Author |
Message |
Bell
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:02 am Posts: 1906 Location: Middle Of Nowhere
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
The Incredible Hulk is one of the best and entertaining movie in 2008. after you watched this new version, it's like you forgot that you ever saw Ang Lee's version. Edward Norton still as good as he used to be in any other movie he had in it. he provided a very good performance as Bruce Banner. The story itself is simple and fast-paced, far more better than previous Hulk (2003), which is more complex. Director Louis Leterrier succesfully bring this movie live up to fans expectation, i hope Louis still return to direct the sequel. since the movie only focus on Bruce Banner character, i think Tim Roth, Liv Tyler and William Hurt have their character portion more than enough. The SFX were GREAT!! especially on the climax duel between Hulk and The Abomination, incredibly stunning, maybe it could win the "Best Duel" category in the next MTV Movie awards.  overall the incredible hulk receives a solid A grade. i can't wait to see the sequel in years to come.
|
Sun Jul 27, 2008 6:26 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
It's enjoyable enough, I suppose, and the story progresses well, but there's not a lot to it. Ang Lee's version may have been flawed and difficult, but at least it was trying something ambitious. This one doesn't try anything new, and as a result it becomes fairly boring towards the end. Norton is good, and it shows promise near the beginning, but it soon devolves into mindless action without any real purpose. Shame.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:17 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40592
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
For a movie that's supposed to be the super fun, hulk smash action version of the character, it's remarkably boring and lifeless.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:27 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
Shack wrote: For a movie that's supposed to be the super fun, hulk smash action version of the character, it's remarkably boring and lifeless. 
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:46 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
Shack wrote: For a movie that's supposed to be the super fun, hulk smash action version of the character, it's remarkably boring and lifeless. We can debate this now til the sun goes down, but at the end of the day, the new movie got more right with the comic and TV Show than Ang Lee's movie did and the only reason some defend Lee's movie is because it's Ang Lee who's an Oscar winning director and in their eyes, he can do no wrong.. Simply put: Lee was the wrong director for a movie about the HULK.. Have a nice day..
|
Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:12 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
This was on par with Iron Man and even better than the Dark Knight, which I also loved! Great year for superhero movies, which Spider-Man 3, FF 2, Superman Returns, and X-Men 3 had all but crippled creatively.
Can't wait to see a Hulk/Thor throw down in the Avengers movie. (which they may want to rename "The Mighty Avengers" or something to avaoid confusing the dummies of the world who might think it's a reissue of the awful Avengers movie with Sean Connery and Uma Thurman. )
BKB, you know it and I know it. (as well as general movie going public) The Incredible Hulk was excellent, and Marvel studios is off to a smashing start!
|
Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:54 pm |
|
 |
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm Posts: 4110 Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
MR. GREEN wrote: Simply put: Lee was the wrong director for a movie about the HULK[/b] And yet his movie was superior to this one, and the new direction resulted in a nearly identical box office gross.
_________________ This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:43 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
Webslinger wrote: MR. GREEN wrote: Simply put: Lee was the wrong director for a movie about the HULK[/b] And yet his movie was superior to this one, and the new direction resulted in a nearly identical box office gross. You have 1 shot to make an impression.. Once that fails, rarely do moviegoers or the public give 2nd chances at restarts.. Box office wise TIH did make about 4 Million more than Lee's, but in the end, it was the fanbase than the casual moviegoer that turned out for this, even out of sheer curiousity to see if it were better or not and it was ALOT better.. Anyone who's familiar with the HULK in the comics knows TIH got more right than Ang Lee's version did..
|
Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:39 am |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
I like Ang Lee's Hulk even though it's super-flawed, but I really enjoyed his interpretation. TIH is not a bad movie, it's just not particularly impactful or memorable. The SFX are okay (suprisingly the Hulk and Abomination are better than the badly done heliocopter at the end).
Overall there's just no meat to it or nothing to hang on to. Northon is passable, but really William Hurt does the best in this.
Being that it starts in South America, and there's very little overlap, there's very little stopping this from almost being a direct sequel to Hulk other than Norton repeats some of the same conversations.
I missed the part where Banner is "cured" and then jumps out of the copter knowing he'll Hulk out. Isn't he supposedly cured? I don't understand why he's confident.
It's not bad however.
|
Tue Nov 04, 2008 12:37 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
MR. GREEN wrote: Webslinger wrote: MR. GREEN wrote: Simply put: Lee was the wrong director for a movie about the HULK[/b] And yet his movie was superior to this one, and the new direction resulted in a nearly identical box office gross. You have 1 shot to make an impression.. Once that fails, rarely do moviegoers or the public give 2nd chances at restarts.. Box office wise TIH did make about 4 Million more than Lee's, but in the end, it was the fanbase than the casual moviegoer that turned out for this, even out of sheer curiousity to see if it were better or not and it was ALOT better.. Anyone who's familiar with the HULK in the comics knows TIH got more right than Ang Lee's version did..It was definitely very well received. I'd say it was about as good of a combination of the comic and TV show as possible, and that's why it pleased moviegoers, comic fans, and fans of the show. DVD audiences are in for a nice surprise with Incredible Hulk, and I'd say that with the Hulk being in the Avengers (which should challenge Titanic's box office!), the Hulk's next film, through the goodwill earned by Incredible Hulk and (hopefully) Avengers, could be poised to finally do your 400 million domestic take, BKB! 
|
Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:07 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
Maverikk wrote: MR. GREEN wrote: Webslinger wrote: MR. GREEN wrote: Simply put: Lee was the wrong director for a movie about the HULK[/b] And yet his movie was superior to this one, and the new direction resulted in a nearly identical box office gross. You have 1 shot to make an impression.. Once that fails, rarely do moviegoers or the public give 2nd chances at restarts.. Box office wise TIH did make about 4 Million more than Lee's, but in the end, it was the fanbase than the casual moviegoer that turned out for this, even out of sheer curiousity to see if it were better or not and it was ALOT better.. Anyone who's familiar with the HULK in the comics knows TIH got more right than Ang Lee's version did..It was definitely very well received. I'd say it was about as good of a combination of the comic and TV show as possible, and that's why it pleased moviegoers, comic fans, and fans of the show. DVD audiences are in for a nice surprise with Incredible Hulk, and I'd say that with the Hulk being in the Avengers (which should challenge Titanic's box office!), the Hulk's next film, through the goodwill earned by Incredible Hulk and (hopefully) Avengers, could be poised to finally do your 400 million domestic take, BKB!  I don't know about challenging TITANIC.. TDK damn near did it cause of Heath Ledger and his death that had to live up to the movie and people turned out in droves because of it whther they want to admit it or not which really was the reason why it made what it did.. Unless a well known cast member of the AVENGERS overdoses during Production sparking huge interest, I see it making 1/2 of that.. I'm just too cautious now when it comes to box office predicting for stuff like this cause I usually get burned..
|
Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:49 am |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
what a boring movie. c-
|
Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:15 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
BJ wrote: I liked Hulk 03 more. Word. Ang Lee's Hulk is hampered by a pretty goofy final 20 minutes. (Everything after the action scene in San Fran.) Otherwise, it was stylish, had some great acting and plenty of soul. This film just felt much less ambitious, and no, not in a good way. Only Tim Roth excels, perhaps because everyone else had stronger performances of the same characters in '03. I can only imagine how cool this might have been if we lived in an alternative universe where Ang Lee's Hulk got the praise it deserved, and now the effects had been improved and the story was more dynamic. This version just felt like a lot of slick chase scenes with very little of any interest to connect the dots.
|
Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:22 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
MovieDude wrote: BJ wrote: I liked Hulk 03 more. Word. Ang Lee's Hulk is hampered by a pretty goofy final 20 minutes. (Everything after the action scene in San Fran.) Otherwise, it was stylish, had some great acting and plenty of soul. This film just felt much less ambitious, and no, not in a good way. Only Tim Roth excels, perhaps because everyone else had stronger performances of the same characters in '03. I can only imagine how cool this might have been if we lived in an alternative universe where Ang Lee's Hulk got the praise it deserved, and now the effects had been improved and the story was more dynamic. This version just felt like a lot of slick chase scenes with very little of any interest to connect the dots. What?? You've gotta be kidding me?? Take the day time shots of Roth walking up to the HULK.. That was a bold move to do in such a cynical age where everyone demands FX be perfect and I'll tell ya: Anyone who says that part didn't look as real as it can get has their collective heads up Ang Lee's ass and refuse to admit Ang Lee simply missed on his version.. His version had the HULK look like a fucking mongoloid baby every time he was angry and threw a fit, like a child boyish look to his face that was NOT reminiscent of how the comic look.. In the new version, they made the HULK look scary as fuck that would make you crap your pants, ESPECIALLY in the bottling plant when Roth took aim at him and got his first look face to face with him.. This HULK looked Fierce the way she should look.. This HULK blended the ULTIMATES from Marvel the way it should've been.. However, there's no point in beating a deadhorse trying to convnce KJ users of this cause you had your minds made up you weren't going to like it from the moment you saw the movie cause in many of minds around here, Ang Lee can do no wrong no matter how bad the movie sucked.. WORD
|
Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:02 am |
|
 |
Argos
Z
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm Posts: 7952 Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
4/10.
|
Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:10 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
MR. GREEN wrote: MovieDude wrote: BJ wrote: I liked Hulk 03 more. Word. Ang Lee's Hulk is hampered by a pretty goofy final 20 minutes. (Everything after the action scene in San Fran.) Otherwise, it was stylish, had some great acting and plenty of soul. This film just felt much less ambitious, and no, not in a good way. Only Tim Roth excels, perhaps because everyone else had stronger performances of the same characters in '03. I can only imagine how cool this might have been if we lived in an alternative universe where Ang Lee's Hulk got the praise it deserved, and now the effects had been improved and the story was more dynamic. This version just felt like a lot of slick chase scenes with very little of any interest to connect the dots. What?? You've gotta be kidding me?? Take the day time shots of Roth walking up to the HULK.. That was a bold move to do in such a cynical age where everyone demands FX be perfect and I'll tell ya: Anyone who says that part didn't look as real as it can get has their collective heads up Ang Lee's ass and refuse to admit Ang Lee simply missed on his version.. His version had the HULK look like a fucking mongoloid baby every time he was angry and threw a fit, like a child boyish look to his face that was NOT reminiscent of how the comic look.. In the new version, they made the HULK look scary as fuck that would make you crap your pants, ESPECIALLY in the bottling plant when Roth took aim at him and got his first look face to face with him.. This HULK looked Fierce the way she should look.. This HULK blended the ULTIMATES from Marvel the way it should've been.. However, there's no point in beating a deadhorse trying to convnce KJ users of this cause you had your minds made up you weren't going to like it from the moment you saw the movie cause in many of minds around here, Ang Lee can do no wrong no matter how bad the movie sucked.. WORDThere was a day, B. Once upon a time, you would have kissed the ground Ang Lee walked on. Back then, Ang Lee's Hulk was the pinnacle of visual effects marvels, revolutionary work, and you were shocked that so few others understood. Oh, how the times have changed. You betrayed Ang Lee, and the film that should have beat Spider-Man. And just as you abandonded your idol, I don't doubt that you will turn your back on this Hulk as well, once the news breaks that a third interpretation of the Hulk is being made into a movie. Once again, you will champion Hulk as the biggest film of the year, the one that will finally get it right. Everyone else may chide the trailers for their cartoonish visuals, but you will stand behind this new Hulk until the bitter end, shaking your head in disgust at the masses who don't comprehend Rob Cohen's true understanding of the big greeen guy. Face it man, this might just be one comic book character that was never meant to be.
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:41 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
Heh. Nice deconstruction, Dude! (Is BKB going to stay 15 forever?!?  )
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:52 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
MovieDude wrote: MR. GREEN wrote: MovieDude wrote: BJ wrote: I liked Hulk 03 more. Word. Ang Lee's Hulk is hampered by a pretty goofy final 20 minutes. (Everything after the action scene in San Fran.) Otherwise, it was stylish, had some great acting and plenty of soul. This film just felt much less ambitious, and no, not in a good way. Only Tim Roth excels, perhaps because everyone else had stronger performances of the same characters in '03. I can only imagine how cool this might have been if we lived in an alternative universe where Ang Lee's Hulk got the praise it deserved, and now the effects had been improved and the story was more dynamic. This version just felt like a lot of slick chase scenes with very little of any interest to connect the dots. What?? You've gotta be kidding me?? Take the day time shots of Roth walking up to the HULK.. That was a bold move to do in such a cynical age where everyone demands FX be perfect and I'll tell ya: Anyone who says that part didn't look as real as it can get has their collective heads up Ang Lee's ass and refuse to admit Ang Lee simply missed on his version.. His version had the HULK look like a fucking mongoloid baby every time he was angry and threw a fit, like a child boyish look to his face that was NOT reminiscent of how the comic look.. In the new version, they made the HULK look scary as fuck that would make you crap your pants, ESPECIALLY in the bottling plant when Roth took aim at him and got his first look face to face with him.. This HULK looked Fierce the way she should look.. This HULK blended the ULTIMATES from Marvel the way it should've been.. However, there's no point in beating a deadhorse trying to convnce KJ users of this cause you had your minds made up you weren't going to like it from the moment you saw the movie cause in many of minds around here, Ang Lee can do no wrong no matter how bad the movie sucked.. WORDThere was a day, B. Once upon a time, you would have kissed the ground Ang Lee walked on. Back then, Ang Lee's Hulk was the pinnacle of visual effects marvels, revolutionary work, and you were shocked that so few others understood. Oh, how the times have changed. You betrayed Ang Lee, and the film that should have beat Spider-Man. And just as you abandonded your idol, I don't doubt that you will turn your back on this Hulk as well, once the news breaks that a third interpretation of the Hulk is being made into a movie. Once again, you will champion Hulk as the biggest film of the year, the one that will finally get it right. Everyone else may chide the trailers for their cartoonish visuals, but you will stand behind this new Hulk until the bitter end, shaking your head in disgust at the masses who don't comprehend Rob Cohen's true understanding of the big greeen guy. Face it man, this might just be one comic book character that was never meant to be. Back then, YES, I probably did worship the ground the guy walked on over this, but times have changed and someone else came up with a far better intepretation than his and looking back on it, Ang Lee got more wrong than right.. He was never a fan of the character, never a fan of the comic and the only reason he even made the movie was because it was a challenge.. If someone else comes along 2 or 3 years down the road and makes an even better one than Edward Norton made, but I really doubt it.. Again, open your eyes, watch the movie again and pay attention to the FX and realize it just doesn't get any better than that and you folks know it..
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:10 am |
|
 |
MGKC
---------
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm Posts: 11808 Location: Kansas City, Kansas
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
New posts!
|
Sun May 02, 2010 1:21 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
MG Casey wrote: New posts! After seeing IRONMAN 2, this makes TIH even better..
_________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
Sun May 02, 2010 4:23 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
How did you see Iron Man 2, BKB?
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun May 02, 2010 5:15 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
BKB is actually from Hong Kong, you didn't know?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun May 02, 2010 5:28 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
I wasn't aware BKB knew there was a world outside America.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun May 02, 2010 5:30 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
This movie really was well done. I find it hysterical how people on the internet were confused and thinking they were still supposed to be hating and mocking it because of the Ang Lee movie, and then when the smoke cleared, the consensus realized it was actually damn good! I would rate this every bit as good as Iron Man was.
|
Sun May 02, 2010 6:45 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: The Incredible Hulk
trixster wrote: How did you see Iron Man 2, BKB? The local radio station gave away free passes to see it and they went quick.. I think after seeing it, I can only conclude that really, if you liked IRONMAN, there's just no reason why you shouldn't like the sequel and after seeing it, I revisited the nitpick complaints on the reviews online and I just have to disagree with a majority of them and find them to be nothing more than just that: Nitpicks.. The 2nd act of the movie was designed to be slow and take it's time telling a story while the ADD crowd apparently insists on nonstop action.. The parts dealing with Starks illness were nothing short of superb, but didn't totally tread in the "Demon in the Bottle" storyline cause that just too depressing of material to show in movie designed to be for all ages.. Not everything has to be so damn "Dark and Depressing" like today's youth, today's generation thrives on.. Hell, imagine if there were even a shred of light in TDK?? Batman nerds would've went fucking crazy over that and lynched Nolan, but Favereau keeps it lighthearted with great chemistry from everyone involved.. I really wish deep down that this guy was the one Directing The AVENGERS.. I just don't have enough info on this guy Josh Whedon to decide if he's really the one to assemble the AVENGERS, but I guess it doesn't matter what I think since it's a done deal.. I gave IRONMAN 2 an "A" by the way and even though that was sort of expected since I'm very biased toward MARVEL, the movie really is a superior sequel, the way sequels are meant to be: Bigger is Better..
_________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
Sun May 02, 2010 11:51 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|