| Author |
Message |
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
 Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release How much would it make, domestically and worldwide?
I think it would have a shot at making more than SW1's re-release in 1997 with the help of 3D and IMAX, and I could see $300m WW.
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:11 am |
 
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release take the 97 star wars re-release adjust then double and thats titanic when they release in 3-D sometime in the next 10 years. so approx. 450m+ domestically.
_________________The Force Awakens
Last edited by BJ on Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:06 am |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Another $400 or so mil.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:07 am |
|
|
|
MGKC
---------
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I didn't think people are as keen to watch older movies again in theaters anymore, unless it's like a cult movie (Nightmare Before Christmas). It'll be very interesting to see how Toy Story 1 & 2 do later this year.
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:15 am |
|
|
|
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release probably just Libs.
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:49 am |
|
|
|
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23379
Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Star Wars (reissue) came out just before the DVD and internet boom (or in its infancy). I dont think Titanic would get anywhere near as close. Perhaps $70-$80m for the 3D aspect.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:03 am |
|
|
|
Optimus_Prime
Okay, I Believe You But My Tommy Gun Don't
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 817
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Cinephiles will pay anything to see an old movie restored and on the big screen. However, Titanic is not one of those movies, the general movie going public is not going to pay full admission for a movie they can get on Netflix. Paramount could be smart and advertise Titanic 3-D/ IMAX as a bargain ticket, like 4-6 dollars, I think you would see decent buisness with that, at least Ghost of the Abyss buisness.
_________________
"Do we look like the type of store that sells "I Just Called To Say I Loved You," go to the mall."
I HATE MICHAEL BAY
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:40 am |
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I, for one, would be lined up cash in hand for a Titanic re-release in any theatrical format - - I hate watching movies on my measly 55" home theater - - movies like Titanic are made for the big screen!
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:57 am |
|
|
|
nghtvsn
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release you only get lightening in a bottle once.
3-D isn't going to make the 3hr flick suddenly get another 400 million in the coffers. I'd be surprised if it made more than 100 domestically. Seriously, who is going to want to re-watch that flick in theatres again just for the 3-D effect?
_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN
45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:11 am |
|
|
|
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release nghtvsn wrote: Seriously, who is going to want to re-watch that flick in theatres again just for the 3-D effect? sign me up
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:44 am |
|
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Shit, I'd see it again in 3D.
It wouldn't make $400m+, that's ridiculous. But around $150-200m? Def.
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:52 am |
|
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Shit, I'd see it again in 3D.
It wouldn't make $400m+, that's ridiculous. But around $150-200m? Def.
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:52 am |
|
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release loyalfromlondon wrote: nghtvsn wrote: Seriously, who is going to want to re-watch that flick in theatres again just for the 3-D effect? sign me up Me, too. _________________
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:58 am |
|
|
|
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release from Time Magazine's article Quote: The lights dim in the screening room. Suddenly, the doomed Titanic fills the screen--but not the way I remember in the movie. The luxury liner is nearly vertical, starting its slide into the black Atlantic, and Leonardo DiCaprio is hanging on for life, just like always. But this time, I am too. The camera pans to the icy water far below, pulling me into the scene--the sensation reminds me of jerking awake from a dream--and I grip the sides of my seat to keep from falling into the drink.
Most of us have seen the top-grossing film of all time. But not like this. The new version, still in production, was remade in digital 3-D, a technology that's finally bringing a true third dimension to movies. Without giving you a headache.
Had digital 3-D been available a dozen or so years ago when he shot Titanic, he'd have used it, director James Cameron tells me later. "But I didn't have it at the time," he says ruefully. "Certainly every film I'm planning to do will be in 3-D." 
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:03 am |
|
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release _________________
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:09 am |
|
|
|
Jiffy
Forum General
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I'd definitely see this, although that's partially cuz I didn't see it in theaters the first time around.
I'm not sure how big it would be, though. I think perception has come full circle now that the backlash has pretty much subsided, but I dunno if it's possible for the $75-100m re-release to return.
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:52 am |
|
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21895
Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Titanic is more ET, than Star Wars. It has the record sure, but it would be like if someone rereleased My Big Fat Greek Wedding. Because of 3D I'll say it has a shot at 2nd biggest rerelease ever, which is what Empire Strikes Back and 67 million?
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:46 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release You will shoot yourself?
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:53 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I'd definitely see it too.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:13 pm |
|
|
|
newfoundglorysp
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:10 pm
Posts: 1093
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release the shot of the iceberg would be awesome in 3-d. i think it'd be pretty epic, i'd probably pay full price to see it, seeing as its been a good 10 years since I last viewed.
_________________
TOP 5 MOVIES
1. The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou
2. The Royal Tenenbaums
3. No Country for Old Men
4. Rushmore
5. Being John Malkovich
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:32 pm |
|
|
|
Jiffy
Forum General
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release They could probably do a limited IMAX release in some December and then expand wide to regular 3D theaters in January.
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:39 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Domestic Re-Release- $399.2 mil
International Re-Release- $757.9 mil
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:43 pm |
|
|
|
Jiffy
Forum General
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release LOL, I wonder what it's overseas gross would adjust to now. Probably about $2B, eh?
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:45 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Jiffy208 wrote: LOL, I wonder what it's overseas gross would adjust to now. Probably about $2B, eh? That's a good question for Box! _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:49 pm |
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Jiffy208 wrote: LOL, I wonder what it's overseas gross would adjust to now. Probably about $2B, eh? 3.0b-3.5b for sure. _________________The Force Awakens
|
| Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:17 pm |
|
|
