12333
|
 Re: Funny People
After reading average reviews of Apatow's third film behind the director chair, my expectations went down a bit but boy did this film blow those out of the park. Adam Sandler pulls in one of his best performances by far in this very funny comedy that mizes just the right amount of drama at the same time. Seth Rogen and Leslie Mann were also great. It is a wonderful revelation in getting a second chance at life and trying to work out all the worngs from before. The 146-minute runtime is no problem at all and just makes the film more rich as we get to spend more time with these characters. It is definitely the best of Apatow's directorial outings and the right step for Sandler's career. It's a shame this is being passed up by audiences. A
|
Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:46 pm |
|
 |
Riggs
We had our time together
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am Posts: 13299 Location: Vienna
|
 Re: Funny People
Best movie of the year so far and THANK GOD it wasn't shorter, could have been longer though. I loved it. A
|
Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:44 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40573
|
 Re: Funny People
I quite loved it. Apatow is the king of human exploration and this and George goes deeper than any of his other films. Sandler is pretty revelatory... its the first time hes really felt like old. This is also Rogans best work to date I think
Theres also an interesting avenue it takes... Comedians by nature work to expose reality and how things really are, Funny People does the same. The goofy laughable on-screen George is really a cold, selfish prick off it. Ira isnt ready for how the cutthroat comedy world or girls like Daisy really are, but he continues to live in that illusion. Laura and Clarke both had dreams of stardom in acting and soccer that were never realized. The Laura-George relationship originally appears to be headed in the way we and George want it to, but the reality of her and her family ends up pushing it off the rails. Every time a comedian leaves the stage, they remark about how much they killed it and are headed for big things; The underlying message is clear... the people who work most to dissect or recreate reality, namely actors and comedians, are the ones most disillusioned by it.
The length didnt bother me at all... I couldve been in this world for 3 hours and not minded. Apatow is definitely one of my favorite filmmakers... I dont know if it this is better than the 40YOV or Knocked Up, its just... different. I think its a pretty big departure from those films which were made for laughs. This wasnt.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:09 am |
|
 |
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
 Re: Funny People
each time I think about the first 2/3s of this film I get a smile thinking about how good of an auteur Apatow was and how impressive the film was. Each time I think about the final third I want to punch a young panda cub right in the face.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:07 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: Funny People
It is a terrible, terrible myth that the third act is that much worse than what came before. The whole movie sucks pretty much equally.
_________________ k
|
Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:18 pm |
|
 |
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
 Re: Funny People
yoshue, I love you, I do, but you hate 500 dos. Your opinion in film is dead to me.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:26 am |
|
 |
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 35248 Location: Minnesota
|
 Re: Funny People
I've watched an hour and 10 minutes and am shutting it off. I cannot bear to sit through another hour and 20 minutes. It sucks, and Adam Sandler and his character are so obnoxious. Seth Rogen is good, but I just don't care enough to keep watching. THUMBS DOWN!
|
Tue Nov 24, 2009 12:55 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
 Re: Funny People
Mike wrote: I've watched an hour and 10 minutes and am shutting it off. I cannot bear to sit through another hour and 20 minutes. It sucks, and Adam Sandler and his character are so obnoxious. Seth Rogen is good, but I just don't care enough to keep watching. THUMBS DOWN! Yeah, it was unbelievably atrocious. The characters are all deplorable douchebags.
|
Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:14 am |
|
 |
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
 Re: Funny People
Still one of the best films of the year, in my opinion. I saw it a couple times in theatres and want to buy the Blu-ray soon. I had no problem with the length, thought the characters were fascinating, and found every scene either moving or hilarious, often both. Adam Sandler is Oscar-worthy here. It's a pity this will go down as Judd's first post-"Virgin" fumble. It's an ambitious, well-mounted project and I am angry with audiences for not embracing it.
A
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Thu Nov 26, 2009 6:53 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11617 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Funny People
I don't think it will be considered a fumble in the long run, but I certainly doubt it will obtain any popularity like his other films, perhaps being a fumble might not be a bad thing for it, at least it will be remembered that way.
_________________
|
Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:31 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Funny People
It did drag towards the end... but I enjoyed it throughout. Not laugh out loud funny, but had it's moments.
***/**** B
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:16 pm |
|
 |
BK
Forum General
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am Posts: 7041
|
 Re: Funny People
billybobwashere wrote: This is proof that Judd Apatow isn't ever going to make movies that I don't like. There are so many things wrong withFunny People, and it's certainly not as successful as his first two efforts, yet I kinda loved it. I loved how it was a big-budget comedy that dealt with way deeper themes and characters than any other big-budget comedies out there, I loved the shaky balance between comedy and drama, I loved the somewhat excessive length, I loved the entire cast (though this solidified my belief that Seth Rogen will never be able to star in a non-comedy), I loved the movie/celebrity references (honestly, it seems like such an easy thing to do well, yet so few movies do them this well), I loved how Apatow didn't go for the happily-ever-after ending that marked his prior efforts, and I loved how Adam Sandler was finally in a mainstream and not-retarded movie, even if this one's box office was closer to Punch Drunk Love / Reign Over Me than to Zohan / Chuck & Larry. And from the sound of it, most people really didn't like this movie, because it pushed them and made them feel uncomfortable when they were expecting another happy little raunch-fest. I think when Apatow made the film, he sort of knew that was going to happen, and I really respect him for going through with it anyways. Because this is a splendid semi-mess of a film.
A- It had it's moments but nowhere did it really push anyone, or me, really, and honestly, that's kind of surprising because the first half and hour felt like two hours and the entire movie felt like four or five hours. The concepts and ideas are there but it's haphazardly stuck on together and meddles around too much without developing anything real solid. The real credit here goes to Apatow for daring to make such a movie but the writing was a little weak or maybe it was the direction, not knowing what it really wanted to be. Adam Sandler is better than most of his performances but there is far too much credit given, just look at the scene in which he shouts at Rogen at the family house. That just shows how uncomfortable he is doing what he isn't used to. Also, what non-happy ending do you speak of? It would be better if it ended with him just back doing his own selfish thing because nowhere does it show he's learned anything from his experience. Rogen however finally shows he is capable of acting a solid follow up to Observe and Report & Pineapple Express after ho-hum roles in his first features. The ideas explored with struggle in show-biz, unrealized dreams, bittersweet happiness, parenthood etc. are all interesting but as I previously mentioned are dwelled upon little for it's overlong running time. Michael A wrote: yoshue, I love you, I do, but you hate 500 dos. Your opinion in film is dead to me. So, all in all, a solid B from me, for what was a strong concept that didn't fulfill it's potential. An amazing film was in here somewhere, too bad it just wasn't the final cut.
_________________ Calls Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2 Lorax over Despicable Me Men in Black 3 Under 100m Madagascar 3 Under 100m Rise of the Guardians over 250m
|
Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:20 am |
|
 |
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
 Re: Funny People
Harry Warden wrote: Mike wrote: I've watched an hour and 10 minutes and am shutting it off. I cannot bear to sit through another hour and 20 minutes. It sucks, and Adam Sandler and his character are so obnoxious. Seth Rogen is good, but I just don't care enough to keep watching. THUMBS DOWN! Yeah, it was unbelievably atrocious. The characters are all deplorable douchebags. But those people in friday the 13th are just lovely.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:48 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: Funny People
still hate it
(i didn't watch it again or anything but i definitely still hate it)
_________________ k
|
Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:41 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 58 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|