Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 11:30 pm



Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 I'm Not There 

What grade would you give this film?
A 40%  40%  [ 4 ]
B 10%  10%  [ 1 ]
C 40%  40%  [ 4 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 10%  10%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 10

 I'm Not There 
Author Message
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post I'm Not There
I'm Not There

Image

Quote:
I'm Not There is a 2007 biographical musical film directed by Todd Haynes, inspired by iconic American singer-songwriter Bob Dylan. Six actors depict different facets of Dylan's life and public persona: Christian Bale, Cate Blanchett, Marcus Carl Franklin, Richard Gere, Heath Ledger, and Ben Whishaw. At the start of the film, a caption reads: "Inspired by the music and the many lives of Bob Dylan". Besides song credits, this is the only time Dylan's name appears in the film.

The film tells its story using non-traditional narrative techniques, intercutting the storylines of the six different Dylan-inspired characters. The title of the film is taken from the 1967 Dylan Basement Tape recording, "I'm Not There", a song that had not been officially released until it appeared on the film's soundtrack album. The film received a generally favorable response, and appeared on several top ten film lists for 2007, topping the lists for The Village Voice, Entertainment Weekly, Salon and The Boston Globe. Particular praise went to Cate Blanchett for her performance, culminating in a Volpi Cup from the Venice Film Festival, the Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress, along with an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress nomination.

The film was released two months prior to the death of the actor Heath Ledger, and was one of his last films.

_________________
---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--


Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:27 am
Profile WWW
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post Re: I'm Not There
Early thought, upon leaving theater: "This will be the best film of the decade." I'm inclined to hyperbole, especially right after watching a movie in theaters, but I don't know whether that's the case here.

Here's a quick copypaste of some thots.
Spoiler: show
Some background, for the unfamiliar. The movie is about Bob Dylan. It uses 6 different actors to portray these different sections of his life...the young wanna-be, the gospel singer, the protest singer, the electric guitar, the old-hermit type, and some other things including an actor who plays one of the Dylans in a biopic and a strange interrogation. Acting as Dylan are Marcus Carl Franklin, Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Richard Gere, Ben Winshaw and Cate Blanchett.

So it's this unconventional biopic about this unconventional man, and it's pretty easily the most evocative, exhilarating, powerful and fascinating biographical film I've ever seen. Todd Haynes takes just about everything, period, and either uses it to make the film, or explores it in the film. Everything from documentary and fiction and verite and avant garde; stark black-and-whites and beautiful era-appropriate colors; voice over, surrealism, film noir, westerns, European art-cinema, (including lots of Godard ), conventional biopic staples and pretty much any other style imaginable. All of this and more, comes together to form probably the most aesthetically pleasing and technically interesting film of this, or most years.

It's about fame and vanity, politics and society and government and war, philosophy and thoughts. Love and death and hate and lies and truth. Poetry and music and art and nature and drugs. There are moments (however fleeting they may be) that touch on pretty much every subject and emotion you could possibly want.

And throughout it all, it manages to paint a lovingly celebratory portrait of this amazing guy. I feel like I know more factually, and empathize more with Dylan after this film than I do with any other 'celebrity' figure I'm familiar with. All the facts you "need to know" are still present, they're just wrapped up in all this wonderful technique and content. You get a complete overview of a particular man and, as a bonus, this wonderful enigmatic legend, the "essence" of Dylan, if you like. Both views work alone, in contrast and hand in hand, depending on how you look at it.

Much has/will be said about the acting, particularly Cate Blanchett's turn. Good. It's all great. I loved Marcus Carl Franklin, the little kid who plays "Woody". He truly sells this juxtaposition of child-playing-adult and true, aged profundity. Cate Blanchett's Dylan is as good as they say. She's feminine, but you don't really think "That's a girl," and you certainly don't think "That's Cate Blanchett." She's just completely overwhelmed by and lost in this character, and it's truly remarkable to watch. Ledger's and Bale's versions don't really stand out, but they're good. Gere's story was probably my favorite part, especially during the Halloween town-meeting thing. The other guy, Ben Winshaw, is really really good, and might get the best lines to deliver, but his character never gets to do more than sit and talk.

Anyway, I don't even know what all that says now, but I'm hoping it says "I'm Not There is amazing. Go see it." Because ultimately, you really do have to see it for yourself.


Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:36 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post Re: I'm Not There
I don't think this film will do a lot for non-fans/those without any extensive knowledge of Dylan's life. It certainly didn't for me.

I liked the approach; I think the experimental nature of it deserves some credit. But I ultimately found it to be a pretentious, annoying, inaccessible mess. Incidentally, kind of like - as I learned from the film - Dylan himself.

I knew little going in of his life. Just some of the basics. And coming out I had absolutely no desire to investigate further.

It was a bit maddening, to be quite honest.

I can understand that fans and older folks will be coming at this from an entirely different angle, but it didn't work for me.

C/C-


Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:03 am
Profile WWW
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post Re: I'm Not There
An unbelievably dull, pretentious and annoying mess of a film. Some segments of it work, but others drag it down a great deal. The best bits come from the subplot involving Heath Ledger, which I actually enjoyed a lot. I was captivated by his strong performance and really liked the character dynamics that were set in place. Cate Blanchett's subplot was also decent and her performance was fantastic - despite the fact that her character was massively annoying. But the Richard Gere subplot was quite possibly one of the worst things I've ever seen in any motion picture so far this year. It was unspeakably stupid and boring. There was absolutely nothing about it that I enjoyed. Marcus Carl Franklin was good but didn't get enough screentime, and Christian Bale and Ben Whishaw are wasted and fail to make an impression. Michelle Williams and Julianne Moore are also wasted in small, thankless supporting roles. The direction is choppy and can't seem to settle on a particular style, switching between genres constantly without being effective. It was also way overlong. I couldn't wait for this movie to end and was squirming in my seat by the time the multiple climaxes arrived. And for trying to hard to veer away from being a conventional biopic, Haynes has certainly utilized many of the genre's most prevalent cliches. Granted, I knew absolutely nothing about Bob Dylan's life before seeing this film, but after seeing it I have no interest in learning anything else about it either. C-


Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:16 am
Profile YIM
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post Re: I'm Not There
Thanks loyal. I was beginning to worry about this place.


Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:19 am
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post Re: I'm Not There
Robbie Clark and Claire's storyline was the best thing in the movie.


Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:32 am
Profile YIM
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37995
Post Re: I'm Not There
I'm on the kypade(great review by the way) and loyal side of the fence... 5/5, one of the best movies of the year.

What I never expected from this movie was to be so moved. There's something majestic about Woody and Gere riding the train, or the Ballad of a Thin Man sequence, or the montage of Robbie and Claire's beginnings, or other countless scenes in the movie. Dylan's songs give this film soul, they give it life. Because the scenes on screen and the music represent and intertwine with each other so well, everytime one of his songs started playing I was simply swept off my feet. Hell, the music is so good that even if the movie wasn't great, it'd be watchable just for 2 hours of listening to Dylan songs.

It's probably the best directed and visually enticing movie of the year, no surprise there. I loved how even with Haynes' great techniques, it never distracts from what is happening on screen and the movies' series of events never slows down. The alternation of the black and white works pretty perfectly and I never doubted the surroundings of any of these characters.

The acting is brilliant. Again, maybe the best of any movie this year. You can't say enough about Blanchett here. The Jude scenes were probably my favorite of any movie this year. There's a world of difference between this and something like Travolta earlier this year. I FORGOT a female or any actor at all was playing this character. She absolutely become trippy Quinn. Even if the transgender thing wasn't there, it'd be one of the year's best performances. I also loved the Michelle Williams contribution to that segment by the way. The scene where he's following her in front of the forest, fantastic.

But everyone else is great as well... Ledger and his girl, the little kid, Gere, Winshaw. Even Bale who I was a little skeptical at first for being the only character trying to imitate Dylan's speech and stature, eventually won my over with his pretty awesome jewfro church singing.

It's really a movie I recommend everyone checks out. I loved every second, but it's watchable besides that just for the filmmaking, acting, and songs alone.

(Btw, if anyone's worried about Dk and cory's reactions from not knowing anything about Dylan, Martin Scorsese's No Direction Home is a pretty great doc that can fill in the blanks before. Honestly before those reviews I wouldn't have thought it'd make a difference whether you're caught up or not, but anyways. It's a pretty interesting and valuable watch regardless.)

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:53 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post Re: I'm Not There
I don't know, but this is the only Oscar contender so far this year that I've really, really disliked. :(


Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:07 am
Profile YIM
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: I'm Not There
Dkmuto wrote:
I don't think this film will do a lot for non-fans/those without any extensive knowledge of Dylan's life. It certainly didn't for me.

I liked the approach; I think the experimental nature of it deserves some credit. But I ultimately found it to be a pretentious, annoying, inaccessible mess. Incidentally, kind of like - as I learned from the film - Dylan himself.

I knew little going in of his life. Just some of the basics. And coming out I had absolutely no desire to investigate further.

It was a bit maddening, to be quite honest.

I can understand that fans and older folks will be coming at this from an entirely different angle, but it didn't work for me.

C/C-


I also had woefully little knowledge about Bob Dylan and more importantly 60s art cinema, but I was completely swept away by the sheer visceral thrill of this. Cinematically it's a real treat, and while I don't disagree it was a bit too long, I thought it was one of the best films of a truly wonderful year.


Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:57 am
Profile
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post Re: I'm Not There
Put me down as another Dylan virgin absolutely swept away by this. It truly is a uniquely cinematic and captivating film, with sheer confidence in its blending of styles and moods, and with nary a dull moment. Blanchett is excellent, and her scenes are almost never less than fun, but like Loyal I found the Woody and Robbie Clark/Clare sections of the film to be most rewarding. Still, it's all quite excellent, and definitely one of the best of the year that improves every moment I think about it. Loved it.

****


Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:01 am
Profile WWW
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37995
Post Re: I'm Not There
Bump for the dvd release... watch it

Definitley waiting for the "fine art" reviewers to catch up to this (yosh, makeshift, trix, etc.)

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed May 07, 2008 12:27 pm
Profile
ef star star kay
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:45 pm
Posts: 3016
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Post Re: I'm Not There
I think I've seen makeshift's grade for this movie somewhere..

and he loved it..

as for me (I know I'm not in your waiting list, Shack)

I'm with thompsoncory..

C+

_________________
Image


Wed May 07, 2008 2:39 pm
Profile
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post Re: I'm Not There
Shack wrote:
Bump for the dvd release... watch it

Definitley waiting for the "fine art" reviewers to catch up to this (yosh, makeshift, trix, etc.)


Yeah, compared to them, we're just porno. :lol:

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Wed May 07, 2008 3:00 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post Re: I'm Not There
Shack wrote:
Bump for the dvd release... watch it

Definitley waiting for the "fine art" reviewers to catch up to this (yosh, makeshift, trix, etc.)


:hahaha:

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Wed May 07, 2008 4:44 pm
Profile WWW
Teenage Dream

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
Post Re: I'm Not There
Yeah, I still haven't seen this. How about that.


Wed May 07, 2008 4:50 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: I'm Not There
I'm pretty fine, if I do say so myself.

I'll probably wait til I get back to rent this.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Wed May 07, 2008 5:38 pm
Profile
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post Re: I'm Not There
Is the dvd any good? Anything interesting on it? I guess I could just google this, huh. I wanna buy it.


Wed May 07, 2008 5:59 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post Re: I'm Not There
Bleh, I still can't over the atrociousness of the Richard Gere segment :grrr:


Thu May 08, 2008 2:33 am
Profile YIM
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37995
Post Re: I'm Not There
Not 1 person has seen this since the dvd release?

come on people. Don't fear the arty.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon May 19, 2008 9:41 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post Re: I'm Not There
Why do you assume that those who don't watch this film are afraid of the 'arty', whatever that is?

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Mon May 19, 2008 9:46 pm
Profile WWW
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37995
Post Re: I'm Not There
I wasn't very serious... just playing with an expression... you know

:ninja:

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon May 19, 2008 10:53 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post Re: I'm Not There
Very well then *retreats* :ninja:

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Mon May 19, 2008 11:25 pm
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 2:23 pm
Posts: 1778
Location: Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
Post Re: I'm Not There
That kid should've been up for a few awards last year! What an incredible performance.

I'm still torn as to what my feelins for the movie are, but I have seen it twice and can honestly say that I liked it.

Blanchett, Bale, and the guy being interviewed all gave great performances.

_________________
Image


Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:42 am
Profile WWW
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: I'm Not There
Best film of 2007?

Maybe.


Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:59 pm
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: I'm Not There
Finally watched it, Shack...

...and I quite loved it. I'm in the same boat as Jon in that I knew very little about Dylan or his music going in, and while the film didn't necessarily answer all my questions, it intrigued me and moved me enough to make me want to find out more on my own. The non-narrative structure didn't bother me at all; instead, the meshing of six different storylines, each with their own distinctive visual style, painted a vivid portrait of Dylan that a conventional biopic simply wouldn't be able to. I'm not sure which section or performance was my favourite - Blanchett's is surely the centerpiece and also the most fun, but I also really dug Gere's with the surreal Halloween village - but there's no doubt that they all complement each other perfectly. Add into this the way Dylan's songs are integrated into and even portrayed throughout the film, as well as some beautiful cinematic allusions, and this is certainly one of the best films from last year. What a year that was.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:10 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.