yes. . . . . . . .







:laugh:

Even if it's not nude, it's the next thing to it, and that's still not respectable like you seem to think it is.

And in the three pictures that baba posted she's not wearing a top.

one pic .. shes nude .. theres no other way to define it.

I'd pose nude for a quarter and a stick of bubblegum. People have too many scruples these days.

Yes she's topless, just about every female actress has posed topless with her arms over her breasts, I see no niple, all of those pictures would be fine a magazine cover.

Has hs eposed topless yes, nude no, no nipple = not nude.

*checks pockets*

Anyone got a stick of gum?

sorry.

She has posed nude ... nude means not having clothes on. Has she shown the goods? no.


and i don't care .. i'm just trying to prove imtim wrong so he may cry in some corner somewhere.














IMTIM83 for president

AND a quarter.

I won't except that fruity British money, either! A schilling, pence, or whatever you people call it. I do have some boundaries.

I have a pittance... is that enough?

*cough* *hack* *cough*

Agreed.

These may be definable as nude, but in reality ... she isn't. Her arms serve the purpose of clothing, it was never the intention for you to see anything, thus it is not nude or topless.

Alba never has done nude scenes in a movie, I now officially hate Rodriguez for not at least making her go topless. She is deffinatly the type of girl who WOULD do it if her career fell into the shits. So I will officially boycott her movies until she goes topless.

Nah, I don't like German money either.

nude = no clothes, she was wearing underwear, she posed topless, covered toples which is different then uncovered topless, you see nothing in the photos you woudl nto see on every beach in the US. Say9ing someone posed nude is completely ambigious at this point.

Clearly she was willing to go nude for Sin City if required, but I understand her reservatiosn in going uncovered nude, for the first of your life peopel ahve pictures of your nipples. The pictures in GQ are stnaddard fair at this point for actress in hollywood. Its not a playboy nude is the standadrd stuff/GQ/Maxim covered nude photos that every female takes. I am not batting an eyeless.

On nudity in film I also liked the following Rosie Perez comment, she said, "I don't believe in body doubles, that is saying I won't get nude but its ok for the bitch down the street."

shes not wearing underwear in that last pic .. thats the one i'm talking about.

Yes I am so sorry. Your missin the peice of string that would be wraping around.

It is no different than putting her arm over her breast. It may be defined as nude, but simply, it is not. They are selective shots, designed to show you nothing you wouldnt see if she was fully clothed in a bathing suit.

Define it as topless or nude if you want, but she isnt either.

no .. hands are not clothes. Sorry you are wrong . sorry goodbye.

Dont worry,they all go nude when their careers go to shit and soon her career will go to shit.

Haha! That's a good one; "why" Oh man, that is priceless...wait, you mean you're not kidding? You don't want to see one of the hottest women alive naked?

*slaps intim83 in the face*

No I do not want to see Jessica Alba naked, as my girlfriend, or anything. If she asked me I would say no.

queerboy.

lol I am non sexural.

I don't like anything.

androgenousboy

lol

not even in my dreams? [-X that will not do. :wink:
eventually when her star fades she'll turn to the darkside like all the others.

No she won't.

Besides no one wants to see Jessica Alba nude anyway.