I prefer Wings to solo John Lennon.

No, I really do. While some of Wings' stuff sucked, so did some of John Lennon's, and overall, Paul had more good songs during that period than John did. (Then again, John also had about half as many albums during that period compared to Paul.)

Isn't this a popular opinion?

Bradley's posts all fit in this thread.

Moby Dick is poorly written

Beyoncé is just a hyped up Katy Perry or Rihanna level artist

The Walking Dead is deeper and far better directed than Game of Thrones

John Lennon's solo career is great and Paul McCartney's is a huge disappointment

That's a pretty popular opinion.

Her last few albums have had top level reviews and since she started playing up her blackness the liberal of police have started to treat her like a visionary, culminating in the outrage this weekend that Adele won best album over her

Ok, but reviewers are not most people. I think most people see her as a waste of space. The media is a different story since it can manipulate people to think a certain way, though I am not sure they all truly do think that way. But yeah, ok, either way she is still a successful recording artist which must count for something.

I'm not a big Beyonce fan, but the girl can at least hit notes right. I don't feel like it's fair to put her up with people who sound like goats that are being choked while they are "singing".

Both Katy Perry and Rihanna have better songs than Beyoncé. Beyoncé probably is a better singer though.

You are so gay.

Don't gays like Beyoncé?

Jeez don't put Beyoncé and Rihanna down on the same level as Katy Fucking Perry.

Wait, people don't like Katy Perry?

This is news to me. She's not the best live singer, but a lot of her songs are catchy.

Apparently not, since it was one of the examples given in the very first post of this thread. I was just responding to that.