Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jun 09, 2025 3:34 pm



Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 Mr and Mrs Smith DID OPEN with $50M! 
Author Message
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
Oh what the hell, count me in. I agree that the best thing it has going for it is that it is very summery and light, and the humor will help.

I'm thinking now 45-50/175ish. How do you see the final gross shaping up?


Fri May 27, 2005 7:26 pm
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
The newest issue of Entertainment Weekly is a cover story featuring Mr. and Mrs. Smith and an interview with Doug Liman. Interesting read.


Fri May 27, 2005 7:33 pm
Profile
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
The newest Time has a nice photo of Jolie in a shirt and little else, interesting read too.

Actually they also have some interesting quotes from Doug Liman about the movie, it's worth checking out for anyone following this flick.


Fri May 27, 2005 7:34 pm
Profile WWW
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
I think it will make $45-$50 opening weekend, so count me in. Angelina Jolie is not the wisest actress. She doesn't seem to pick very good roles, but this movie looks different. It looks like a lot of fun, and I think she is going to be great in this role.


Fri May 27, 2005 7:36 pm
Profile YIM WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15530
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Archie Gates wrote:
I don't know under or over 50m but I do expect it to do better than I earlier thought it wuold, based on new TV ads that are better than the trailer.

However in the ads they pretty much give away a 3rd act twist. In whiteout if you don't mind things being spoiled.

The implication in the TV ads is that Mr and Mrs Smith form a truce and join forces to take down a bad guy. They have a shot of the bad guy saying "It's the Smiths! Send everyone." and another shot of Pitt and Jolie appear to be fighting side by side against others.


That always seemed like an obvious twist to me though from the time I first heard of the concept.


Sat May 28, 2005 3:05 am
Profile ICQ
Veteran

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:08 pm
Posts: 3165
Location: New Zealand
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Jolie is box-office poison of the worst kind. Other than that, I would expect this movie to be big, but really Jolie brings bad luck to pretty much all movies she stars in. I expect it to open with around $35 million.


I'd like to believe that her luck will change with this film fo rall of the reasons above that box stated and the fact that she hasn't been on screen for some time. Now she returns with her rumoured lover in a comedic draw. Hot! Many are in need of some humour.

_________________

'The stars in the sky...
Bring tears to my eyes...
They're lighting my way... tonight.

And I haven't felt so alive..
In years.'




MOS
Image


Sat May 28, 2005 3:10 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Hey look, it's Charlies Angels 2 all over again! Sorry folks, but I think I'm going to have to be the naysayer and go with a "dissapointing" 35 million opening. ;) I'm just not sure that the press with Jolie + Pitt is a good thing, as they certainly haven't come off very well from the whole affair. And the movie looks like a lot of fun to me, but I'm just not sure how much audiences will love a movie about a husband and wife beating each other up for an hour (before the inevitable *sigh* SPOILER: team up) and Brad Pitt shooting people riding a kids bike. It just doesn't have that even status that makes me think 50 million. Maybe 40 million, but after that I think we're getting too carried away for our own good. I'll stick to my 35/90 guess though.


Sat May 28, 2005 4:47 am
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:44 am
Posts: 2375
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Post 
I'd love to see that happen, but i think it's not going to.

Angelina Jolie didn't have a hit since 2001, and Brad Pitt is a big star, but he's not the huge BO draw everybody's thinking he is. All the movies where he was the main attraction have either disappointed ( Troy, The Mexican, Spy Game, Meet Joe Black ) or bombed ( Fight Club, Seven Years In Tibet ).

I'm thinking 30 m opening, with about 85 total.


Sat May 28, 2005 9:56 am
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Yeah people, isnt this like the 3rd Brad Pitt movie in a row thats being overpredicted in terms of opening numbers. Lets not start those crazy 60 million opening fro Troy just because Brad Pitt was in it or Ocean's 12 opening up to 50 million just because its a sequel to a hit. I dont even need to use list Queen poison herself since shes on a good carange streak except for Shark Tales

I say a 35 million opening maybe lower


Sat May 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 2120
Post 
surprisingly positive reviews to begin... keep your eyes on this one...
If the string reviews continue, it will undoubltedly cement a 50 million open....

_________________
spaces.msn.com/members/metropolis19


Wed Jun 01, 2005 2:15 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
Ok people, come on.


You know I'm kinda right :razz:


Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:05 pm
Profile WWW
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
This is getting mostly panned by the major reviewers, I no longer think it has a chance at 50.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:35 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
The Cream of the Crop is low, but at metacritic, its score is over 60, so I wouldn't say it's getting panned by major critics. The reviews are very much on par with I, Robot.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:08 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
matatonio wrote:
i dont see it opening above $50M, i think it will fall short, but its will be close :smile:


i still think it will fall short of the $50M


Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
I'm feeling more confident that it CAN open to $50 million. I'm with ya, box. :)


Wed Jun 08, 2005 3:13 pm
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
I just don't think a non-sequel movie that's the first of its kind can open that high. It's not based on anything recognizable. Plus, it doesn't feel that "epic" of sorts.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:02 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
I just don't think a non-sequel movie that's the first of its kind can open that high. It's not based on anything recognizable. Plus, it doesn't feel that "epic" of sorts.

I, Robot, Charlie's Angels, Van Helsing, The Day After Tomorrow, etc.

The first two are the only good comparisons (the first Charlie's Angels, BTW) in terms of style/appeal, but, still. Don't count it out.

Charlie's Angels is a very good comparison. Adjusted for 2005, it'd be at $47,648,000. It's not quite $50m, but it's close enough. Heh. :razz:


Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:08 pm
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
torrino wrote:
I, Robot, Charlie's Angels, Van Helsing, The Day After Tomorrow, etc.

The first two are the only good comparisons (the first Charlie's Angels, BTW) in terms of style/appeal, but, still. Don't count it out.

Charlie's Angels is a very good comparison. Adjusted for 2005, it'd be at $47,648,000. It's not quite $50m, but it's close enough. Heh. :razz:

I had a long post written out listing all of the movies not based on previous material, but I decided not to post it as it was boring.

Plus Charlie's Angels had little to no competition that weekend. It was only Meet the Parents.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:16 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
torrino wrote:
I, Robot, Charlie's Angels, Van Helsing, The Day After Tomorrow, etc.

The first two are the only good comparisons (the first Charlie's Angels, BTW) in terms of style/appeal, but, still. Don't count it out.

Charlie's Angels is a very good comparison. Adjusted for 2005, it'd be at $47,648,000. It's not quite $50m, but it's close enough. Heh. :razz:

I had a long post written out listing all of the movies not based on previous material, but I decided not to post it as it was boring.

Plus Charlie's Angels had little to no competition that weekend. It was only Meet the Parents.


I'm not exactly sure how much competition Mr. & Mrs. Smith really has. Other than perhaps Madagascar, I don't see anything else making above $20M.

Also, if summer has showed us anything before (specifically, the same weekend last year when 5 films made over $20M), there is plenty of room in the marketplace.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:18 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
Neither does Mr. and Mrs. Smith, really. There might be four movies opening, but it's got a hold on its demographics. The other movies have very, very specific appeal (maybe The Honeymooners doesn't, but that won't pass $35m overall anyways...). Plus, it's not like there's been an overload of stylized movies or action-comedies like Mr. and Mrs. Smith. I almost think $40m is a lock.


Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:19 pm
Profile
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15530
Location: Everywhere
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
torrino wrote:
I, Robot, Charlie's Angels, Van Helsing, The Day After Tomorrow, etc.

The first two are the only good comparisons (the first Charlie's Angels, BTW) in terms of style/appeal, but, still. Don't count it out.

Charlie's Angels is a very good comparison. Adjusted for 2005, it'd be at $47,648,000. It's not quite $50m, but it's close enough. Heh. :razz:

I had a long post written out listing all of the movies not based on previous material, but I decided not to post it as it was boring.


I probably would have found it to be very interesting. :smile:


Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm
Profile ICQ
Horror Hound
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:44 pm
Posts: 6228
Post 
Hmmm....right now i'm saying $35,000,000-$40,000,000.

I see it just under $40M.

Obviously, though, i hope for the best.


Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:54 am
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
I think it will open with under 35 mill.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Thu Jun 09, 2005 7:03 am
Profile WWW
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post 
Nah not gonna hit 50. Low 40's seems likely.

Someone made a coment on Brad Pitt and Troy ... maybe it wasn't the 60 million everyone predicted, but I think judging how the US treats epics, that 46 is quite good.

_________________
Image


Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:59 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
It'll hit 50...who's going to detract from it? Howl's Moving Castle? :lol:

The top three need to drop a bit this week, they've already been around a long time, and last weeks releases have proven not to be competition even their opening weekend, more or less they're second one.

50 Million baby!

Archie Gates wrote:
I don't know under or over 50m but I do expect it to do better than I earlier thought it wuold, based on new TV ads that are better than the trailer.

However in the ads they pretty much give away a 3rd act twist. In whiteout if you don't mind things being spoiled.

The implication in the TV ads is that Mr and Mrs Smith form a truce and join forces to take down a bad guy. They have a shot of the bad guy saying "It's the Smiths! Send everyone." and another shot of Pitt and Jolie appear to be fighting side by side against others.


Likewise:

Even in the movie trailer I noticed that. It wasn't nearly so elaborate, but there is one quick scene showinbg the house blowing up and both of them diving out of it together. I was cautious to read too much into it, but I pretty much assumed seeing people dive side by side out of a house blowing up meant they were both running from a third party. I'm pretty sure the plot is that they're considered accessory and their respective agencies (or whatever) devise this plot to kill two birds with one stone. Basically they don't want either around anymore. Something tells me the Smiths figure it out, and pull back together to survive.

In an interview Brad stated the movies was about a couple that literally wanted to kill eachother, they'de become so jaded and bored with eachother. When they go about trying to finish eachother off, the old flame is reignited, but a little late as they realize its a trap. They ultimately come together over and I bet they come out on top as a couple.

Pretty straightforeward...Still should be oddles of fun though.


Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:06 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.