Oh definitely, I met a guy a few months ago and he had slept with about 25 women in 5 years, and it gave me pause. When you meet someone and they go through woemn that quickly you cannot help but feel like you are just the next notch on the belt. I opted not to be notch 26 nd instead we are friends.

Not to mention the fact they may have like 9 STD's

Personally, I would rather date someone who wasnt THAT sexually active. IM not saying they have to be a virgin, just countless men is just....not my style

I think it depends on if you are into casual sex or not. I am not a "fuck and run" kind of girl, my relationships tend towards the serious kind. As I said before I've been having sex since I was 15, and I am nearly 25, and I've only had 4 partners.

There is that great line in Clueless where the main character Cher is talking about being avirgin and she says, "I'm picky about shoes and those only go on my feet."

@ clueless


Im the same way ripper. I tend to want more serious relationships, and in turn have sex be something intimate..."special" as cliche as that sounds...

I had casual sex once, honestly the sex wasn;t very good, and it was emotionless and the guy pretty mcuh sucked. I am not to interested in doing that in the future.

yeah
IM not saying its bad all the time...or "bad" in general....Dont think Im tryin to say your bad!


YOU ARE THE ULTIMATE RIPPER!!! :wink:

I know, I;m just saying my past experience tells me I am not the casual sex type. I tend to find it unfulfilling. But hey sometimes a person has needs.

Ultimately I jsut htink its important to be safe, I have some friends who sleep around alot, and I just like to make sure they are being careful.

That's what I like to hear :wink:

Good point, there so much shit flying around these days, I think monogomous relationships are the best...unless you like to have various decorations on your genital area...

I had a very in depth sex ed class in the 9th grade, which was really good because I think alot of people don't actually udnerstand the various STD's and how you cantract them, symptoms, ramifications, etc. In my high school in both Bio and BIO II, sex ed was part of the class, in Bio I it was all about STD"S, in BIO II we discussed the biology fo sex, how orgams work, etc.
I also took human sexuality in college.

My high school didnt offer anything like that. I think its great though...a good way to get young people aware of the consequences of unprotected sex.

I think the detial with which we discussed sex was technically against the rules, but both BIO teachers felt very strongly that we shoudl discuss it, and no one ever complained.

Against the rules? How can talking about sex be against the rules?

I was a virgin when I got married and it's not because of lack of opportunity. It was because of what Christianity teaches. It was very important to my wife and me. I know that's shocking to many, but it's the truth.

That's cool man, everyone has their reasons!! :wink:

Was it worth the wait?

Absolutely! I wouldn't change a thing!

Cool

So do you think pre-marital sex is a sin?

Honestly, I do think it's sin. However, sin can be forgiven. And I am not saying that to condemn anyone. Jesus did say 'Let him who is without sin cast the first stone'. And the context of that passage does have to do with sex outside marriage....adultery specifically.

I understand, but how does that passage have anything to do with sex before marriage?

That passage has nothing to do with sex before marriage. My point was Jesus didn't condemn the person caught in sin. He forgave her. But Jesus did say not to sin anymore. I am not sure I want to get in a scriptural debate here. That wasn't my intention.

Oh, gotcha...I just misunderstood what you were saying. Sorry

No problem. I appreciate your questions. Thanks!

Anytime :wink: I just didn't want you to think that I was "bashing" you because I wasn't...

Understood. And I didn't want you to think I was trying to be self-righteous.

I was 12

I was preteen.
It was a sock

It was inevitable.