Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:40 pm



Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Could it be that 2 of the big 3 fall under 300 mil? 
Author Message
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post 
spiderman 3 is a lock for 300 million.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Fri May 04, 2007 7:48 pm
Profile
Wall-E

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:07 am
Posts: 883
Post 
Quote:
If MTF can come within $20M of the mark, NT2 can clear it, methinks.


I think Meet the Parents had better word of mouth, and it was a smaller movie than National Treasure, so it sequel would have more room for expansion.


Fri May 04, 2007 9:16 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:43 pm
Posts: 2252
Location: Wellsville, MO
Post 
I'm a hardcore Pirates fan, and I haven't even gone to Yahoo to vote for PotC, much less give SM3 a bad grade. And on IMDb, I only rate the films I've actually seen.

Joy


Fri May 04, 2007 9:28 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post 
where are people getting this idea that the word of mouth is horrible? spidey 2 wooulda done 3.5 had it opened on a friday. spidey 3 minimum multiplier is 2.5 and thatsreally pushing it. kids love this and will be seeing ti all summer.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Fri May 04, 2007 10:19 pm
Profile
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post 
WE GOT RANDY MOSS!! wrote:
where are people getting this idea that the word of mouth is horrible? spidey 2 wooulda done 3.5 had it opened on a friday. spidey 3 minimum multiplier is 2.5 and thatsreally pushing it. kids love this and will be seeing ti all summer.


By reading.

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Fri May 04, 2007 11:10 pm
Profile WWW
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: The Graveyard
Post 
Nah, tho I see Spider-Man 3 with a chance at 315-330 now, and Shrek in that range too.

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Fri May 04, 2007 11:25 pm
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:57 am
Posts: 4669
Location: Anchorage, AK
Post 
Spiderman was pretty bad, but I still see ateast a 2.7 multiplyer. No way it makes less than 300m

Shrek is the one, It will fail to make 300m. Potter 5 will fucking own it.

_________________
My Most anticipated films of 2015


Image


Fri May 04, 2007 11:30 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 2120
Post 
Jmart007 wrote:
WE GOT RANDY MOSS!! wrote:
where are people getting this idea that the word of mouth is horrible? spidey 2 wooulda done 3.5 had it opened on a friday. spidey 3 minimum multiplier is 2.5 and thatsreally pushing it. kids love this and will be seeing ti all summer.


By reading.


Hmm, perhaps you should judge it by seeing... reading about a movie is not always accurate.. i saw it with a sold out crowd . Yeah, the quality isn't up there with the first two, but the film itself is still enjoyable, especially the final fight scene.. It certainly could have been a little less cheesy (there's a lot of cheese!), but people were cheering at the end, and generally I was hearing a lot of positive feedback.

I can understand how die hard Spidey fans might have been disappointed with the film, but you guys are making a huge mistake by basing your opinions on what a the diehard fans who saw the midnights had to say.... you'll notice that once the general audience has seen the film this weekend, the WOM isnt nearly what you people think it is.

To even think about comparing it to Catwoman, or The Hulk, or Batman in Robin is stupid, and I think a big over-reaction.

I could respect it if you saw the film and that was your own opinion.
But to say that it is based on what you have been reading, I think is a huge mistake.

And I don't mean that in a rude way, or to attack you. It's really just a statement to everyone..

_________________
spaces.msn.com/members/metropolis19


Fri May 04, 2007 11:42 pm
Profile WWW
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post 
Bryan_smith wrote:
Jmart007 wrote:
WE GOT RANDY MOSS!! wrote:
where are people getting this idea that the word of mouth is horrible? spidey 2 wooulda done 3.5 had it opened on a friday. spidey 3 minimum multiplier is 2.5 and thatsreally pushing it. kids love this and will be seeing ti all summer.


By reading.


Hmm, perhaps you should judge it by seeing... reading about a movie is not always accurate.. i saw it with a sold out crowd . Yeah, the quality isn't up there with the first two, but the film itself is still enjoyable, especially the final fight scene.. It certainly could have been a little less cheesy (there's a lot of cheese!), but people were cheering at the end, and generally I was hearing a lot of positive feedback.

I can understand how die hard Spidey fans might have been disappointed with the film, but you guys are making a huge mistake by basing your opinions on what a the diehard fans who saw the midnights had to say.... you'll notice that once the general audience has seen the film this weekend, the WOM isnt nearly what you people think it is.

To even think about comparing it to Catwoman, or The Hulk, or Batman in Robin is stupid, and I think a big over-reaction.

I could respect it if you saw the film and that was your own opinion.
But to say that it is based on what you have been reading, I think is a huge mistake.

And I don't mean that in a rude way, or to attack you. It's really just a statement to everyone..


http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=125

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Fri May 04, 2007 11:46 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post 
word is its a lot like spidey 1 instead of spidey 2.

thats good for word of mouth amongst teens n kids n famililes but bad for adults.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Fri May 04, 2007 11:51 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 2120
Post 
Jmart007 wrote:
Bryan_smith wrote:
Jmart007 wrote:
WE GOT RANDY MOSS!! wrote:
where are people getting this idea that the word of mouth is horrible? spidey 2 wooulda done 3.5 had it opened on a friday. spidey 3 minimum multiplier is 2.5 and thatsreally pushing it. kids love this and will be seeing ti all summer.


By reading.


Hmm, perhaps you should judge it by seeing... reading about a movie is not always accurate.. i saw it with a sold out crowd . Yeah, the quality isn't up there with the first two, but the film itself is still enjoyable, especially the final fight scene.. It certainly could have been a little less cheesy (there's a lot of cheese!), but people were cheering at the end, and generally I was hearing a lot of positive feedback.

I can understand how die hard Spidey fans might have been disappointed with the film, but you guys are making a huge mistake by basing your opinions on what a the diehard fans who saw the midnights had to say.... you'll notice that once the general audience has seen the film this weekend, the WOM isnt nearly what you people think it is.

To even think about comparing it to Catwoman, or The Hulk, or Batman in Robin is stupid, and I think a big over-reaction.

I could respect it if you saw the film and that was your own opinion.
But to say that it is based on what you have been reading, I think is a huge mistake.

And I don't mean that in a rude way, or to attack you. It's really just a statement to everyone..


http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=125


alright, you've certainly got me there, but to be fair, you're reply in this thread gave no indication that you saw it at all. ;)

I still think there is a general over-reaction to the WOM...
Even the Yahoo score is a decent B with over 6000 reviews...

_________________
spaces.msn.com/members/metropolis19


Fri May 04, 2007 11:54 pm
Profile WWW
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: The Graveyard
Post 
It's nothing like 1. 1 was awesome. 3 has too much in it, and introduces it in akward and ridiculous ways. And the middle of the movie blows.

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Fri May 04, 2007 11:55 pm
Profile WWW
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post 
Bryan_smith wrote:
Jmart007 wrote:
Bryan_smith wrote:
Jmart007 wrote:
WE GOT RANDY MOSS!! wrote:
where are people getting this idea that the word of mouth is horrible? spidey 2 wooulda done 3.5 had it opened on a friday. spidey 3 minimum multiplier is 2.5 and thatsreally pushing it. kids love this and will be seeing ti all summer.


By reading.


Hmm, perhaps you should judge it by seeing... reading about a movie is not always accurate.. i saw it with a sold out crowd . Yeah, the quality isn't up there with the first two, but the film itself is still enjoyable, especially the final fight scene.. It certainly could have been a little less cheesy (there's a lot of cheese!), but people were cheering at the end, and generally I was hearing a lot of positive feedback.

I can understand how die hard Spidey fans might have been disappointed with the film, but you guys are making a huge mistake by basing your opinions on what a the diehard fans who saw the midnights had to say.... you'll notice that once the general audience has seen the film this weekend, the WOM isnt nearly what you people think it is.

To even think about comparing it to Catwoman, or The Hulk, or Batman in Robin is stupid, and I think a big over-reaction.

I could respect it if you saw the film and that was your own opinion.
But to say that it is based on what you have been reading, I think is a huge mistake.

And I don't mean that in a rude way, or to attack you. It's really just a statement to everyone..


http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=125


alright, you've certainly got me there, but to be fair, you're reply in this thread gave no indication that you saw it at all. ;)



Well of course. I only wrote two words. :funny:

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Fri May 04, 2007 11:57 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post 
I think hell will freeze over if Spiderman 3 doesn't make 300. The worse case is a 2.3 multiplyer like X3 had although I am thinking it will be higher than that.


Sat May 05, 2007 12:52 am
Profile WWW
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post 
No no no. It should manage $340-50m atleast.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Sat May 05, 2007 7:53 am
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post 
word of mouth is piss poor but even then it wont finish with below 350m.


Sat May 05, 2007 12:28 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
350 is no lock, but 300 should still be. There is a remote possibility though, depending on the Saturday number.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Sat May 05, 2007 3:28 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post 
I would eat my hat if it didn't do 300. I think it will do around 350, of course I think it will do around that more because of Shrek 3 and POTC more than anything else.


Sat May 05, 2007 3:38 pm
Profile WWW
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: The Graveyard
Post 
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
I would eat my hat if it didn't do 300. I think it will do around 350, of course I think it will do around that more because of Shrek 3 and POTC more than anything else.


Won't they hurt it even worse though?

Poor WOM in general, from both the general audience, critics, and fans, is an obvious factor to bring it's total down, and also major competition from Shrek and Pirates. It's a doube-whammy, tied in with the poor WOM. It's also possible, that some screens could be taken away since some theatres added it to more because of all the sell-outs. That could even happen this weekend.

Alot of negatives against it's legs, but under 300 seems impossible. 350...I don't know. Using a 140M OW, it's a 2.5X. It should be close in the end. And won't be surprised if it lands around 325-340.

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Sat May 05, 2007 3:46 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Speevy wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Speevy wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Mr. Inc wrote:
How is the WOM bad. Its decent, B - B+ and some bad ones obviously. No, I think all 3 can go over 300.. but who knows which will be the highest.


At yahoo it has the hardcore fans voting. Just about every blockbuster will have an A- at this point. A "B" is terrible and likely means a final of C+ or worse. That is Hulk/Godzilla/B&R territory.


Does Yahoo give a grade breakdown too? Because isn't it a possibility that the 'anti-fan' such as hardcore fans of Pirates would be giving it all F's?


There are a few anti-fans for every movie, but not nearly enough. There are over 3000 votes, so the haters can't have much of an effect. That's why blockbusters with huge numbers of votes always start out will great grades at yahoo unless WOM sucks. If you look through the written reviews you would usually see rows of As at this point from the fans with a few F's between. There are many B's, C's, and many more D's and F's then usual for SM3.


So basically you're saying that a C+/C is very likely to be the final grade for this movie right?


Yeah, I actually doubt it will be any better than C+ after 10 days.


I might have overreacted. It was on the higher half of a B yesterday and it has yet to drop to a B- today. I suppose there is a slight chance it could still finish with a B-, although I'd still bet on a C+.


Sun May 06, 2007 2:47 am
Profile ICQ
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
The IMDb average has dropped from 8.2 with over 2,000 votes on Thursday to 7.9 with over 4,000 votes yesterday and 7.3 with over 10,000 votes after Saturday's update. It should fall below 7 eventually.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Sun May 06, 2007 3:03 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
The WoM is okay, nothing terrible about it. It is just not out-of-this-world excellent like for the last Spidey flick or Batman Begins. It is certainly not worse than for, say, Fantastic Four.

It will top $300 million with relative ease as it'll be at around $180 million after 7 days. I see a total of about $350 million wth Shrek The Third and Pirates biting a chunk out of its audiences, but it'll still sand a fair chance at the top spot of the year.

Basically, I think all three with make $300 million easily with Harry Potter 5 having a shot as well.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun May 06, 2007 10:25 am
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40602
Post 
Yeah it'll past 300 easily with it's OW now.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sun May 06, 2007 4:12 pm
Profile
Squee

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm
Posts: 13270
Location: Yuppieville
Post 
Well 1 out of 3 isn't so bad.

Shrek 3: GUARANTEED to finish below 300.

_________________
Setting most people on fire is wrong.
Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee."

:glare:


Sun May 06, 2007 4:54 pm
Profile
I heet the canadian!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:58 am
Posts: 5192
Location: The Great _______
Post 
Squee wrote:
Well 1 out of 3 isn't so bad.

Shrek 3: GUARANTEED to finish below 300.
Under $208 Million? YOU ARE INSANE!!!


Sun May 06, 2007 4:57 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 178 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.