Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:01 pm



Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
 Blood and Chocolate 

What grade would you give this film?
A 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
B 75%  75%  [ 3 ]
C 25%  25%  [ 1 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 4

 Blood and Chocolate 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post Blood and Chocolate
Blood and Chocolate

Image

Quote:
Blood & Chocolate is a 2007 film directed by Katja von Garnier, produced by Lakeshore Entertainment and distributed by MGM. It is very loosely based on the young-adult novel of the same name by Annette Curtis Klause, which was adapted into a screenplay by Ehren Kruger. The movie was released on DVD on June 13, 2007 in the USA.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Last edited by Joker's Thug #3 on Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Jan 26, 2007 4:06 pm
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
The movie looks terrible, and has a laughable name, but dammit it's actually pretty good. The story is well told and the acting is very nice as well. And Bruckner is very hot in the film. All in all it was much better than I thought and it was a fun film.

7.5/10

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:23 pm
Profile WWW
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13400
Post 
What is with that name anyways? I mean I just saw a decent TV spot for it that was ruined at the end when the voiceover guy had to say the idiotic name.

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:50 pm
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
I think it probbaly explains it a bit better in the book, but in the movie, they werewolves run a chocolate store and a very successful one. So maybe it is a contrast...you know the sweetness of chocolate and the bitterness of blood...it's a dichotomy of sorts i guess.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:17 pm
Profile WWW
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
I am truly shocked more haven't seen this film. ;)

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:14 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8626
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
I actually quite enjoyed it. It was fun, entertaining and had a cool little twist on teen romance. Much better than I thought it would be.

7/10 ( B )

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:47 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 34876
Location: Minnesota
Post 
BLOOD & CHOCOLATE - 7/10 ( B )

Not the abomination I was expecting it to be from the trailer. I thought the book was great and when I saw the trailer it was clear that they'd changed pretty much everything about it, so much that it hardly had anything in common with the book. While I rather they had been faithful to the book I will admit that the story translated well to this setting and there were changes I liked about it better, such as the ending. Agnes Bruckner was good and Hugh Dancy was cute and charming. I actually liked his character, which is mostly because he reminded me of someone.

Overall it was entertaining and the changes didn't bother me as much as I was expecting. It was better than Underworld and especially The Covenant, which was just atrocious.


Thu Jun 07, 2007 12:56 am
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21641
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
Gullimont wrote:
What is with that name anyways? I mean I just saw a decent TV spot for it that was ruined at the end when the voiceover guy had to say the idiotic name.


Apparently its what blood looks like in the moonlight, or some shit like that

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:00 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post 
baumer72 wrote:
I think it probbaly explains it a bit better in the book, but in the movie, they werewolves run a chocolate store and a very successful one. So maybe it is a contrast...you know the sweetness of chocolate and the bitterness of blood...it's a dichotomy of sorts i guess.

Err... chocolate is bitter and blood is sweet/salty...


Thu Jun 07, 2007 12:25 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Yeah, surprisingly, it's not as awful as the marketing suggested, though I wouldn't give it high praise, either. It's just a decent, "been there, done that" kind of film.

C+


Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:20 pm
Profile
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37152
Location: The Graveyard
Post 
B

Not as good as Underworld/Underworld: Evolution, but better than The Covenant. I'm really glad the movie is just over 90 minutes. I was afraid there'd be too much talking and everything that would make the movie overlong, but thankfully it wasn't. I felt it was pretty average for the first half, but the second half got alot better. I somewhat wish Vivian would have die saving dammit..what was his name...oh hell, the character Hugh Dancy plays. He is hot by the way. I've liked him since Ella Enchanted. The only real grip I have with the film is that it's not as raw as I would have liked. I think if they took some chances, chances that would have given it an R rating, it could have been a bit better. Also, Gabriel (sp?) wasn't a great villian, imo. Or misunderstood character if you will. But overall it's a solid film that unfortunately bombed badly.

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:34 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
C


Well, as far as compliments go, let me just say that it is much better than Skinwalkers. That, however, doesn't really say much because it's not a stretch to me better than that pile of crap. While I agree that Blood and Chocolate isn't as terrible as the teaser/trailer suggested, I would also disagree with the positive reviews in this thread. The movie is a very generic Rome and Juliet-like love story that really took no chances and got stuck in its own predictability and clichés. The werewolves here didn't really seem like "actual werewolves" you see depicted in most films, but much rather like normal wolves. But at least, they didn't have to bother with horrible effects like Skinwalkers did. I also think that the lack of action hurt it a bit, though there are a couple of nice scenes towards the end. I can understand that, though, since it's primarily a love story.

The reason why I don't give the movie a worse grade is that the both leads, Agnes Bruckner and Hugh Dancy had pretty good chemistry with each other which is needed for a film like this. Moreover, I thought that Agnes Bruckner did a pretty good acting job in this one (I generally think she's underrated, especially after her great turn in Blue Car). The movie is never boring or tedious with the things going on at a steady pace, but it simply lacks anything that would raise it above average.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:10 am
Profile WWW
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 34876
Location: Minnesota
Post Re: Blood and Chocolate
I wonder if this had been released after Twilight if it would have performed better. I'd say yes personally.


Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:11 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Flava'd vs The World, Shack and 197 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.