Until someone comes along and covers tham with 8 feet of cement.

The problem with the animal/human debate is that people think that their dominion over the earth means that we are entitled to do what we want to whatever we want as long as it is not human. That is a very sick and disturing way of looking at things. I'm all for the consumption of animals for food if it is done somewhat humanely. But to bury something alive, no matter how superior you think you are, is about as barbaric and draconian as you can get, and it is wrong.

As long as that brings a Wal-Mart closer to me...sure.

And that is what is fundamentally wrong with most people, is statements like this.

Would it make it better if I said that I would rather shoot them and eat them and then build a Wal-Mart where they used to live?

Did Walmart bury some Democrats with backbone?

Yes.

Well that's fine by me as well. I just becaume cautious after I read Roid's article about poisonous turtles. Hmm.

I ate frog in the summer. 'twas good.

Killing something humanely is better than burying something alive.

Never suggested anything else.

Dude, how do you have 22,000 posts? That's like back in the mojo days.

Actually, now that you mention it...it's already more I guess you can say I've had some free time lately.