Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jul 03, 2025 7:05 pm



Reply to topic  [ 871 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 35  Next
 Walk the Line Will Surpass 100 Million! DING DING DING!!! 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Yes, people, please join this club.

The more people that join, the better the rest who didn't join will look once y'all realize that this won't pass $100 million.

JOIN!


Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:43 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Yes, people, please join this club.

The more people that join, the better the rest who didn't join will look once y'all realize that this won't pass $100 million.

JOIN!


Those were exactly my thoughrs, hehe. The more people we can make fun of afterwards!

And just a note...

The fact that Ray Charles' death was in the same year as the movie, just months away, helped it immensly.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:47 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:

The fact that Ray Charles' death was in the same year as the movie, just months away, helped it immensly.


Indeed.

Shack had a point with that one, Maverikk. Your failure to answer might be because, well...you had no response. ;)


Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:49 pm
Profile
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:

The fact that Ray Charles' death was in the same year as the movie, just months away, helped it immensly.


Indeed.

Shack had a point with that one, Maverikk. Your failure to answer might be because, well...you had no response. ;)


There is no point with that one. Both Johnny and June died 2 years ago. That's two celebs, not one, and it was only a short time ago that they died. Do you really believe people forgot? If they forgot in 2 years, they forgot 4 months, right? There's no point made if the point is that Johnny Cash didn't recently die, because he did, and so did June.


Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:56 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Forget is definitely not the right one. Hype is more correct, even though "hype" around someone's death sounds morbid, it is pretty much true in this case. It makes sure that also not so die-hard fans would see it.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:58 pm
Profile WWW
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Forget is definitely not the right one. Hype is more correct, even though "hype" around someone's death sounds morbid, it is pretty much true in this case. It makes sure that also not so die-hard fans would see it.


Do you think there's some type of statute of limitation for when you can hype somebody's death? Johnny Just died. Two years have flew by. They can hype the shit out his him being recently deceased, and most people are going to agree that he just died a short time ago, just like Ray Charles did. That argument is weak. WEAK! :nonono:


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:02 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32611
Location: the last free city
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:

The fact that Ray Charles' death was in the same year as the movie, just months away, helped it immensly.


Indeed.

Shack had a point with that one, Maverikk. Your failure to answer might be because, well...you had no response. ;)


There is no point with that one. Both Johnny and June died 2 years ago. That's two celebs, not one, and it was only a short time ago that they died. Do you really believe people forgot? If they forgot in 2 years, they forgot 4 months, right? There's no point made if the point is that Johnny Cash didn't recently die, because he did, and so did June.


if he had died four months before release date,people would be more inclined to rush out to see it in theaters since it's fresh on their mind. they're not going to completely forget ;) but some will choose to wait for it on dvd. hurting it's chance at $100m..............but still top $80m. :D

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:02 pm
Profile
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
revolutions wrote:
if he had died four months before release date,people would be more inclined to rush out to see it in theaters since it's fresh on their mind. they're not going to completely forget ;) but some will choose to wait for it on dvd. hurting it's chance at $100m..............but still top $80m. :D


People aren't going to forget that Johnny and June Carter Cash recently died, either. You guys are seriously reaching if you believe that.


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:05 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Forget is definitely not the right one. Hype is more correct, even though "hype" around someone's death sounds morbid, it is pretty much true in this case. It makes sure that also not so die-hard fans would see it.


Do you think there's some type of statute of limitation for when you can hype somebody's death? Johnny Just died. Two years have flew by. They can hype the shit out his him being recently deceased, and most people are going to agree that he just died a short time ago, just like Ray Charles did. That argument is weak. WEAK! :nonono:


Two years make a difference. Obviously there is no way to prove that right now, but it does make a difference. Even to me. I am not sure if I would have gone to see Ray myself if it wasn't for Charles' recent death.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:08 pm
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32611
Location: the last free city
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
revolutions wrote:
if he had died four months before release date,people would be more inclined to rush out to see it in theaters since it's fresh on their mind. they're not going to completely forget ;) but some will choose to wait for it on dvd. hurting it's chance at $100m..............but still top $80m. :D


People aren't going to forget that Johnny and June Carter Cash recently died, either. You guys are seriously reaching if you believe that.


did i say they will forget?
some will just wait for it on dvd since they had 2 years to deal with it.

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:12 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32611
Location: the last free city
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Maverikk wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Forget is definitely not the right one. Hype is more correct, even though "hype" around someone's death sounds morbid, it is pretty much true in this case. It makes sure that also not so die-hard fans would see it.


Do you think there's some type of statute of limitation for when you can hype somebody's death? Johnny Just died. Two years have flew by. They can hype the shit out his him being recently deceased, and most people are going to agree that he just died a short time ago, just like Ray Charles did. That argument is weak. WEAK! :nonono:


Two years make a difference. Obviously there is no way to prove that right now, but it does make a difference. Even to me. I am not sure if I would have gone to see Ray myself if it wasn't for Charles' recent death.


exactly. WTL will lose those type of audience that helped RAY out.

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:13 pm
Profile
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Two years make a difference. Obviously there is no way to prove that right now, but it does make a difference. Even to me. I am not sure if I would have gone to see Ray myself if it wasn't for Charles' recent death.


It doesn't make that much of a difference, and the proof is that it didn't do gangbusters when it opened. You guys are seriously reaching there.


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:19 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Two years make a difference. Obviously there is no way to prove that right now, but it does make a difference. Even to me. I am not sure if I would have gone to see Ray myself if it wasn't for Charles' recent death.


It doesn't make that much of a difference, and the proof is that it didn't do gangbusters when it opened. You guys are seriously reaching there.


$10,000 PTA isn't good enough? That's a lot more than Walk the Line will get opening weekend.


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:21 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32611
Location: the last free city
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Two years make a difference. Obviously there is no way to prove that right now, but it does make a difference. Even to me. I am not sure if I would have gone to see Ray myself if it wasn't for Charles' recent death.


It doesn't make that much of a difference, and the proof is that it didn't do gangbusters when it opened. You guys are seriously reaching there.


now who's reaching. ;)

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Last edited by Rev on Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:22 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
Maverikk wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Two years make a difference. Obviously there is no way to prove that right now, but it does make a difference. Even to me. I am not sure if I would have gone to see Ray myself if it wasn't for Charles' recent death.


It doesn't make that much of a difference, and the proof is that it didn't do gangbusters when it opened. You guys are seriously reaching there.


$10,000 PTA isn't good enough? That's a lot more than Walk the Line will get opening weekend.


Exactly. A PTA of around $10,000 for a 150 minutes long drama movie featuring an entirely black cast and opening in 2,000 theatres is great!!

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:22 pm
Profile WWW
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
$10,000 PTA isn't good enough? That's a lot more than Walk the Line will get opening weekend.


Well, we'll see, but put Walk the Line up against Harry Potter, and what do you expect? If Ray was up against it, you'd see how weak that argument of people wanting to rush out to see it because he died a little more recently than Cash did.

Again, you guys have done nothing to build your case, and I've provided link after link. Shack continues to make things up and pass them off as facts, and I continue to shoot every instance down where he does that. It's ok to admit you underestimated things.


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:26 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40530
Post 
Maverikk wrote:

I most certainly can prove that it'll get a bigger Oscar push.


NO. YOU. CAN'T.

The marketing for it hasn't started yet. The Oscar push hasn't started yet. Therefore, there is no substantial evidence that it will be pushed more than Ray, and therefore your point does not hold. You as well as I have no idea how the fate of this movie will turn out yet, that it will get as much as Ray. And btw, Ray did get quite a bit, as it needed it to sneak into 5th spot. Obviously you're not the studio head, all this is coming from what you predict is going to happen.


Maverikk wrote:
It's got a better release date, and the reason it does is...you guessed it...(no, you obviously didn't)...so it would get more of an Oscar push.


OMG! 3 weeks earlier! Shocking! AHHHHHHHHH!

And Nov. 18 is earlier than alot of the other BP contenders. Usually they sneak in at the end of December, Munich is on December's last week.

Maverikk wrote:

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050919/COMMENTARY/50919001

"This is a great opportunity for people to contribute funds that will go directly to the heart of this massive relief effort -- and to be among the first to see a film that doesn't open until November 18th, but is already garnering Oscar buzz," says Roeper.



Reviews are strong:


http://www.lff.org.uk/films_details.php?FilmID=892

http://www.twitchfilm.net/archives/003279.html

http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/revie ... viewer=198

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/re ... 1001137060

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117928 ... egoryId=31

http://www.moviecitynews.com/reviews/walktheline.html

http://www.empiremovies.com/reviews/rev ... heline.htm

http://www.moviecitynews.com/reviews/wa ... pride.html

http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/tiff2 ... 005_7.html

Shack wrote:
And by the way I think Joaquin has his nom, and Reese Witherspoon has hers too. She looks impressive.

You know, it can do Best Picture. To me it looks more elevated than Ray, might be the best movie period of 2005. Its got alot of spirit. It could even sweep the big 4, Actor Actress Director and Picture. James Mangold for Director is the weak link. He hasn't *really* proved himself all that much. As good as I thought Girl Interuppted was, his direction was criticized. But I think he'll get a nom.


Shack wrote:
I'm thinking Reese might be a higher regarded frontrunner than him. The reviews are more tilted to her, though they praise both. Oscars galore!



oops...found at the following link. :giggle:

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 50fa637c2a


http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... 2/50903001

"Walk the Line" stars Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon as the man in black and his wife, June Carter Cash. A review can await the film's opening, but let me observe that at one point, during a musical number, I closed my eyes to focus entirely on the music. As someone who knows Cash's music virtually by heart, I was convinced the movie was dubbed: That was Johnny Cash's real voice, just as "Ray" used the original Ray Charles recordings.

At the end of the movie, watching the credits, I was thunderstruck to discover that Phoenix had performed all of Cash's vocals. It was more than just a good impersonation; he nailed them. Witherspoon does her own vocals, too, confirming (as Kevin Spacey did last year with "Beyond the Sea") that gifted actors are sometimes also gifted singers; it's just that we don't know it. If this were an era of movie musicals, these would be singing as well as acting stars. And now that every pop singer since 1940 seems to have a biopic in the wings, that era may be returning indirectly."

Walk the Line continues to build momentum, as it was chosen to open the AFI International Film Festival.

http://www.moviecitynews.com/Notepad/20 ... 0a_pr.html

Here's David Poland's update:

Best Picture: http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists ... cture.html

Best Director: http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists ... ector.html

Best Actor/Supporting Actor: http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists ... Actor.html

Best Actress/Supporting Actress: http://www.moviecitynews.com/columnists ... tress.html


So obviously, it's not just Maverikk's opinion, but the opinion of those who have seen it, who are the foremost experts in the Oscar field. I didn't bother looking for a link talking about how it went over in Toronto, because I destroyed you feable attempt enough already. Again, notice how I backed things up with links, yet you can't do that? Everybody else noticed.



More stats! Awesome!

We've already argued about the reviews in the other thread. I didn't look through all your links, as I've already seen most of them. And wow you found a quote I made in one of my first couple hundred posts, regarding its Oscar potential. Nevermind the fact that I should be allowed to have a change of mind any time I want, and that I can only wonder how many threads you searched through to find discriminating material against me, this thread isn't even about the Oscar race. Its about Walk the Line's box-office. And by the way, is hollywoodbitchslap really all that credible of a review source? In fact all of those with the exception of Variety and Poland aren't really regarded critiques at all.

In 'The Contenders', from just slight lazyness from me, I went straight to RT, which doesn't take hollywoodbitchslap.com. I posted their 3 reviews, and a guy from aintitcool(who is fine, hes just as credible as one of us Maverikk.) The thing is that all 5 had agreed on a similar grade. B+, 8/10, joyous, I love Reese Witherspoon. They all did. All of them said the film suffered in some parts but was enjoyable and fun to watch, with great acting. In fact most of the them leant towards Witherspoon the most of all. All of them said it was just good, again you'll attack me for this, but I'm repeating the RTs in so far.

Maverikk wrote:
Shack wrote:
The Female Demographic/Reese's name-This has been mentioned before, and covered, but I will repeat. In a normal situation yes Reese would help the movie by who she is. Not here. Alot of the crowd will go to the movie to see Reese Witherspoon, but it will be because of the performance, rather than who she is. When you're the #1 frontrunner like she is, you automatically have power in that you will draw crowds in to see the best performance of the year. Because Reese Witherspoon will be getting this advantage, the drawing power she would normally have is already covered by the drawing power of being the #1 actress for the year. Therefore her drawing power with her name is no more than what a normal frontrunner would get. For example Monster was a small nothing flick and made 34 million/59 WW off of Charlize Theron being the one to beat that year. Reese shouldn't have any more advantage. And to add with it: Last year, Foxx had just come off a huge 100 mil+ hit in Collateral, and his Ray performance was getting more acclaim than Reese is right now arguably. If Reese does draw the little she has left in her name, it'll just be enough to equal Foxx or just surpass it by like 0.01%. In any case thats as much as she'll do. This isn't Reese's ballpark for drawing crowds remember. Her last speciality movie that ventured outside the borders for drama was Vanity Fair, and look how that turned out. Also disregarded this, its not like the names will matter much anyways. That'll all come in the critical acclaim and how well it can have legs, and hold on for enough weeks. Also to add one more point: The subject matter itself in this movie doesn't have much female appeal, sorry. In the trailer: Jail, ultimate female turn-off. Hillbillys. Now you argue that yes the southern females will like this, but for everyone else they won't. Country music. Since when is country music hot gossip? That adds to Reese Witherspoon as a country darling not really having talk in their group circles. A man wearing black. He certainly isn't wearing pink. And females aren't that familar with Johnny Cash, at least not nearly as much as males are.


No, it's a fact that Reese Witherspoon sells tickets, and that can't be denied. She continues to sell movies even if they suck. Opening weekend, although some think that's all a draw is, isn't the only thing that constitutes being a draw.


Did you even read what said at all?

Reese Witherspoon's drawing gap over Foxx and Theron will be almost completley cut down, as a) Being #1 frontrunner will cover all the drawing power Reese had before, and will draw in the names that she would draw in anyways. Foxx and Theron had this same power. b) The miniscule advantage Reese still has over them is shortened down in that this is a speciality project, and Reeses strength has been non-existant in movies that aren't chick flick/romantic comedy. c) Jamie Foxx was on fire at this time last year, see below. d) Names, minus Speilburg, don't matter much in Oscar movies. Witherspoon will not have any advantage over Foxx, as explained more below.

Maverikk wrote:
Collateral was 100 million dollar hit because of Tom Cruise, Reese makes her own grosses, so I don't know what that point was, and I don't think you do, either.


The point is that Jamie Foxx was coming off a hit, and due to being the lead hero against Tom Cruise in that movie, he was very much on fire. He was a commodity after Collateral, and he was in a better stride than Reese Witherspoon is right now as her last movie, JLH, disappointed.


Maverikk wrote:
The little she can draw on her name? Are these more of your made up "facts"? She opened a movie in September, relying solely on her name, to more than Jamie Foxx could open a summer film, so how are they equal? Stealth anyone?


Again I don't think you understood what I said up there. I won't deny that in a regular situation she can draw just fine. But if you read the situation I described at the top of the argument, you'd understand that in this movie due to circumstances, she doesn't have any advantage over Foxx's Ray. a)The #1 frontrunner covers her status blah blah, b) Reese hasn't done really anything outside of romcom before, the rest haven't done so well(If you disclose Vanity Fair, how about Pleasentville? And that movie got excellent criticism), c)...whatever you get it.

Maverikk wrote:
Do you think the trailer has to show the two of them fucking in order for people to get a clue that it's a love story? It's easy to tell from that trailer that it's two leads in a love story. Reviews tell you it is.


The main plan on the trailer and plugs so far that is a biopic about Johnny Cash's life. It won't be the goddamn Notebook. Its about him, and tales of his life.

Maverikk wrote:
Girls love stories about disabled kids? Girls LOVE stories about disabled kids? You show me a story about a disbled kid that even comes close to attracting 77% females, and I'll agree that girls love stories about disabled kids. (made up "fact" # 67)


First of all, the 77% argument falls flat. The movie got 77% females because it had no male appeal, the females didn't show in extrodinary numbers(12 mil from them), its just the males didn't show at all. If it had decent 53% females, it would've been in the 20s and not a disappointment from many views. That was a useless statistic to thrown down.

And why do you need statistics to know that girls/women love going to a move and feeling bad for the lead characters/characters? Do you need them for everything? The girls love I Am Sam. Its more than just the young too. Every mother loves feeling bad for a child in a film, because they want to nurse them and so forth. My mom loves those movies, my friend's mom loves those movies, even teenage girls like those movies every once an a while(circa I Am Sam, the most popular teenage girl movie in my class just about).


Maverikk wrote:
Out of nowhere? Ask anybody here that has a modicum of knowledge about box office if that isn't true. I definitely didn't pull that out of thin air, and even the people that don't believe this will make 100 million would tell you that. The white community, from a pure population standpoint, far outnumbers the black community, so in essense, you are telling me that if the whites support Walk the Line and blacks support Ray, many more people will support Walk the Line, because there are many more whites in North America than blacks?


Once again you misunderstood. I said alot of southeners will support Walk the Line more than the average white man, and alot of blacks will support Ray more than the average white man. The average white man falls directly in the middle. In this day and age the average white man likes black people. Add that to the fact that Ray Charles, like Will Smith, Chris Rock Nelson Mandela, P. Diddy, and Denzel Washington, is a white man's black man. He sang the equivilant of white man's music, and with being an old jazzateer, white people love Ray Charles. Its not like Ray was Barbershop and Ray Charles shot up some 'crackas!'. Maybe he wasn't in his prime, but as an old man he was the whitest black-man possible.


Maverikk wrote:
Put Will Smith in a black film and put Will Smith in a film that whites can relate to, and watch how much more the second film will outgross the first.


Oh whats that I hear? Bad Boys II grosses 138 million while Wild Wild West only grosses 113? No way!

Maverikk wrote:


Shack, buddy, you have to research things a bit better before you start stating them. I'm sorry to tear it apart ... I'm sure you took a bit of time ... I've backed things up with links, you backed things up with nothing.


All you did was post a bunch of stats and links, then blasted me and claimed how much better you were at this. You were the one who never backed anything up, you just sent off insults about how I researched badly. Pfft...

And take a bit of time? I'm sure it didn't take nearly as long as it took you to find all your links, find your dirt on me, and write more overall which eventually led to nothing. You didn't really defend yourself, you just blasted off and how right you were and how I didn't research enough. For the record this post right here took twice as long as the original, and I think it wasted a bit of my time.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:34 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32611
Location: the last free city
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
$10,000 PTA isn't good enough? That's a lot more than Walk the Line will get opening weekend.


Well, we'll see, but put Walk the Line up against Harry Potter, and what do you expect? If Ray was up against it, you'd see how weak that argument of people wanting to rush out to see it because he died a little more recently than Cash did.

Again, you guys have done nothing to build your case, and I've provided link after link. Shack continues to make things up and pass them off as facts, and I continue to shoot every instance down where he does that. It's ok to admit you underestimated things.



Image

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:34 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
You have any idea how many links people could have provided you with to prove that movies like The Island and Stealth will at least pass a $50 million total? And how many facts have been provided that Batman Begins will have a huge opening of at least $100 million in five days? And yet all the facts would have failed in those cases.

Weren't everyone saying, BTW, that Harry Potter won't have anything on Walk the Line due to counter-programming?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:35 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Harry Potter, no matter how much denial his fans are in about it, has lost a lot of steam. It's not going to be the 90+ million opener that some of you think it will, and it's also not going to draw in many of the core audience that will opt for Walk the Line. Just check out how virtually uneffected Monster-in-Law was by the behemoth known as Revenge of the Sith, and then get back to me about that counterprogramming argument.


...

Quote:
Well, we'll see, but put Walk the Line up against Harry Potter, and what do you expect? If Ray was up against it, you'd see how weak that argument of people wanting to rush out to see it because he died a little more recently than Cash did.


Whoa there, Maverikk. Let's not jump around, here. So, Harry Potter won't hurt Walk the Line, but it will prevent a $10,000 PTA?

Hmm..

Also, Mav, posting links to a forum of 9000 fans of Johnny Cash doesn't show it'll make $100 million. Posting positive early reviews for Walk the Line doesn't prove it'll make $100 million. Prove your point through box office links, not reviews.


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:43 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Harry Potter, no matter how much denial his fans are in about it, has lost a lot of steam. It's not going to be the 90+ million opener that some of you think it will, and it's also not going to draw in many of the core audience that will opt for Walk the Line. Just check out how virtually uneffected Monster-in-Law was by the behemoth known as Revenge of the Sith, and then get back to me about that counterprogramming argument.


Wow, I have overlooked that!

Willing another bet? Harry Potter will be a $90+ million opener! How can anyone even deny that? Lost a lot of steam? Sure...

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40530
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
$10,000 PTA isn't good enough? That's a lot more than Walk the Line will get opening weekend.


Well, we'll see, but put Walk the Line up against Harry Potter, and what do you expect?


Walk the Line's theatre count should be about 2000-2100 right?

2100 x 7000 PTA = 14.7 mil opening.

Will need a 7x multiplier over a boatload of other Oscar contenders. That'll be damn hard.

Ray had what, 3.5? And just realizing it now, when you said WTL had a better release date for Oscar season, you were shooting yourself in the foot. WTL has the better Oscar-set date, but Ray had the better b.o. release date. With late October it could open better, and have its weeks after the opening without as much competition. Walk the Line will be up against a extremely loaded holiday season this year, Jarhead and Munich and Family Stone and Memoirs and Brokeback and King Kong and Narnia, they won't achieve a 7 multiplier over that heap. And thats if they open that high. Nah...

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:51 pm
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
New prediction is almost ready, should have it posted sometime tonight.

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:52 pm
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40530
Post 
So I'm deciding to back off this thread for a while. I spent like 4 hours on it tonight, I should've been doing homework. :biggrin:

Most of my arguments have already been laid down too. So the only thing left is to sit back and let the chips roll...

:shades:

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:06 am
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Shack wrote:
Hmm? Panned? Or are you the one making up facts out of nowhere now?

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/great_balls_of_fire/

As a note...

You can't use Rotten Tomatoes for films older than 1998/1999ish, it gets massively unreliable before they started genuinely collecting reviews as they come, because it doesn't really represent a larger slice of the critic community and is more of an archive for certain critics who have taken the time to go back in and populate some of the older films.


Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:22 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 871 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 35  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.