| Author |
Message |
|
Lotan
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:25 pm
Posts: 1222
|
 Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Mike wrote: My cousin had a huge crush on Leo and saw it 19 times  . She rarely even sees a movie twice theatrically. She saved all of the ticket stubs. How many times she watched The Man in the Iron Mask?
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:26 am |
|
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35248
Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release loyalfromlondon wrote: Just curious Mike, how old were you in 1998? And your cousin? I was 13 and she was 22.
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:31 am |
|
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 35248
Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Lotan wrote: Mike wrote: My cousin had a huge crush on Leo and saw it 19 times . She rarely even sees a movie twice theatrically. She saved all of the ticket stubs. How many times she watched The Man in the Iron Mask? I'd have to ask her. I think it might have only been once. I don't think she was that crazy about it.
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:34 am |
|
|
|
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Bradley Witherberry wrote: I, for one, would be lined up cash in hand for a Titanic re-release in any theatrical format - - I hate watching movies on my measly 55" home theater - - movies like Titanic are made for the big screen!  People have seen this movie so much folks since it's DVD/VHS release that no one will care to pay and see this again, even if it's in 3D..
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:09 am |
|
|
|
Lotan
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:25 pm
Posts: 1222
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Mike wrote: Lotan wrote: Mike wrote: My cousin had a huge crush on Leo and saw it 19 times . She rarely even sees a movie twice theatrically. She saved all of the ticket stubs. How many times she watched The Man in the Iron Mask? I'd have to ask her. I think it might have only been once. I don't think she was that crazy about it. That's the point. She hasn't been going 19 times to Titanic just to see Leo.
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:04 am |
|
|
|
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Box wrote: They were absolutely not isolated cases. I remember kids at my school competing with each other to see who saw the film the most number of times. weren't you in kindergarten in 1997?
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:25 am |
|
|
|
BK
Forum General
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release 150m max. (in today's market so whenever it comes out adjust for inflation)
_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:37 am |
|
|
|
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Pretty much ensures Titanic isn't leaving the top of the domestic chart anytime soon.
LOTR 3D rerelease, SW 3D rerelease, nothing will be able to pass a $700m, $750m, $800m film.
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:49 am |
|
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I'm actually not that convinced that it'll make huge bucks. Other than Star Wars Episode 4, no relatively recent re-release came close to $100m i think and that was before DVDs became ubiquitous. Dunno if 3D alone will entice people enough to fork out another $10 for a movie they've probably already seen a couple of times in theaters and at home, even if it's Titanic.
For now i'd say somewhere between $50m and $100m, which would still be pretty neat.
_________________
Last edited by Nazgul9 on Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:52 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Did someone just post thrice? W.T.F
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:39 pm |
|
|
|
jmovies
Let's Call It A Bromance
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I can't see over $60M for this.
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:47 pm |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release jmovies wrote: I can't see over $60M for this. then you need better glasses. _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:48 pm |
|
|
|
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release $60 million.
_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:21 pm |
|
|
|
MGKC
---------
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Box wrote: Did someone just post thrice? W.T.F lol
|
| Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:49 pm |
|
|
|
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5824
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release *bump now that Avatar is a blockbuster
|
| Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:08 pm |
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Well if would be marvelous to see it in 3D extra price or not but it would definitely be affected for re-runs since a lot of people have seen the movie multiple times. Hell Star Movies made it run back to back on 2009 saying it is the best movie of the century.
But even with once viewing it could be close to 100M-150M WW.
|
| Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:38 am |
|
|
|
Archangel
Forum General
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 9998
Location: Australia
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Domestic - Probably another $300m, Overseas add another $600m.
This will be an event in itself, if they perhaps maybe through in some never before scenes in there as well and market it as "you have not seen anything yet"
_________________
Im Archangel. Telin le thaed.
Lasto beth nin, tolo dan nan galad.
I surrender who I've been for who you are
Nothing makes me stronger than your fragile heart
If I had only felt how it feels to be yours
I would have known what I've been living for all along
What I've been living for
|
| Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:06 am |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I don't see that at all. It is not such a must-see film for masses and rendering it 3D after Avatar will look like a money-grab to most.
No more than $70 million domestically. I agree that LOTR in 3D would probably perform better.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:15 pm |
|
|
|
jmovies
Let's Call It A Bromance
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Avatar will still be #1 
|
| Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:41 pm |
|
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13056
Location: Augsburg (2,040 years young)
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release And, as Cameron noted in hailing "a century of Gloria Stuart," her prolific-ness doesn't stop there. "Gloria's so alive, and her creativity, her artistry and the sparkle in her eyes is a challenge to all of us to live as fully and richly as she has and will continue to do as she heads into her 101st year," said the director, who's converting the blockbuster into 3 -D for re-release in April 2012, the 100th anniversary of the ship's sinking. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/ ... tanic.html...and happy belated Birthday, Gloria!
_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U
|
| Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:36 am |
|
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Can't wait to relive the magic that is Titanic, in 3D no less!  _________________
|
| Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:19 am |
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release I'm looking forward to see Titanic in the theatre again, but I definitely won't be seeing it in 3D.
|
| Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:04 am |
|
|
|
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Provided it gets re-released in 2D as well...
_________________
|
| Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:33 am |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Nazgul9 wrote: Provided it gets re-released in 2D as well... Unlikely. _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:40 am |
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
Re: Titanic 3-D/IMAX Re-Release Let it be known that I don't mind paying premium prices for the premium experience of seeing it in 2D - - brighter picture and colors, comfortable classic viewing.
Though hopefully the 3D fad will be well on the way out by that time...
|
| Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:51 am |
|
|
