|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
 Paycheck Paycheck Quote: Paycheck is a 2003 film adaptation of the short story of the same name by science fiction writer Philip K. Dick. The film was directed by John Woo and stars Ben Affleck, Uma Thurman and Aaron Eckhart. Paul Giamatti and Colm Feore also appear.
Paycheck is Woo's last American film to date. I'm a fan. Fast, entertaining thriller. B+
|
| Wed May 24, 2006 7:35 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Silly, but ultimately quite fun.
B+
Edit: I just realized I was thinking of the Mel Gibson movie Payback. Which my above description relates to.
Paycheck...not so much. Um, D+, maybe?
|
| Wed May 24, 2006 7:37 pm |
|
|
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
Paycheck, B+, one of the best constructed thrillers of the 00's. Not a great movie, not a deep movie, but a clever entertainment that delivers what it promises to. It got swept away in the Ben Affleck backlash, and not judged on its own merits.
|
| Wed May 24, 2006 7:43 pm |
|
|
|
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
|
I agree with Archie that this got caught in the anti affleck thing which is a pity cause this was an enjoyable movie if a bit proposterous in parts
B-
_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
| Wed May 24, 2006 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
|
A fairly intriguing concept, and an interesting beginning, are ultimately ruined by mindless action scenes and horrible dialogue. The plot goes awry about halfway through this, so all that's left is action, which is admittedly good, yet serves no purpose. And the acting is bad. Bad, bad, bad. Affleck actually looks decent in this compared to the one-dimensionalness of Eckhart and the woodenness of Thurman. And Giamatti is wasted. Altogether an entertaining, stupid film.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
| Wed May 24, 2006 7:55 pm |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
