Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:16 am



Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
 The Invisible Man (1933) 

What grade would you give this film?
A 100%  100%  [ 2 ]
B 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
C 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 2

 The Invisible Man (1933) 
Author Message
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post The Invisible Man (1933)
The Invisible Man

Image

Quote:
The Invisible Man is a 1933 science fiction film based on H. G. Wells' science fiction novel The Invisible Man, published in 1897, as adapted by R. C. Sherriff, Philip Wylie and Preston Sturges, whose work was considered unsatisfactory and who was taken off the project. The film was directed by James Whale and stars Claude Rains, in his first American screen appearance, and Gloria Stuart. It is considered one of the great Universal Horror films of the 1930s, and spawned a number of sequels, plus many spinoffs using the idea of an "invisible man" that were largely unrelated to Wells' original story.

Rains portrayed the Invisible Man (Dr. Jack Griffin) mostly only as a disembodied voice. Rains is only shown clearly for a brief time at the end of the film, spending most of his on-screen time covered by bandages.

In 2008, The Invisible Man was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".

_________________
---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--


Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:20 am
Profile WWW
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post 
The best of the Universal horror flicks. Every frame bleeds with imagination and visual ingenuity. Raines is, literally, a scream.

When it comes to these classic Univ. horror flicks, you need to follow only one rule: If Whale directed it, its a winner. If not, it's probably pretty stinky.

_________________
k


Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:38 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
I agree with yoshue.

Raines' chilling performance and the ground-breaking special effects would be enough for this film to be the best of the classic Universal horror flicks, but it's also got a terrific story - probably the best H.G. Wells adaptation put on screen - and some truly terrifying moments. It's incredibly dark and violent for a 1930s film. Putting aside the obvious faults of a movie from that era - melodramatic acting, unintentional comedy (or is it intentional?) - this film is one of the all-time horror classics. The iconic image of Griffin in his dark sunglasses and bandage-wrapped head is inherently frightening, as much as Hannibal Lecter or Norman Bates. One of my personal favourites.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:46 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.