Author |
Message |
Terminator1997
George A. Romero
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:30 pm Posts: 9773 Location: Enjoying a cold pint
|
 that pic is hilarious
|
Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:28 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Best thread title ever!
|
Sun Mar 06, 2005 11:19 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
insomniacdude wrote: What's with her face? Her face and neck are fairly tan, than there is a magical line where the skin is much lighter.
I smell fraud, or a weird tanning job.
Yep it doesn't seem real to me either, and given that it's not from a reputable website....like I said in my first post it just looks freaky, bizarre. It doesn't look like Britney, more like some middle aged hairdresser from Reno. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
|
Sun Mar 06, 2005 11:38 pm |
|
 |
Terminator1997
George A. Romero
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:30 pm Posts: 9773 Location: Enjoying a cold pint
|
Archie Gates wrote: insomniacdude wrote: What's with her face? Her face and neck are fairly tan, than there is a magical line where the skin is much lighter.
I smell fraud, or a weird tanning job. Yep it doesn't seem real to me either, and given that it's not from a reputable website....like I said in my first post it just looks freaky, bizarre. It doesn't look like Britney, more like some middle aged hairdresser from Reno. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
the boobs look suspiciously small too 
|
Sun Mar 06, 2005 11:41 pm |
|
 |
jenniferofthejungle
Star Trek XI
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:44 am Posts: 341
|
|
Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:06 am |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
She must have told her makeup artist:
I want to look ugly
|
Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:22 am |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11028
|
Archie Gates wrote: insomniacdude wrote: What's with her face? Her face and neck are fairly tan, than there is a magical line where the skin is much lighter.
I smell fraud, or a weird tanning job. Yep it doesn't seem real to me either, and given that it's not from a reputable website....like I said in my first post it just looks freaky, bizarre. It doesn't look like Britney, more like some middle aged hairdresser from Reno. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Its a real pic.
|
Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:11 am |
|
 |
Kris K
Horror Hound
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:44 pm Posts: 6228
|
Love britney.....everyone gets caught in bad times.
Plus the reporters who slag her off for looking "trashy" are NEVER male.
Always jealous bints.
IE.: THE SUN's (Uks biggest paper) Victoria Newton, who slags britney every day...she's an ugly boot, and we can see why she slags her off. Pure jealousy.
Go Britney!
|
Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:44 am |
|
 |
xXVincentxX
La Bella Vito
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 9146
|
I don't mean to offend anyone, but she looks terrible on that picture. Too much makeup, and she looks fake like a manikin.
|
Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:02 pm |
|
 |
jenniferofthejungle
Star Trek XI
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:44 am Posts: 341
|
PinkPanther wrote: I don't mean to offend anyone, but she looks terrible on that picture. Too much makeup, and she looks fake like a manikin.
I also think that we get so used to them looking perfect in videos and in magazine that when we see them looking ordinary it's a total shock.
|
Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:09 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32579 Location: the last free city
|
thank god for makeup

_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 2:09 am |
|
 |
Korrgan
problem?
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am Posts: 15515 Location: Bait Shop
|
I actually think she looks good in the Hawaii pic, but God is she ugly in the other. She looks bad in all the others.
_________________
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:15 am |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
I dont think she looks bad at all in any of them
The girls sizzlin, obviously makeup helps
But why do people act like chicks have the plague when they dont have makeup on
That said Jennifer Garner [goddess] rarely wears makeup and she looks pretty much the same as she does with it.
But Britney just has teenage skin.
The only reason you see so many images of her looking stripped down is because the medias trying desperately to tear the worlds most powerful celeb down; theyve been at it since 2003 and shes still selling shitloads of CDs, they seem to be laying off now though...
But god knows britney knows how to make herself look worse than she should - she goes out in sloppy clothes with her hair up in this horrible, tacky arrangement and wears huge sunglasses that accentuate her nose and bottom of her face
If you see images of her in the streets from 2002/2003 she looks REALLY hot without too much/any makeup, her hairs down and straigthened and she wears fashionable clothes
But i think her lack of regard for the media and what people think of her is pretty brave for an artist considered to be all about her image.
Oh and Masonmyers- remember when Britney nearly sued Victoria Newton for like slagging her off for drinking in the morning when she was actually taking some supplement, then the bitch printed an apology before not printing anything on britney for like 5 weeks.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 2:33 pm |
|
 |
Kris K
Horror Hound
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:44 pm Posts: 6228
|
Yeah, Victoria Newton is a skank ass whore. and i hope britney threatens to sue her again.
She's a real DICK.
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 2:44 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
she sure isnt a nice person, ill say that much
_________________ I'm out.
|
Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:11 pm |
|
|