Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:04 am



Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
 Die Hard 2 

What grade would you give this film?
A 22%  22%  [ 4 ]
B 50%  50%  [ 9 ]
C 17%  17%  [ 3 ]
D 11%  11%  [ 2 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 18

 Die Hard 2 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Die Hard 2
Die Hard 2

Image

Quote:
Die Hard 2 (sometimes colloquially referred to as Die Hard 2: Die Harder) is a 1990 action film and the second in the Die Hard film series. The film was directed by Renny Harlin, and stars Bruce Willis as John McClane. The film co-stars Bonnie Bedelia (reprising her role as Holly McClane), William Sadler, Art Evans, William Atherton reprising his role as Richard (Dick) Thornburg, Franco Nero, Dennis Franz, Fred Thompson, John Amos, and Reginald VelJohnson, who makes a cameo appearance reprising his role as Sgt. Al Powell from the first film.

The screenplay was written by Steven E. de Souza and Doug Richardson, adapted from the novel 58 Minutes by Walter Wager. The novel has the same premise but differs slightly: A cop must stop terrorists who take an airport hostage while his wife's plane circles overhead. He has 58 minutes to do so before the plane crashes. Roderick Thorp, who wrote the novel Nothing Lasts Forever, upon which the first Die Hard film was based, receives credit for creating "certain original characters", although his name is misspelled onscreen as "Roderick Thorpe."

As with the first film, the action in Die Hard 2 takes place on Christmas Eve. McClane is waiting for his wife to land at Washington Dulles International Airport when terrorists take over the air traffic control system. He must stop the terrorists before his wife's plane and several other incoming flights that are circling the airport run out of fuel and crash. During the night, McClane must also contend with airport police, maintenance workers, and a military commander who does not want his assistance.

The film was followed by Die Hard with a Vengeance in 1995 and Live Free or Die Hard in 2007.


Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:59 pm
Profile
We had our time together
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 13270
Location: Vienna
Post 
Weakest Die Hard movie. Still very entertaining with some great action. A-/B+


Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:07 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67035
Post 
Die Hard 2: Die Harder - B+

Very good action. The worst one of the trilogy, but still a brilliant film. Renny Harlin is a good director.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:13 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
B+


I am in agreeement with the previous posters in this thread. Die Hard 2 is the worst of the Die Hard films. Which still doesn't mean it's bad. It's very entertaining, Bruce is as good as always. Unfortunately the showdown was a bit lame...

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:23 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Just watched it again tonight after quite a while, and yeah, it's the weakest of the series, but it's still damn entertaining and a great, great action flick. A-


Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:27 am
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21634
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
It was more of a rehash of the first in a new setting, with crazy Harlin as the director, but its still a fun film to watch, and still shows why Die Hard is one of the best action series. Its a letdown of the other two for sure, but still has a decent twist and good action. B+

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:53 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:57 am
Posts: 4669
Location: Anchorage, AK
Post 
I havent seen the other two, but I thought this was an awsome film, very entertaining, and it had some sweet action

A-

_________________
My Most anticipated films of 2015


Image


Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:54 am
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13400
Post 
Being Harlin helmed this was always going to be the black sheep of the Die Hard family but it still measures up well. Willis is in the form of his life and for me the plane exploding climax is very satisfying.

A


Sat Oct 07, 2006 3:42 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
A huge dip down in quality from the first one. It's so obviously trying to repeat the success of it, so much so that it mimics practically everything about it. Problem is, it's all terribly done and feels incredibly forced. Willis' one-liners are groan-worthy here, and unfortunately scripted - the ad-libbing was what made the first one great. The acting is pretty bad across the board, as none of the cast seemed to be taking the movie seriously; the story is pretty terrible, which would account for that. The action scenes are thrilling, but so over-the-top ridiculous (like the ejector seat bit) that it renders them silly. There's a line between unrealistic and ridiculous, and this film doesn't even bother to look back. It's truly painful to watch at times.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:28 pm
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post 
solid movie but nothing amazing. Weakest of the series.

B


Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:09 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 3350
Post 
C+
Entertaining but just a money follow up, not worth anything or memorable, and the plot was weak, very weak. The first movie is one of my all time favs, so.. I still have to see the 3rd.


Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:02 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
A fundamentally flawed scheme from the terrorists, McClane becoming the untouchable action hero he was spoofing in the first film, the stupid subplot and too many side characters... Yup, it's just like you'd expect from a sequel. Rubbish, especially compared to the first film.


Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:19 am
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
Quite entertaining, but easily the worst of the four. This one feels a lot more like a cash-in than any of the other installments, and things just don't work as well this time around. The script is mediocre, the comedy/one-liners feel forced, and the performances aren't even anything special. A big step down in quality from the first film, although in terms of action it definitely scores.

B


Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:48 am
Profile YIM
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37974
Post 
I always laugh at the subtitle of this film. Is "Die Harder" really the best they could come up with? It sounds like something from an 8 year old's vocabulary.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:59 am
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Die Hard 2: Die Harder
It's not as well-scripted or well-directed as the brilliant first.

Yet, I often think I like this one best. Glorious fun.

As for "Die Harder," it is the perfect subtitle. That's the level of in-on-the-joke absurdity we're dealing with here.

_________________
k


Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:39 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
Post Re: Die Hard 2
I was sure I reviewed this last year but anyway what it should have read then: Pretty good action flick, very entertaining B+

Just rewatched it and does it NOT hold up. I have finally decided or found that any scene depicting any villain with any weapon that is 100% assured of killing the protagonist/hero and who does not because of a sudden case of stupidity is terrible, terrible writing. Once upon a time the old "It's a popcorn flick/it's meant to be fun/unrealistic/Take a chill pill/Relax/etc." form of an excuse would work but, after seeing this same scenario depicted in Die Hard 1 and 2 multiple times, I must say, fuck off.

It's one thing to delay to kill the person who has continued to meddle in your plans because you may need them later on, or if you have a believable pause, BUT WHY would anyone decide NOT to kill them when they have no purpose or pause like amnesia before carrying out their plan is beyond me. It's shit writing.

Die Hard- Both Karl (whose brother was killed) and Hans do this after all the shit Bruce Willis put them through. The rest of the flick was pretty enjoyable but the ending's just WTF.

Die Hard 2- Goes downhill when Willis is allowed to survive on the conveyor floor and obviously using the machine to bring his gun toward him and the villain, instead of shooting him with his freaking machine gun, decides to try and jump to reach Willis' gun. Other examples are a plane full of Marines being unable to take out Willis without hitting the plane and machine gun fire destroying the entire cockpit but never once grazing Willis who proceeds to escape with an ejector seat when 8 grenades fail to go off, and in yet another example, two Marines shooting straight on at Willis manage to not even destroy the glass on his snowmobile.

In lesser words, the writing is some cockshit.

_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m


Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:42 am
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67035
Post 
Die Hard 2: Die Harder

Well, I have to disagree with my 2005-self because I watched Die Hard 2 last night and it wasn't what I remembered at all. Harlin basically strips it of any of the charisma that the first movie had. The comedy is all but gone with pointlessly, plot-holed villains and not-too-entertaining action. Bruce does a good job, but if I were to recommend any of the Die Hard's it would be the McTiernan ones.

There are good scenes in this, and a few good lines, but overall it just felt like a rushed idea.

B

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:05 am
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67035
Post Re: Die Hard 2
BK wrote:
I was sure I reviewed this last year but anyway what it should have read then: Pretty good action flick, very entertaining B+

Just rewatched it and does it NOT hold up. I have finally decided or found that any scene depicting any villain with any weapon that is 100% assured of killing the protagonist/hero and who does not because of a sudden case of stupidity is terrible, terrible writing. Once upon a time the old "It's a popcorn flick/it's meant to be fun/unrealistic/Take a chill pill/Relax/etc." form of an excuse would work but, after seeing this same scenario depicted in Die Hard 2 multiple times, I must say, fuck off.

It's one thing to delay to kill the person who has continued to meddle in your plans because you may need them later on, or if you have a believable pause, BUT WHY would anyone decide NOT to kill them when they have no purpose or pause like amnesia before carrying out their plan is beyond me. It's shit writing.

Die Hard 2- Goes downhill when Willis is allowed to survive on the conveyor floor and obviously using the machine to bring his gun toward him and the villain, instead of shooting him with his freaking machine gun, decides to try and jump to reach Willis' gun. Other examples are a plane full of Marines being unable to take out Willis without hitting the plane and machine gun fire destroying the entire cockpit but never once grazing Willis who proceeds to escape with an ejector seat when 8 grenades fail to go off, and in yet another example, two Marines shooting straight on at Willis manage to not even destroy the glass on his snowmobile.

In lesser words, the writing is some cockshit.


True.

But I can't agree with that in terms of Die Hard, only Die Hard 2. The enemy not killing the hero when he has a clear shot happens all too often in action movies. I don't mind accepting a certain level of ridiculousness with these scenes, but the escalator one and the cockpit one in Die Hard 2 is laughable. Plus, at the end, on the wing, why not just shoot Willis after they realise he is out there. Why does the General need to go out too? Surely he'd just send some henchman out there instead to remove the jacket and then shoot Willis from the safety of the plane.

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:16 am
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67035
Post 
Oh, and the ending pissed me off with the fat Italian cop all of sudden, after the entire film being a total wanker to McClane, being the nicest guy on the planet. How would he have seen any of what McClane did for one, but secondly, why would he change so drastically. Was it Meissner from Lock Up telling him to shut the fuck up? Seems a bit weak.

And the fat Italian cops brother being that other fat Italian at the beginning....also narked me off.

I sound like I hate this film, but I really don't. I'm just a tad pissed off that it wasn't as great as how I remembered it.

Die Hard A+
Die Hard 2: Die Harder B-
Die Hard with a Vengeance A
Live Free or Die Hard B-
A Good Day to Die Hard B-

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Mar 23, 2013 7:08 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post Re:
Thegun wrote:
It was more of a rehash of the first in a new setting...

This.

Though it was always worth it top me for this one scene (starting @ 2:22)...





Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:12 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36923
Post Re: Die Hard 2
It tries to use the formula of the first one but is unsuccessful because it gets too convoluted trying to be clever and the finale ends with a thud. The action is fine, Willis is great here as well but the surrounding and at times repetitive story is the biggest flaw here. A big step-down from the original but that would never be matched.

B


Tue Sep 29, 2020 11:56 pm
Profile
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 8942
Location: Houston, Texas
Post Re: Die Hard 2
This sequel is kind of underrated IMO. Yeah its not as good as the first movie or Vengeance, but I still find it to be a pretty damn good 90's action flick with Willis still being a badass and William Saddler being a more than formidable villain, although not as memorable as any of the Gruber brothers. I also love the airport/siege setting and the twist with John Amos and his team did get me back in the day even if you could probably guess it now early on.

B


Wed Sep 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 22 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.