Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 5:31 pm



Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Blade Runner 

What grade would you give this film?
A 54%  54%  [ 15 ]
B 21%  21%  [ 6 ]
C 21%  21%  [ 6 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 28

 Blade Runner 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Blade Runner
Blade Runner

Image

Quote:
Blade Runner is a 1982 American science fiction film directed by Ridley Scott and starring Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, and Sean Young. The screenplay, written by Hampton Fancher and David Peoples, is based on the novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick.

The film depicts a dystopian Los Angeles in November 2019 in which genetically engineered organic robots called replicants—visually indistinguishable from adult humans—are manufactured by the powerful Tyrell Corporation as well as other mega manufacturers around the world. Their use on Earth is banned, and replicants are exclusively used for dangerous, menial or leisure work on Earth's off-world colonies. Replicants who defy the ban and return to Earth are hunted down and "retired" by police special operatives known as "Blade Runners". The plot focuses on a brutal and cunning group of recently escaped replicants hiding in Los Angeles and the burnt out expert blade runner, Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), who reluctantly agrees to take on one more assignment to hunt them down.

Blade Runner initially polarized critics: some were displeased with the pacing, while others enjoyed its thematic complexity. The film performed poorly in North American theaters. Despite the box office failure of the film, it has since become a cult classic, and is now widely regarded as one of the best movies ever made. Blade Runner has been hailed for its production design, depicting a "retrofitted" future, and it remains a leading example of the neo-noir genre. Blade Runner brought the work of author Philip K. Dick to the attention of Hollywood, and several more films have since been based on his work. Ridley Scott regards Blade Runner as "probably" his most complete and personal film. In 1993, Blade Runner was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".

Seven versions of the film have been shown for various markets as a result of controversial changes made by film executives. A rushed director's cut was released in 1992 after a strong response to workprint screenings. This, in conjunction with its popularity as a video rental, made it one of the first films released on DVD, resulting in a basic disc with mediocre video and audio quality. In 2007, Warner Bros. released in select theaters, and subsequently on DVD, HD DVD, and Blu-ray Disc, the 25th anniversary digitally remastered Final Cut by Scott.


Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:15 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
My all-time favorite movie. After I saw Blade Runner my love for the movies started. It has a smart screenplaying, dazzling production design and Harrison Ford at the top of his game. I prefer the Director's Cut because of the unicorn sequence and all that it implies, but nevertheless which version you see: Pure Genious! (A+)


Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:58 am
Profile
We had our time together
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 13270
Location: Vienna
Post 
edit


Last edited by Riggs on Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:20 am, edited 2 times in total.



Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:14 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
I think everyone loves it because for a sci-fi, its incredibly smart. Sci-fi in general, when done well, is an intelligent genre, but there are enough films set in the future which really don't explore where we "mankind" will be the way Blade Runner does.

One of my all-time favorites. Scott does everything here. Not only is his visual space convincing, it is well sourced and a bit depressing. The giant light billboard is truly a testament to attention span and consumer culture. The dark "Chinatown" opening is testament to the still patchy feel of big cities.

Blade Runner is sympathetic to everyone. The replicants, the specialist, even the corporate head responsible for updating replicants to the point they develope feelings. I like how Scott (and originally Dick) explore memory, questioning one's memory, and how memory informs personality. Can someone "create" your personality by controlling your memories? Its a great study in cultural conditioning. At the same time, it has a humanist element by having the replicants respond unexpectedly to their controlled mind. Kind of embraces individualism by doing that.

The acting is spectacular, and the director's cut goes one step better by eliminating some of Ford's voiceovers. The voiceovers were too expository and kind of told the audiance what they should think at given scenes instead of letting them come up with their own questions.

That and the movie itself is just so tight. The dialogue, "Is this testing whether I'm a replicant or a lesbian, Mr. Deckard?" and "The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long" is excellent. The "action" scenes are incredibly tight, violent, but not excessively violent just for the joy of violence, and the imagery is rich.

A+


Thu Apr 28, 2005 12:37 am
Profile
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
The version released in theaters: A+
The version you are able to buy on DVD now: B-

It's a good example of a director botching his own work by tinkering with it.


Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:41 am
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
I think everyone loves it because for a sci-fi, its incredibly smart. Sci-fi in general, when done well, is an intelligent genre, but there are enough films set in the future which really don't explore where we "mankind" will be the way Blade Runner does.

One of my all-time favorites. Scott does everything here. Not only is his visual space convincing, it is well sourced and a bit depressing. The giant light billboard is truly a testament to attention span and consumer culture. The dark "Chinatown" opening is testament to the still patchy feel of big cities.

Blade Runner is sympathetic to everyone. The replicants, the specialist, even the corporate head responsible for updating replicants to the point they develope feelings. I like how Scott (and originally Dick) explore memory, questioning one's memory, and how memory informs personality. Can someone "create" your personality by controlling your memories? Its a great study in cultural conditioning. At the same time, it has a humanist element by having the replicants respond unexpectedly to their controlled mind. Kind of embraces individualism by doing that.

The acting is spectacular, and the director's cut goes one step better by eliminating some of Ford's voiceovers. The voiceovers were too expository and kind of told the audiance what they should think at given scenes instead of letting them come up with their own questions.

That and the movie itself is just so tight. The dialogue, "Is this testing whether I'm a replicant or a lesbian, Mr. Deckard?" and "The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long" is excellent. The "action" scenes are incredibly tight, violent, but not excessively violent just for the joy of violence, and the imagery is rich.

A+


I never watched the whole thing. I love sci fi but this movie was putting me to sleep. I switched it off and watched South Park instead.


Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:42 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
C


For the risk of a public execution I proclaim this movie one of the five most overrated films of all time and the worst of Ridley Scott I have seen so far.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:16 am
Profile WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Off with Lecter's head!!! :mad: :tongue:

Curious, what are the other 4 overrated films in your list?

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:26 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Christian wrote:
Off with Lecter's head!!! :mad: :tongue:

Curious, what are the other 4 overrated films in your list?


I just said Top 5 to make sure I don't forget anything. I don't actually have such a Top 5 list, but I am sure that Blade Runner would be on there, right next to The Exorcist.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Jan 15, 2006 5:08 am
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25020
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
BJs Grade:

A+

oustanding watch :smile:

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:46 am
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25020
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
C


For the risk of a public execution I proclaim this movie one of the five most overrated films of all time and the worst of Ridley Scott I have seen so far.


:thumbsdown:

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:47 am
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21641
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
Awesome flick, I'm not sure which version I prefer, but both are great to look at. Anyone that claims Harrison Ford can't act or is one dimensional, really needs to open their eyes and really look at his performances. This was Ford at the height of his acting abilities, coming off the amazing uptake in Empire Strikes back, then Indiana, then a much darker look into a supposed hero that is almost a greek tragedy, depending on which way you look at. Then he went on to two very good sequels, then had awesome performances in Witness, Mysquito Coast, Frantic, and Working Girl.

Awesome message, along with style, acting and effects. One of the best films ever made.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:16 am
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:57 am
Posts: 4669
Location: Anchorage, AK
Post 
This film is pretty slow, but its one of the best films I've ever seen

A+

_________________
My Most anticipated films of 2015


Image


Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:34 am
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
A True Cult Classic, BLADE RUNNER is Dark and thought provoking all in the same breath.. Rent the DIRECTOR'S CUT.. I give this an "A"..


Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:36 am
Profile WWW
Squee

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm
Posts: 13270
Location: Yuppieville
Post 
The last time I saw it, which was a long long time ago (back when laser discs still existed) I remembered it being boring.

**

_________________
Setting most people on fire is wrong.
Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee."

:glare:


Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:39 am
Profile
Madoshi
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 12:35 pm
Posts: 631
Location: Cephiro
Post 
I mainly agree with Archie.

The original was a great SF Film Noir. A bit overblown but very enjoyable (A-)
The directors cut is a mess (D+)


Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:29 pm
Profile WWW
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
Awesome.


Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:13 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
I can't believe I've never seen this until now; it fits right into my favourites mould of dark, near-future setting with noir-ish stories and lots of eye candy. I guess I just never got around to it; now that I've seen it, I'm sorta glad I waited, as I would have found it boring when I was younger. As I remember, I started watching it once but could never finish it. Now that I've seen it for the first time as a (at least partially) mature film lover, I can fully appreciate its brilliance. And it is brilliant.

Definitely one of the most visionary films I've ever seen; it's right up there with 2001 in being incredibly ahead of its time, both visually and thematically. As a result, both films are able to transcend their release year, and both feel as though they could have been made today. The two films are kinda counterpoints to each other; while 2001 presents a relatively light future, this film is dark, dark, dark. The wide shots of futuristic Los Angeles are both stunning in their visual presentation and terrifying in their historical implications. The numerous and at time enormous advertisements show a world with capitalism run amok - not something terribly surprisingly given our world today. This film is 25 years old, but somehow it manages to be relevant even today.

The story is a combination of two of my favourite genres: film-noir and science fiction. I'm not sure, but I think this is the first cinematic combination of these two, something that has be re-done many times since. Some may think that the film moves too slow, but I was captivated by the story almost instantly. I would have liked to see more of Deckard's detective work, but there's ample amounts to satisfy my taste for mystery. The issues of humanity that it raises are intriguing and quite revolutionary, and the director's cut - which I saw - leaves the ending ambiguous as to Deckard's true identity. In fact, it leaves the entire film ambiguous - does Roy know Deckard? Is Deckard the 'missing' replicant? Utterly brilliant.

I don't think I can really do the visuals justice in words. Suffice to say, this is one of the most stunning films I've seen - ever. The effects would be amazing today, and the fact that it's from 1982 makes it even more incredible. The dark view of the future is achieved mostly by the terrific production design - something like 1940s Los Angeles with a digital edge. Not only does it look great, but the design is smart as well; it makes sense that immigration would get even worse in the future, so the city and its design is multicultural and multi ethnic. And the music, while obviously from the '80s, fits perfectly. Technically superb.

Though I've only just seen it for the first time, I feel confident that this will wind up in my all-time top ten after watching it again. I don't remember ever being this blown away by a film upon first viewing: it usually takes multiple viewings for me to really love a film. As it stands, this is one of the best films I've ever seen.

P.S. I should also say how unbelievably stacked the year 1982 was for science fiction. This, E.T. and The Thing released not only in the same year, but within weeks of each other. Insane.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:43 am
Profile
Iron Man

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:20 pm
Posts: 626
Location: N'awlins
Post 
One of my all-time favs. A story written during the golden age of sci-fi that's entertaining as well as thought provoking. A+

_________________
Image


Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:46 am
Profile WWW
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post 
One of the best sci fi movies of all time

A-.


Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:19 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
Post 
Harrison Ford is a replicant right? My initial reaction was a strong B+ after watching this recently, but thinking about it longer and discussing it with others, I'd move it up into an A- range.

Boy, Sean Young could have been great if she hadn't refused to play Hollywood's game, huh?

And when Daryl Hannah gets the right role.....Madison in Splash, Elle Driver in Kill Bill, or here......she's fantastic.


Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:50 am
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37996
Post Re: Blade Runner
So I finally saw Blade Runner.

For the most part, I thought it was a good and intellectual sci-fi story that is elevated hugely by the direction and visuals. I usually gravitate towards the story > visuals side, but this movie is just so so stunning. Scott creates a world, one that is enveloping and full of depth and believable... I never doubted for a second the existence of this place. Much like Alien, Scott also puts on a clinic in angles, shadows, and framing. While I have to let it sink it, much like that film, this may be one of the best directed films I've ever seen.

Harrison Ford is pretty revelatory here, I think this is his best and most fully-realized performance. Rutgar Hauer also does a pretty creepy if hammy villain, and the rest of the supporting players do their roles.

The pace of the film actually never bothered me. Did I notice it was "slow"? Yes. But it seemed to fit the movie and I was never bored. It was a clear decision by Scott to have the film run the way it did, and personally, I think it worked. I had a few other problems with the movie though, most noticeably I wasn't a fan of the romantic subplot and I would've liked to get more details on how Dick tracked these people down, and some stuff like the dove was a bit too blatent, but anyways.

Dolce covered a lot of the deeper messages of humanity and memories in the film, I won't go further in that because I'm sure some could explain it better than me. Or at least until I read a little more about the subtle metaphors and rewatch it. ;)

After finally getting my hands on Blade Runner, I can confirm it. Ridley Scott is my boi. Probably one of my favorites directors overall, actually.

4/5

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:03 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Blade Runner
Just got the Collector's Edition for Xmas. Looking forward to watching it again. I've seen it three times in the past eight months, wrote a paper on it, and I still want to give it another go. I think this may be my new all-time favourite film, I just love everything about it.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:04 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Blade Runner
This is one of those films where I understand the admiration more than I feel it. Like, not a personal fav, but if it appealed more to my personal tastes, it would be worthy.

But the constant re-releases/edits/cuts are silly.


Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:16 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Blade Runner
a very good, very overrated sci-fi film. B+

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:58 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.