Author |
Message |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Friday Numbers (05/29)
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sat May 30, 2015 12:52 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22181 Location: Places
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Knew SA was topping that 16m estimate after it's midnights.
It won't get 50 million with that #, I think. But high 40s isn't bad.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 12:56 pm |
|
 |
Flava'd vs The World
The Kramer
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:36 am Posts: 25163 Location: Classified
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
I should have never doubted The Rock. Male starpower isn't dead after all ... until you look down and see how far Coops has fallen since January. Screw everyone who isn't seeing Tomorrowland. 
|
Sat May 30, 2015 1:21 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68214 Location: Seattle, WA
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
I expect it is refreshing for people to get a "blockbuster" that isn't a sequel, a reboot, a remake, or based on a comic-book. San Andreas will let the youth of today know what a 90s summer blockbuster was like.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat May 30, 2015 1:24 pm |
|
 |
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Do people still believe Tomorrowland will squeak by 100 million?
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Sat May 30, 2015 1:31 pm |
|
 |
Dil
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:48 pm Posts: 8942 Location: Houston, Texas
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Great OD for SA and it should go well over $100M. I actually think it will end up around Taken 2's gross or slightly more eventhough JW is going to hurt it. Not much else to say about the rest except that it's nice to see that MM might have the best drop out the bunch.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 1:32 pm |
|
 |
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36945
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Tomorrowland is not going to make $100m and it is bombing in OS markets as well.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 1:47 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
As I asked before: were Dennis Quaid and John Cusack considrered big draws after The Day After Tomorrow and 2012?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:09 pm |
|
 |
Flava'd vs The World
The Kramer
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:36 am Posts: 25163 Location: Classified
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Both of those movies had brands though. Everyone knew about the Mayan prophecy and everyone knew about global warming. This was just The Rock and some jabroni earthquakes.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:12 pm |
|
 |
Flava'd vs The World
The Kramer
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:36 am Posts: 25163 Location: Classified
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Why can't Fury Road put up a decent friday increase? Most deceiving daily numbers ever. $150M is probably out now.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:13 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22181 Location: Places
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Dr. Lecter wrote: As I asked before: were Dennis Quaid and John Cusack considrered big draws after The Day After Tomorrow and 2012? No but at the point in time the genre was the star. The straight up disaster concept isn't that big of a sell any more.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:19 pm |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12193
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
These numbers are very encouraging for ID4 imo. Even without Smith, 90's nostalgia is a powerful thing. I expect the budget, effects, teasers/trailers, to be much stronger for that one as well as release date. There's still demand for popcorn blockbusters.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:20 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22181 Location: Places
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Yes but today people eithe rlike ultra serious Nolany films or self aware tongue in cheek wink wink borderline parodies ala Transformers or Avengers or what have.
You the mix, which was heavily featured in the 90s and early 2000s, doesnt work any more.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:23 pm |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12193
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Excel wrote: Yes but today people eithe rlike ultra serious Nolany films or self aware tongue in cheek wink wink borderline parodies ala Transformers or Avengers or what have.
You the mix, which was heavily featured in the 90s and early 2000s, doesnt work any more. This makes no sense? What are you talking about?  I feel like people are over the Transformers type movie.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:27 pm |
|
 |
Skyblade
Wall-E
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:07 am Posts: 879
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Dr. Lecter wrote: As I asked before: were Dennis Quaid and John Cusack considrered big draws after The Day After Tomorrow and 2012? I think Jake Gyllenhaal walked off with DAM clout, rightfully or not.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 2:31 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22181 Location: Places
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
O wrote: Excel wrote: Yes but today people eithe rlike ultra serious Nolany films or self aware tongue in cheek wink wink borderline parodies ala Transformers or Avengers or what have.
You the mix, which was heavily featured in the 90s and early 2000s, doesnt work any more. This makes no sense? What are you talking about?  I feel like people are over the Transformers type movie. They are, but they're not over that silly/stupid humor style. Or maybe they are, as Avengers can attest to.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 5:49 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68214 Location: Seattle, WA
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Dr. Lecter wrote: As I asked before: were Dennis Quaid and John Cusack considrered big draws after The Day After Tomorrow and 2012? Definitely not. I'd argue that Roland Emmerich was more the draw in both of those. The performers were just recognizable faces that had no impact on its performance. As Excel said, the genre was the main star. I actually even forgot that Dennis Quaid was in The Day After Tomorrow. 
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat May 30, 2015 8:01 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68214 Location: Seattle, WA
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Variety claim that San Andreas is on for a $47m opening. It has 3D and is in 3,777 cinemas compared to The Day After Tomorrow and 2012's no 3D debuts of $65m and $68m at 300+ less cinemas. It's a great, great opening for The Rock, but I am not convinced this was all his doing. I believe that people were just in need of a blockbuster that wasn't part of an existing franchise. This was an "original" blockbuster. Easy escapism. The Rock didn't hinder its success, but he sure as hell did not manage that $47m on his own. I don't believe the 90s nostalgia was in play either. I just think that it's the summer and $47m isn't so impressive for pretty much any mid-large sized film to obtain. Sure, it feels hugely impressive, though, but that was because predictions were rather low. Warner Bros. must be happy about the opening.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat May 30, 2015 8:54 pm |
|
 |
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Posts: 5811
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Poor for San Andreas, the marketing costs alone was probably higher than its opening weekend numbers based on the saturation of advertising the entire month.
|
Sat May 30, 2015 10:09 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23246 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Yeah the Cusack/Quaid argument does hold water. The Rock did have a far more positive influence on SA than those actors had on their films. That said - SA is obviously a hit because of more than just The Rock.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Sun May 31, 2015 1:18 am |
|
 |
Dil
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:48 pm Posts: 8942 Location: Houston, Texas
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Quote: RthWillSeeYouNow, on 30 May 2015 - 11:41 PM, said:
Sat looking like SA 20.9,PP2 6.1,TL 6,MMFR 5.9,AOU 4.9,ALO 3.8,POLT 3.3
Woah at that San Andreas increase. Apparently, the WC is really going crazy over it and now $50M+ is pretty much a done deal.
|
Sun May 31, 2015 2:54 am |
|
 |
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 35192 Location: Minnesota
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Great increase for San Andreas. Definitely doing over 50 now.
|
Sun May 31, 2015 3:34 am |
|
 |
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36945
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
That is a good increase of SA I don't know how WoM is good for this.
|
Sun May 31, 2015 6:10 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Excel wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: As I asked before: were Dennis Quaid and John Cusack considrered big draws after The Day After Tomorrow and 2012? No but at the point in time the genre was the star. The straight up disaster concept isn't that big of a sell any more. But how do we know that? San Andreas is the first large-scale film of its kind since then. Pompeii and Into the Storm are the only ones comparable and they were just way smaller in their presentation.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun May 31, 2015 8:06 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Friday Numbers (05/29)
Magnus wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: As I asked before: were Dennis Quaid and John Cusack considrered big draws after The Day After Tomorrow and 2012? you're being a jabroni. TDAT/2012 were much more larger scale disaster films. Their basic premise was more appealing regardless of the stars. As Flava said, TDAT had global warming (and the controversey that came with it) and 2012 had the Mayan prophecy. Both were also much bigger films. TDAT cost 125m (which with inflation is well over 150m these days) and 2012 cost 200m. San Andreas is 110m. Those two films also had marketing campaigns with better money shots involving the destruction. Most of San Andreas marketing centered around The Rock. If you think San Andreas opens to 40m+ with John Cusack or Dennis Quaid, you're just wrong. But at the same time, TDAT's opening adjusts to almost $90 million, 2012 to $70 million - without 3D. Did The Rock help? Sure. Did he help more than an additional $5-7 million? Not so sure.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun May 31, 2015 8:09 am |
|
|