Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:49 pm



Reply to topic  [ 239 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
 United 93 

What grade would you give this film?
A 69%  69%  [ 35 ]
B 14%  14%  [ 7 ]
C 6%  6%  [ 3 ]
D 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
F 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
I don't plan on seeing this film 8%  8%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 51

 United 93 
Author Message
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48626
Location: Arlington, VA
Post United 93
United 93

Image

Quote:
United 93 (also known as Flight 93) is a British 2006 fact-based historical drama film written, co-produced, and directed by Paul Greengrass that chronicles events aboard United Airlines Flight 93, which was hijacked during the September 11 attacks. The film attempts to recount with as much veracity as possible (there is a disclaimer that some imagination had to be used) and in real time (from the flight's takeoff) what has come to be known in the United States as an iconic moment of heroism. According to the filmmakers, the film was made with the cooperation of many of the passengers' families (though there are some notable exceptions).

United 93 premiered on April 26, 2006 at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York City, a festival founded to celebrate New York City as a major filmmaking center and to contribute towards the long-term recovery of Lower Manhattan. Several family members of the passengers aboard the flight attended the premiere to show their support.

The film opened nationwide in North America on April 28, 2006. Ten percent of the gross from the three-day opening weekend was promised toward a donation to create a memorial for the victims of Flight 93. United 93 grossed $31.4 million in the United States, and $76.2 million worldwide.


Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:12 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
Image

United 93, the new film chronicling the famed "flight that fought back" on that fateful day in September, must have been a hard film to dramatize. With loads of controversy and complaints surrounding its release, it is hard to tell if the film will open people's eyes or keep them at bay. Early promotional material for the film was met with utter criticism, causing it to be pulled from many theater chains. However, this has not stopped the film from quietly becoming one of the season's must see events. Thankfully, director Paul Greengrass has created an excellent, intense and powerful drama that stays true to the actual events. Unfortunately, while the film is great, it is not the kind of film that you will ever want to see again.

Unlike most films, United 93 doesn't look at each character and delve into their personal life. In fact, we don't even know the names of most that appear on screen. Because of this, most of the characters are divided into two groups - the passengers and the terrorists on the plane. Greengrass's choice to do this works very well and adds to the film's realism. It is not important to know who these characters are and what they have done in the past. What matters is now, and how they react to the situation that they are in. All of the actors give top-notch performances. Almost all of them are complete unknowns, which makes you look at them as real people and not just actors playing a part.

Paul Greengrass has done an excellent job directing this film and should be remembered come awards season. The film is shot almost as if it were a documentary, with shaky handheld camera techniques used throughout. This makes it feel as if you are right in there with the characters as the events of the day unfold. Greengrass successfully makes the airplane environment seem tight and claustorphobic, moving the camera just the right way to show the complete instability of the location. He also never shies away from any aspect of the true story. Everything is graphic, realistic and haunting. In terms of writing, the screenplay (also by Greengrass) is exceptional - particularly in the film's final moments.

The musical score by John Powell should also be noted. It is incredibly subtle, but when it is used it adds a pulsating sense of urgency to the scene - making everything much more intense. It also doesn't overwhelm the audience with loud interludes. Everything is subdued and fairly quiet, but just as effective.

Overall, United 93 is highly recommended for its fantastic portrayl of this real-life tragedy. Everyone should definitely make an effort to see this important film. But be warned beforehand - this is a film that is incredibly hard to watch. It will keep your nerves on edge from the opening scene until the powerful and unbelievably haunting end.

8/10 (A-)


Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:42 pm
Profile YIM
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5567
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post 
thompsoncory wrote:
It will keep your nerves on edge from the opening scene until the powerful and unbelievably haunting end.



I wonder what happens in the end...

So, does it present the events as fact or does it give you a fair and balanced portrait, in other words, does the movie hint at other possibilities of what happened on that fateful flight?


Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:47 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
Sam Nasty wrote:
thompsoncory wrote:
It will keep your nerves on edge from the opening scene until the powerful and unbelievably haunting end.



I wonder what happens in the end...

So, does it present the events as fact or does it give you a fair and balanced portrait, in other words, does the movie hint at other possibilities of what happened on that fateful flight?


I know that everyone knows what happens in the end, but the way that it is done is incredibly effective.

And it doesn't really hint at other possibilities for the most part. It answers many questions cinematically, such as where the terrorists plan to crash the plane into (the Capital) and such.


Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:50 pm
Profile YIM
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5567
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post 
thompsoncory wrote:

And it doesn't really hint at other possibilities for the most part. It answers many questions cinematically, such as where the terrorists plan to crash the plane into (the Capital) and such.


ugh i was afraid of this. It's like pop culture now believes that this plain was in fact headed for DC, that passengers crashed it to save it, and worse of all, that we know all there is to know about the crash when in fact we dont.


Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:53 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
It is, in all honesty, one of the hardest films I've ever had to watch.


Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:24 pm
Profile WWW
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
It is, in all honesty, one of the hardest films I've ever had to watch.


I completely agree.


Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:30 pm
Profile YIM
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post 
Dear directors,

Stop trying.

Kkthx,
kypade


Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:31 pm
Profile
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
kypade wrote:
Dear directors,

Stop trying.

Kkthx,
kypade


you saw it?


Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:18 pm
Profile WWW
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
I'm surprised that more from here haven't seen this by now. I would have expected more reviews.


Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:46 pm
Profile YIM
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
Very, very difficult to watch but very well done, although it could have been about 15-20 minutes shorter. Also, Greengrass is too much in love with the jumpy camera which is very annoying. Leave it still sometimes.

Grade: A-


Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:04 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
I was riveted. It left me shaken. More so than I can remember in any film in recent memory. And maybe the only such experience I've had in a theater setting.

But before I start singing the film's praises...

Can I honestly give a positive review to/recommend a film that pretty much left me agony from frame to frame? I usually like being "riveted," but as I was coming out of the theater, I wondered to myself whether or not I would want someone else to experience what I'd just experienced, and my conclusion was basically...

No.

More later.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:09 am
Profile WWW
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post 
Dkmuto wrote:
I was riveted. It left me shaken. More so than I can remember in any film in recent memory. And maybe the only such experience I've had in a theater setting.

But before I start singing the film's praises...

Can I honestly give a positive review to/recommend a film that pretty much left me agony from frame to frame? I usually like being "riveted," but as I was coming out of the theater, I wondered to myself whether or not I would want someone else to experience what I'd just experienced, and my conclusion was basically...

No.

More later.


I feel the same way pretty much.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:25 am
Profile YIM
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
thompsoncory wrote:
I'm surprised that more from here haven't seen this by now. I would have expected more reviews.


Because most of us including myself have no desire or morbid fascination in seeing something like this that makes you want to slit your wrist on the way out of the theatre that's why.. I mean, I'm sure it's probably well done, but come on already.. For someone to sit through this more than once leads me to believe that there is a morbid fascination with the individual wanting to see this more than once..


Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:27 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8626
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
Well I feel like slitting my wrists after reading all your posts, but I still read them..

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:36 am
Profile YIM WWW
Teenage Dream

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
Post 
This film is probably impossible to grade. I actually found the first half, before the towers were hit, to be slightly boring and incompetent. We were left to watch a bunch of green dots on screens and hear a bunch of guys with thick accents yell and scream at each other. Once the film starts to get focus though, and we train in on the passengers of flight 93, it hits a whole new level. By the time the final frame rolled, I felt completely overwhelmed and emotionally devastated. During the final fifteen minutes, I had to choke back tears several times for fear of just completely breaking down and bawling. I'm a firm believer that a film's main objective should be to make you feel. Whatever that emotion may be. And in that regard, United 93 is on a league of it's own. I had a gut level, visceral reaction to this film like none other. It's an emotional sucker punch in every sense of the word. To see these people fight and scratch and claw and tear other human beings limb from limb, and knowing in the back of your mind that it's all for not... it's just devastating.

In regards to the film being potentially jingoistic... it's not in the slightest. There are no "ra-ra, go America!" moments. Greengrass plays on an even keel as much as one could with this subject matter. There are no black and white caricatures to be found here, even with the terrorists. Everything has a distinct shade of grey, and I applaud the film for that.

The technical aspects, which seem almost kind of pointless to discuss with a film like this... I'm not a fan of Greengrass's directing style. The first half of the film was a bit of mess, partly because of it. I felt the final third really played to his strengths as a filmmaker, though, and the style is completely appropriate. The score was excellent. Nothing overbearing or too dramatic. It fit perfectly, and helped elevate certain scenes. The acting ranged from great to decent, which I guess can be expected.

If I'm grading United 93 as a film and strictly a film, removing all emotion from it (which I again I think is crucial to a film), I'd give it a C. It's inconsistent (the second half is much better than the first), and I hate the style of filmmaking. However, the way this film made me feel... I've never felt like that during a film before, and I seriously doubt I ever will again. I have to give this film an A because of the emotional impact it had on me. It was just too much to ignore, and isn't that why we all go to the movies? To feel something? Well, here's your chance.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:03 am
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
It's so hard to watch, but it has to be seen, I think. The film isn't technically perfect (not a fan of the camera style), but I don't recall a film having such a big emotional impact on me as this one did.

A-


Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:04 am
Profile
Teenage Dream

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
Post 
One more thing...

I really don't know how or why this film had such a huge impact on me. I went in feeling extremely cynical towards it. So, I'd recommend that everyone that feels that way, should give it a shot.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:06 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
The short of it is that we as human beings are naturally moved by displays of heroism and courage, and especially when we have a personal connection to the event during which the heroism was displayed.


Since you and I and everyone else witnessed 9/11 in real-time, it is part of our life, and the events in the film are much more personal than they would otherwise be. There is no good historical equivalent, because thanks to the global communications system, we watched the events unfold in a way that people could not have when Pearl Harbour was attacked or the atomic bomb dropped. But sufficeth to say that future generations, being removed from the events, will judge the film from a distance, perhaps appreciating the heroism therein (which is eternal), but probably not responding to it in a directly emotional way as you did.

Anyways, that's what I think.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:44 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
movies35 wrote:
Well I feel like slitting my wrists after reading all your posts, but I still read them..


I actually HAVE slit my wrist's reading your posts, but I'm still a survivor..


Sat Apr 29, 2006 8:56 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
It's so hard to watch, but it has to be seen, I think. The film isn't technically perfect (not a fan of the camera style), but I don't recall a film having such a big emotional impact on me as this one did.

A-


Why?? Why does it have to be seen?? I can turn on CNN or Headline News right now and they'll beat you across the head with this movie to the point where you've actually seen it already, except FOR REAL.. No movie adaptation of it.. I'll pass..


Sat Apr 29, 2006 8:58 am
Profile WWW
Post 
Box wrote:
Since you and I and everyone else witnessed 9/11 in real-time


That's not entirely true. I was out having breakfast with my brother when cells phones started going off. Instead of running home and being glued to the tv, we continued our morning as much as we could, finished eating, went DVD shopping at Circuit City, etc...


Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:09 am
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Box wrote:
Since you and I and everyone else witnessed 9/11 in real-time


That's not entirely true. I was out having breakfast with my brother when cells phones started going off. Instead of running home and being glued to the tv, we continued our morning as much as we could, finished eating, went DVD shopping at Circuit City, etc...


Circuit City needed business too


Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:37 am
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
It's so hard to watch, but it has to be seen, I think. The film isn't technically perfect (not a fan of the camera style), but I don't recall a film having such a big emotional impact on me as this one did.

A-


Why?? Why does it have to be seen?? I can turn on CNN or Headline News right now and they'll beat you across the head with this movie to the point where you've actually seen it already, except FOR REAL.. No movie adaptation of it.. I'll pass..


No, see, when I said that it "must be seen," I was referring to normal people. You're fine to sit home and watch CNN with bradley witherberry on your couch.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:21 pm
Profile
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post 
I don't think it's something that needs to be seen by anyone, mostly because, well, it's just not that good. Everything outside of the plane is a mess and boring. They did a pretty good job with the stuff ON the plane...or rather, they did a good job with the "fight back"...the normal "all's well" portions were pretty hokey...the only thing that really made it worth watching were the phone calls home and the actual rebellion.

I dunno.

I do agree that the ending was pretty fantastic (the real ending, the last minute or so), but I wish it hadn't gone to black-with-white-text.

I think, really, I just wished it was more encompassing, made it clear just how important that day really was...it almost felt like this was the story of a hijacking that just happened to coincidentally fall on September 11th.

Meh.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:43 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 239 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 235 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.