| Author |
Message |
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Magnus wrote: BJ wrote: wont top 150m looks like crap. A. I just noticed you stole the picture from my sig and didn't ask me.  B. The only blockbuster film this winter that looks like crap is Happy Feet. indeed I did 
Happy Feet will be the shit h8ter, so go take casino royal and cuddle with mr new gay Bond _________________The Force Awakens
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:51 pm |
 
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22198
Location: Places
|
i think happy feet will be good. its cast assures quality, i think. thatll bea big weekend, november 17th. casino royale around 45 million happy feet near 50.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:54 pm |
|
|
|
Supafroius
Star Trek XI
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:59 am
Posts: 370
|
It's got the perfect releae date for this kind of film. 180-200 , Jumanji on Steroids.
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:55 pm |
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
65-80m for happy feet
35m-55m for the new Bond.
_________________The Force Awakens
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:55 pm |
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Supafroius wrote: It's got the perfect releae date for this kind of film. 180-200 , Jumanji on Steroids. the difference is Jumanji looked good, this film could be called a cheep rip off with a new star. _________________The Force Awakens
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:56 pm |
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Magnus wrote: BJ wrote: 65-80m for happy feet
35m-55m for the new Bond.   the new bond is going down
 _________________The Force Awakens
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:58 pm |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
BJ wrote: Supafroius wrote: It's got the perfect releae date for this kind of film. 180-200 , Jumanji on Steroids. the difference is Jumanji looked good, this film could be called a cheep rip off with a new star. this is not a ripoff of Jumanji
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:03 pm |
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
matatonio wrote: BJ wrote: Supafroius wrote: It's got the perfect releae date for this kind of film. 180-200 , Jumanji on Steroids. the difference is Jumanji looked good, this film could be called a cheep rip off with a new star. this is barely a ripoff of Jumanji puulease, this is so much like Jumanji its insane, this looks liek crap though, perhaps with a better trailer I could be swayed into a different light. _________________The Force Awakens
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
BJ wrote: matatonio wrote: BJ wrote: Supafroius wrote: It's got the perfect releae date for this kind of film. 180-200 , Jumanji on Steroids. the difference is Jumanji looked good, this film could be called a cheep rip off with a new star. this is barely a ripoff of Jumanji puulease, this is so much like Jumanji its insane, this looks liek crap though, perhaps with a better trailer I could be swayed into a different light. and how exactly does it look like it?! Just because characters come to life?!
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:06 pm |
|
|
|
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
|
O wrote: neo_wolf wrote: Looks like shit to me.
40/110 So why would you give it a $40 m opening weekend in December then? Well I mean... neo_wolf isn't dumb, he realizes that things he might dislike might make a lot of money.
I'm feeling abot 150-170 mill on this one.
It's cute to see Dick Van Dyke and Mickey Rooney on the big screen.
|
| Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
Erendis
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:40 am
Posts: 1527
Location: Emyn Arnen
|
Inanimate object come to life has been in movies since...well maybe Disney's stuff in the 30's? It's nothing new. I could almost see Night at the Museum as an expansion of the popular IMAX T-Rex movie. (don't see T-rex it's lousy). NatM should do fine.
But I'm no good at multipliers. Um...$32M/120M.
_________________
I'm not around much anymore because I don't have time (or permission, probably) to surf the 'net from my new job.
|
| Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:17 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22198
Location: Places
|
under predicted then over predicted.
48 4 day/188 total. finished second in the winter race.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:11 pm |
|
|
|
ashwani
Wall-E
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:18 am
Posts: 813
|
Magnus wrote: Upon further debate, I have come to the conclusion that this will OWN come winter.
-Fox marketing
-Holiday legs
-Big star power. Stiller, Wilson, and Willaims are all three solid draws that combined will appeal to a VERY wide demograph
-It seems fresh compared to anything else. Eragon...another fantasy and book-adaptation. Happy Feet...another animal-CGI flick. Charlottes Web...another book-adapatation of a story everyone knows and has seen already. This is something new and fresh and I think that's going to attract a lot of people
OW(4-day): 45m
Total: 225m
Beleive it bitches. Winter champ. you know what i have to agree!!!
It looks like it will be a very funny, entertaining and a fresh movie for the audiences. The reactions for the tariler attached with POTC 2 was GREAT!!!
I can totally see this making between $185-$215 million domestically and an F4-2 teaser trailer attached with this will be totally awesome!!!
|
| Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:01 pm |
|
|
|
Erendis
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:40 am
Posts: 1527
Location: Emyn Arnen
|
This movie SERIOUSLY needs to go to IMAX. There are a lot of IMAX in museums, and this would be perfect. I just hope it's not a long movie.
_________________
I'm not around much anymore because I don't have time (or permission, probably) to surf the 'net from my new job.
|
| Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:07 am |
|
|
|
ashwani
Wall-E
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:18 am
Posts: 813
|
Erendis wrote: This movie SERIOUSLY needs to go to IMAX. There are a lot of IMAX in museums, and this would be perfect. I just hope it's not a long movie. THAT WILL BE FREAKING AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
| Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:21 am |
|
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Forum General
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:11 pm
Posts: 9148
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
|
Erendis wrote: This movie SERIOUSLY needs to go to IMAX. There are a lot of IMAX in museums, and this would be perfect. I just hope it's not a long movie. I don't see museums endorsing the idea of creatures coming to life, no matter how fanatical. I'd be surprised if any museums put this on their IMAX screens.
|
| Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:27 am |
|
|
|
Erendis
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:40 am
Posts: 1527
Location: Emyn Arnen
|
Rolling Thunder wrote: I don't see museums endorsing the idea of creatures coming to life, no matter how fanatical. I'd be surprised if any museums put this on their IMAX screens. One film, T-Rex, has been in museums since 1998. It's about 30 minutes of fluff crap (ugly girl and her daddy), and abut 10 minutes of dinosaur CGI.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0163862/
_________________
I'm not around much anymore because I don't have time (or permission, probably) to surf the 'net from my new job.
|
| Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:49 pm |
|
|
