Nov. U.S. death toll in Iraq nears record
Author |
Message |
Anonymous
|
lovemerox wrote: Krem wrote: lovemerox wrote: Since when is emotion a bad thing?
When your whole argument is based on emotion, it's a bad thing.  My whole argument based on emotion? People dying is an emotion? Well when a argument lacks "emotion" it seems a bit...cold hearted, as in you would do anything to justify the means. That shit happens so deal with it.
You're twisting my words. What I said was, that you used appeal to emotion in your argument (people dying is bad!), without thinking rationally about the whole thing.
I can use the same argument you provided (how would you tell a mother about her child dying in a car crash?) to make a case for outlawing cars.
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:19 pm |
|
 |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Krem wrote: lovemerox wrote: Krem wrote: lovemerox wrote: Since when is emotion a bad thing?
When your whole argument is based on emotion, it's a bad thing.  My whole argument based on emotion? People dying is an emotion? Well when a argument lacks "emotion" it seems a bit...cold hearted, as in you would do anything to justify the means. That shit happens so deal with it. You're twisting my words. What I said was, that you used appeal to emotion in your argument (people dying is bad!), without thinking rationally about the whole thing. I can use the same argument you provided (how would you tell a mother about her child dying in a car crash?) to make a case for outlawing cars.
Sorry for twisting, I misunderstood what you said.
you really think the outlawiing car theory can be equated with what were talking about?
p.s. I wanna ask you something about what we were tlaking about a week or so ago...about governments role...ect.. Should I do it here or PM you? 
_________________
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:21 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
lovemerox wrote: Sorry for twisting, I misunderstood what you said. you really think the outlawiing car theory can be equated with what were talking about?
If all you talk about is how bad it is for someone to die, then yes. You agree that some wars are justified; do the innocent people not die in those wars? Of course they do. lovemerox wrote: p.s. I wanna ask you something about what we were tlaking about a week or so ago...about governments role...ect.. Should I do it here or PM you? 
Better PM it to me.
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:37 pm |
|
 |
wertham
Wall-E
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:47 pm Posts: 863
|
Krem wrote: ANd here we go, yet another buzzword, Sudan. Did you know that Sudan has oil too? I guess Bush is so stupid, he must've overlooked that one.
Big deal. So does Canada... so I guess we'll never get rid of the asshole, now that he's on OUR turf and covets Hybernia. Once the Yanks show up at your door, they NEVER leave
No other country comes close to Iraq. The whole sordid mess is a make-work project for Halliburton, as everyone knows by now.
BTW: Ever since Saddam was "removed," it's been nothing but hard times for the Chrs in Iraq. (He was actually protecting them.)
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:42 pm |
|
 |
wertham
Wall-E
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:47 pm Posts: 863
|
Iraq Adopts Terror Alert System
BAGHDADâ€â€The Iraqi Department of Homeland Security recently released a 10-level, color-coded homeland security advisory system that will alert citizens to the risk of a terrorist attack within Iraq's borders. The country's current threat level is elevated, or Code Yellow-Orange. Citizens living in towns with populations of 1,500 or more should prepare for the smoke of burning vehicles to obscure the sun and expect hostages to be tortured for several days before being killed. Should the terror risk level rise to Code Orange-Yellow, it is likely that hostages will be left alive only long enough to dig their own graves.

_________________ (selah)
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:53 pm |
|
 |
wertham
Wall-E
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:47 pm Posts: 863
|
Krem wrote: Understand, that it doesn't matter to a mother whether her child died of cancer, car crash or a tank.
Congratulations, K. With that one dumb comment, you're our
GRAND PRIZE WINNER OF THE WEEK!
(It's in the mail...)
_________________ (selah)
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:01 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
wertham wrote: Krem wrote: ANd here we go, yet another buzzword, Sudan. Did you know that Sudan has oil too? I guess Bush is so stupid, he must've overlooked that one. Big deal. So does Canada... so I guess we'll never get rid of the asshole, now that he's on OUR turf and covets Hybernia. Once the Yanks show up at your door, they NEVER leave What's that? Backpedalling now? Let me repeat what you said: wertham wrote: The Bush League doesn't care about people. For them, it's all about the oil. ... If they really cared about people, they'd be doing the same damn "police action" in Sudan. But what doth it profiteth the Man? You're a truly great predictor. wertham wrote: No other country comes close to Iraq. The whole sordid mess is a make-work project for Halliburton, as everyone knows by now. Oh, yes yes. The same Halliburton that was receiving no-bid contracts in Kosovo from Clinton admin. But it was different back then, I am sure of that. wertham wrote: BTW: Ever since Saddam was "removed," it's been nothing but hard times for the Chrs in Iraq. (He was actually protecting them.)
Chrs?
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:29 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
wertham wrote: Krem wrote: Understand, that it doesn't matter to a mother whether her child died of cancer, car crash or a tank. Congratulations, K. With that one dumb comment, you're our GRAND PRIZE WINNER OF THE WEEK! (It's in the mail...)
When nothing else works, resort to insults, eh?
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:30 pm |
|
 |
Citizen Klown
Speed Racer
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:56 pm Posts: 140 Location: Not at BOM
|
 Question
If Saddam was still in Power how many people would be dead? How many did he kill annually?
Would this be more acceptable numbers?
_________________ Signature goes here
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 11:44 pm |
|
 |
Coasterman2002
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 6:23 pm Posts: 1010 Location: New Yawk
|
 Re: Question
Citizen Klown wrote: If Saddam was still in Power how many people would be dead? How many did he kill annually?
Would this be more acceptable numbers?
its the fact of waht saddam has done in the past...for example, what the preists did in the catholic church was maybe 30 years ago but they still got punished for it just as well as Saddam should. He may not be a threat now but he deserved to punished. As one poster said before. What comes around goes around...
_________________ Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation" On Radio Monday through Friday 8pm-11pm (Eastern Time)
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder - BUY THE BOOK NOW!!! On New York Times Best Seller List 9 Weeks in a Row
|
Wed Dec 01, 2004 12:01 am |
|
 |
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm Posts: 8687
|
wooooohhh this thread started off very hippily.
|
Wed Dec 01, 2004 12:48 am |
|
 |
Terminator1997
George A. Romero
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:30 pm Posts: 9773 Location: Enjoying a cold pint
|
rusty wrote: wooooohhh this thread started off very hippily.
hippies are the spawns of satan :evil:  :evil: 
|
Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:24 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|