Author |
Message |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
I'd rather unsticky Trailer Reactions thread since it doesn't gather enough discussion and is not fully related box office in the first place. I'd in fact move it to Trailers forum instead if there is no objection.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:53 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
No objection, should be part of the crowd reports anyway...
In addition you could put the question in the Archive thread wether to unstick it. If users demand it to stay sticky, let it stay, but my guess is that there will be almost no feedback...
I would rather sticky the INTL thread...
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:57 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
423 B- ELM 101 C FURRY
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Sat May 01, 2010 4:42 am |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
709 A- IM2 26 B BABIES
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri May 07, 2010 1:19 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
892 A- IM2 32 B+ BABIES
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri May 07, 2010 4:37 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
1005 A- IM2 38 B+ BABIES
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri May 07, 2010 5:58 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
1066 A- IM2 40 B+ BABIES
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri May 07, 2010 7:15 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
132 B Robin 77 A- Juliet 69 B+ Wright
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri May 14, 2010 6:33 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
191 A- SHREK 4 113 B- MACGRUBER
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri May 21, 2010 7:54 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Shrek 4 has only 221 reviews right now - averaging just 15 each of the last two hours. Even if it hits 300 reviews tonight (which I doubt), it would need a ratio of 15 just to reach a $20m Friday.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Fri May 21, 2010 9:55 pm |
|
|
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32122 Location: the last free city
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
AAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!
_________________ Is it 2024 yet?
|
Fri May 21, 2010 10:03 pm |
|
|
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6150 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
There is no way it does sub 20m OW. It would be hilarious though.
_________________ .
|
Fri May 21, 2010 11:29 pm |
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Waker of Winds wrote: There is no way it does sub 20m OW. It would be hilarious though. He's talking about opening day.
|
Fri May 21, 2010 11:41 pm |
|
|
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6150 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
I meant OD.
_________________ .
|
Fri May 21, 2010 11:49 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Sex & The City 2 has 152 reviews at this hour with a grade of C+.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Thu May 27, 2010 7:14 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
We're at 181 reviews right now. I project 240 or so at the current pace. I don't see a ratio of 10 for SATC2, so I'm thinking about $20m for Thursday.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Thu May 27, 2010 10:11 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
It's a shame Yahoo is no longer useful - it used to be a lot of fun. Thought I'd take one final stab at it last night, but it's obviously curtains for our old friend. We sure impressed a lot of people with (generally) accurate projections over the years, so as I bid farewell to Yahoo Review tracking, I extend a special thanks to xiayun, Horlicks, DP07, Zing, and the countless others who kept extensive records, provided insight, and offered their time with hourly updates. We built something from the ground up that we should all be proud of. So long, Yahoo - it's been a blast.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Fri May 28, 2010 3:51 pm |
|
|
Proud Ryu
Deshi Basara
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:36 pm Posts: 5322 Location: The Interstice
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Is Yahoo tracking something that possibly has merely trended, or is it 100% useless? I didn't become interested until about the time people started saying it was useless, so I didn't bother. If it's completely useless, is it because of people flocking to twitter/facebook/other now instead?
|
Fri May 28, 2010 4:50 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Proud Ryu wrote: Is Yahoo tracking something that possibly has merely trended, or is it 100% useless? I didn't become interested until about the time people started saying it was useless, so I didn't bother. If it's completely useless, is it because of people flocking to twitter/facebook/other now instead? The ratios are so inconsistent that reliable tracking just isn't possible anymore. It seems the number of users on Yahoo has dwindled the last couple of years. As to where they've gone is anyone's guess, but the rapid growth of social networking sites is a viable explanation.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Fri May 28, 2010 6:59 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
146 A- A-TEAM 93 B- KARATE KID
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:22 pm |
|
|
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Huh. Considering what people expected (and taking into account that Sony's supposedly through the roof positive testing for TKK) I expected the situation to be reversed. We'll see how the grades will change after more reviews are added, but I like things just as fine now.
|
Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:40 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Yahoo reviews are dead, guys. The numbers don't mean anything anymore.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:02 pm |
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm Posts: 13041 Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
It's not about the numbers, it's about WOM...
_________________ Nothing Compares 2 U
|
Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:07 pm |
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm Posts: 9148 Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
mark66 wrote: It's not about the numbers, it's about WOM... Yeah, the grades are still somewhat helpful, but usually not for OW.
_________________ Making Predictions Great Again!
|
Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:08 pm |
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36923
|
Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Not really sure how others might thing but I saw both and would have given A-Team better rating than TKK. I think TKK is better than B- somewhere around B+ or A- though A-Team I would have definitely given A.
|
Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:08 pm |
|
|