Catwoman





Utter garbage. :razz:

D+

The costume is ridiculous to start with, the acting is bizarre at best (Berry and Stone deliver a one-two punch that is too bad to even be considered campy) and Pitof is maybe the most untalented director ever. His Vidocq was already a shame but this one is even worse. It doesn't play like a movie but a collage of endless MTV videos one after another. The basketball scene was the worst scene I have seen in years. And what about these ridiculous visual effects? Those endless cgi camera moves through the skycrapers of Lake City were so annoying. And there is not one well made action scene in it. What a catastrophy (pun intended) F

Zing, since when does "utter garbage" get a D+ :razz:

--

Catwoman - B-

Good fun. Halle is damn sexy. The story is silly. The costume is fine. The script isnt too good, but who cares.

A train wreck of a film. Terrible from start to finish. One of the worst of 2004.

D+

Remind me again how a "Train wreckage" would get a D+?

What do you mean? Shall I list how terrible it was? It was a disaster. A mess from the beginning. And it got worse. By the end, one had to marvel at the sheer audacity of a studio to release this Cataclyismic disaster (pun intened). With a visual style that was more like a music video cum video game it was easily one of the worst of 2004. Rates as a 3.4/10 or a D+

It's garbage. It's not the worst film I've ever seen. If it was, it would be an F.

Those "F" *shakes head*, you know the movie is not that terrible!...dont be ridiculous people!

sure the movie is a "train wreck" (it is), the story is dumb, the visual effects cheesy as hell!!, the costume is bad (but Halle looked hot!!), that Basketball scene was stupid as well as the jewelry store fight!..............BUT, other than all of that, FUN!, on smore scenes

believe me ive seen Worst!

C-

If a movie fails on every level it wants to achieve, then it is an F. But I've seen worse too in 2004 and it's called Van Helsing...

Yeah, I've seen much worse then Catwoman



Definately.

Not as bad as everyone says. C-

A

Very underrated actually, greatly entertaining. Good action, decent acting, a lot of fun.



just kidding

Your crucifixtion is at sundown.

Hey, really, it wasn't bad!

Even if I lost all will to live and took drug after drug after drug and got drunk out of my freakin' mind, and lost 98% of my brain, I STILL wouldn't give Catwoman an "A". You'll rue the day you crossed me, Artur.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, you just need to appreciate it.

Lecter, are you serious? I'm surprised. I thought you would hate it.

](*,) *BOOM*

*Mr. X is dead.*

Well im suprised you liked it also Arthur, but, i am not complaining :wink: I lowered mine to a 'B+' from an 'A', but i still love this film, its becasue of the cheesiness and leather and easy storylike that its brilliant!

I wonder how many bandwagon junkies will "all of a sudden" like it because Arthur does :wink:

You know, upon second viewing. This movie ain't all that bad! I'd give it a B+ on second viewing. Maybe an A-.

The bABA has spoken!

...what's going on?! :wink:

Look, I know Catwoman wasn't good enough for your high standard of films, BUT it grossed 80 million domestically, and there will be an AvP2!!! Why must you argue that??????????? Catwoman is the best movie after AvP!!!!!!!

Actually, it grossed $40 million domestically. Idiot. =;

But I become confused because I love AvP so much, which is why I think everything else has only grossed 80 million domestically, thus the reasoning behind a sequel for AvP because every movie did that much!!!! WHy can't you understand that???????????????????????????????????????

Hey, guys, how about you scroll over my posting?