Screen Counts/Crowd Reports for March 18-20.
Author |
Message |
misterglass
Iron Man
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:56 pm Posts: 678
|
4 sold out shows at midnight!?!? Holy crap!! I lowered my prediction after seeing it on Tuesday, too. It's funny because everyone at the screening I saw it at seemed to really hate it, but it was definitely an older crowd as well as critics, so maybe the people who really wanted to see it (those under 18) weren't affected by those who saw it early. But still...that many people going to see a movie at midnight on a Friday night!? I'd have fallen asleep if I tried staying up to watch it that late! (Granted, I'm rather ollllllddddd. I'm like the crypt keeper. <G>)
If it makes more than $50 million, I probably piss myself, because I shorted it on HSX...I'm thinking with that many midnight shows selling out, that has to be frontloaded. Dawn of the Dead had a 2.4 mult this time last year, and I don't see Ring 2 being a better movie.
_________________ misterglass/NYC
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:26 am |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
I don't think that Ice Princess would necesarily play well across the board, although i still think anything less than $10m for it is a server dissapointment.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:27 am |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
I need to call my theater. Apparently, I got the shitty version of The Ring II since A LOT of you seem to love the movie.
The Poltergiest factor is one of a dozen or so glaring issues with The Ring II.
At least the family in Poltergiest were bright enough to ditch tvs for a while when they escaped the house. The hotel scene (pushing the tv outside) made perfect sense.
Why on Earth would Watts' character keep tvs in her house if was the preferred mode of travel for Samara?
There are way too many other instances like the above that bog down the movie.
It's just a really dumb film.
I never expected it to as good as The Ring. I just wanted a film that was watchable.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:14 am |
|
 |
misterglass
Iron Man
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:56 pm Posts: 678
|
Yeah, I think the Poltergeist 2 analogy really works... I guess all the teens who rushed out to see it yesterday weren't old enough to remember how bad Poltergeist 2 was to the original. I think it will be hard for it to maintain any of that business from yesterday...horror movie, sequel, big opening...not a long-term type of movie.
_________________ misterglass/NYC
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:19 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: I need to call my theater. Apparently, I got the shitty version of The Ring II since A LOT of you seem to love the movie. The Poltergiest factor is one of a dozen or so glaring issues with The Ring II. At least the family in Poltergiest were bright enough to ditch tvs for a while when they escaped the house. The hotel scene (pushing the tv outside) made perfect sense. Why on Earth would Watts' character keep tvs in her house if was the preferred mode of travel for Samara? There are way too many other instances like the above that bog down the movie. It's just a really dumb film. I never expected it to as good as The Ring. I just wanted a film that was watchable.
:laugh: Poltergeist II was another film that wasn't needed and the 3rd one was Godawful.. This movie earned it's own "E" True Hollywood Story for all the spookiness that went on while Spielberg was making that film..
_________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:16 am |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
I actually wasn't comparing it to Poltergiest II. What I was saying is that in the context of the story laid out, I find it unbelievable that the family would own televisions so soon after the events of the first film (hence what happened in Poltergiest at the hotel).
There are many instances like that in Ring II that make it very hard to suspend disbelief. You can be a great film or even just a good one and things can be overlooked. But when you're fairly shitty, they become 
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:02 am |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
I certainly think a RING sequel was a good idea; im not usually a sequel kind of guy but entertainment like The Ring and The Grudge needs to be extended ! I Like insomnia!
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:08 am |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11028
|
BKB smacked all our asses this week.
Ring 2 aint shit!what a godawful film it was,i found the first film not scary and average.The second one is almost as bad as the grudge,Truly awful.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:24 pm |
|
 |
JMorphin
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 11:58 am Posts: 1335 Location: Austin, TX
|
JMorphin wrote: Guys...the Ring 2 didn't do much at my theater.
I mean, we are one of the Regal theaters that had only one screen of it, and, I don't know...
the 6:50 show didn't sell out till 6:15 (kind of appalling, since there's no other show till 9:50) the 9:50 show sold out at 7:30 (which is actually really late to sell out, since this is the only prime time show) and the 12:20 show was only 2/3 full when I left at 10:30.
This actually really bugs me, because I remember the day 8 Mile opened at my theater with 3 screens, all the night shows were sold out except for the midnight BEFORE 7, and the Ring 2 couldn't even manage to sell out the night for one single screen.
From the looks of it, I don't see this movie topping 15 million for Friday, but I'm really hoping that other theaters did OK with this movie. It appears as if my theater didn't lose much business at all, because the spillover was tremendous, and we were very busy until 10PM. Two managers had to jump on register to sell for Constantine, Hitch, Pacifier, Ice Princess did decent early on, and this was after the Ring shows sold out. So I think Regal corp made a good call to make more revenue for themselves by hanging on to the older movies (because they get a lot bigger % of the ticket receipts for movies that have been in theaters for over a month). I think Brandon's and my 50 million predictions are out of the water. Something in the upper 30's to lower 40's seems more likely at this point. But who knows, it's hard to gauge a movie's business based on one screen :wink:
Wow, did I call this opening number or what. My faith in my theater representing the country is still in tact. Go Regal, lol! They definitely made a dent in the Ring 2, that goes to show when you piss off the country's biggest chain :wink:
_________________ "Do or do not, there is no try."
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:40 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
JMorphin wrote: JMorphin wrote: Guys...the Ring 2 didn't do much at my theater.
I mean, we are one of the Regal theaters that had only one screen of it, and, I don't know...
the 6:50 show didn't sell out till 6:15 (kind of appalling, since there's no other show till 9:50) the 9:50 show sold out at 7:30 (which is actually really late to sell out, since this is the only prime time show) and the 12:20 show was only 2/3 full when I left at 10:30.
This actually really bugs me, because I remember the day 8 Mile opened at my theater with 3 screens, all the night shows were sold out except for the midnight BEFORE 7, and the Ring 2 couldn't even manage to sell out the night for one single screen.
From the looks of it, I don't see this movie topping 15 million for Friday, but I'm really hoping that other theaters did OK with this movie. It appears as if my theater didn't lose much business at all, because the spillover was tremendous, and we were very busy until 10PM. Two managers had to jump on register to sell for Constantine, Hitch, Pacifier, Ice Princess did decent early on, and this was after the Ring shows sold out. So I think Regal corp made a good call to make more revenue for themselves by hanging on to the older movies (because they get a lot bigger % of the ticket receipts for movies that have been in theaters for over a month). I think Brandon's and my 50 million predictions are out of the water. Something in the upper 30's to lower 40's seems more likely at this point. But who knows, it's hard to gauge a movie's business based on one screen :wink: Wow, did I call this opening number or what. My faith in my theater representing the country is still in tact. Go Regal, lol! They definitely made a dent in the Ring 2, that goes to show when you piss off the country's biggest chain :wink:
Regal is the biggest chain? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought it was AMC.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:06 pm |
|
 |
JMorphin
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 11:58 am Posts: 1335 Location: Austin, TX
|
Yep, since Regal took over Hoyts, and I'm counting Regal Entertainment Group, which has control over Edwards Theaters and United Artists theaters :wink:
_________________ "Do or do not, there is no try."
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:09 pm |
|
 |
sako
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:07 pm Posts: 1684
|
I never go to Regal, I also go to AMC or Arclight. I thought that AMC was the biggest too.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:32 pm |
|
 |
The Scottie
King Albert!
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm Posts: 11838 Location: The Happiest City on Earth
|
Libs wrote: JMorphin wrote: JMorphin wrote: Guys...the Ring 2 didn't do much at my theater.
I mean, we are one of the Regal theaters that had only one screen of it, and, I don't know...
the 6:50 show didn't sell out till 6:15 (kind of appalling, since there's no other show till 9:50) the 9:50 show sold out at 7:30 (which is actually really late to sell out, since this is the only prime time show) and the 12:20 show was only 2/3 full when I left at 10:30.
This actually really bugs me, because I remember the day 8 Mile opened at my theater with 3 screens, all the night shows were sold out except for the midnight BEFORE 7, and the Ring 2 couldn't even manage to sell out the night for one single screen.
From the looks of it, I don't see this movie topping 15 million for Friday, but I'm really hoping that other theaters did OK with this movie. It appears as if my theater didn't lose much business at all, because the spillover was tremendous, and we were very busy until 10PM. Two managers had to jump on register to sell for Constantine, Hitch, Pacifier, Ice Princess did decent early on, and this was after the Ring shows sold out. So I think Regal corp made a good call to make more revenue for themselves by hanging on to the older movies (because they get a lot bigger % of the ticket receipts for movies that have been in theaters for over a month). I think Brandon's and my 50 million predictions are out of the water. Something in the upper 30's to lower 40's seems more likely at this point. But who knows, it's hard to gauge a movie's business based on one screen :wink: Wow, did I call this opening number or what. My faith in my theater representing the country is still in tact. Go Regal, lol! They definitely made a dent in the Ring 2, that goes to show when you piss off the country's biggest chain :wink: Regal is the biggest chain? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought it was AMC.
What he means is that Regal has the most theaters. AMC's are still the highest grossing theater, even though we don't have a much theaters as they do.
_________________Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.  and many more.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:43 pm |
|
 |
Impact
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm Posts: 8773 Location: New Mexico
|
Zing:
I'm very upset at you!
_________________ Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:50 pm |
|
 |
JMorphin
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 11:58 am Posts: 1335 Location: Austin, TX
|
http://www.cnn.com/2003/BUSINESS/asia/0 ... acker.biz/
Yes, Scott may be right about AMC making more money, but that article say it all. It's old news, folks :wink:
_________________ "Do or do not, there is no try."
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:51 pm |
|
 |
Animosity Reigns
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 8:41 pm Posts: 1777 Location: The Dirty South
|
Scott Vasquez wrote: Libs wrote: JMorphin wrote: JMorphin wrote: Guys...the Ring 2 didn't do much at my theater.
I mean, we are one of the Regal theaters that had only one screen of it, and, I don't know...
the 6:50 show didn't sell out till 6:15 (kind of appalling, since there's no other show till 9:50) the 9:50 show sold out at 7:30 (which is actually really late to sell out, since this is the only prime time show) and the 12:20 show was only 2/3 full when I left at 10:30.
This actually really bugs me, because I remember the day 8 Mile opened at my theater with 3 screens, all the night shows were sold out except for the midnight BEFORE 7, and the Ring 2 couldn't even manage to sell out the night for one single screen.
From the looks of it, I don't see this movie topping 15 million for Friday, but I'm really hoping that other theaters did OK with this movie. It appears as if my theater didn't lose much business at all, because the spillover was tremendous, and we were very busy until 10PM. Two managers had to jump on register to sell for Constantine, Hitch, Pacifier, Ice Princess did decent early on, and this was after the Ring shows sold out. So I think Regal corp made a good call to make more revenue for themselves by hanging on to the older movies (because they get a lot bigger % of the ticket receipts for movies that have been in theaters for over a month). I think Brandon's and my 50 million predictions are out of the water. Something in the upper 30's to lower 40's seems more likely at this point. But who knows, it's hard to gauge a movie's business based on one screen :wink: Wow, did I call this opening number or what. My faith in my theater representing the country is still in tact. Go Regal, lol! They definitely made a dent in the Ring 2, that goes to show when you piss off the country's biggest chain :wink: Regal is the biggest chain? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought it was AMC. What he means is that Regal has the most theaters. AMC's are still the highest grossing theater, even though we don't have a much theaters as they do.
Actually I would have bet my life on it that the biggest grossing theatre was a Loews in NYC...at least all the big blockbusters have the biggest opening weekend there anywho...
Oh and Regal pulls in about 15%-20% more profit each year than AMC due to the fact they spend an arm and a leg on rent/leases on the buildings, they never buy thier own land etc
edit : my bad read it wrong thought you said AMC had the highest grossing theatre :razz:
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 3:09 pm |
|
 |
misterglass
Iron Man
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:56 pm Posts: 678
|
I know the Regal in Union Square does huge business most of the time with only about 14 theatres or so. They played Spider-Man on about half of them and they were sold out for most of the day...also ran the Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, etc.
The Regal down in Battery Park does really awful business most of the time because it's too far out of the way except for those who live downtown that far. Not sure if those who work on Wall Street and in Tribeca bother to stay in town to see movies there at night.
The AMC theatre in NYC (the only one as far as I know) is in Times Square and it also does tons of business but it also has at least 20 theatres, maybe more. I haven't even been in half the theatres because I usually go to Regal or Loews where I have passes. Only go to AMC for free preview screenings...it has absolutely one of the WORST exits I've ever seen in a building and I'm surprised that the fire marshal doesn't close them down. (A sly hint to the Loews across the street if they want to increase their business <G>)
Oh, and I'm floored by the discrepancy in business between theatres...how does Scott's sell out dozens of shows including interlocked and JM's theatre barely sell out a handful? I guess that's why we saw such a low Friday because it all averages out and there must have been a few theatres running it that lost business to the bigger stadium seating places.
_________________ misterglass/NYC
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:28 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
The Ring Two
AMC Marple 10
7:30pm, 500 seats, Sold Out
Trailers
The Skeleton Key (nothin'; looks okay)
Red Eye (whispering; looks great)
Fever Pitch (laughs; looks funny)
War of the Worlds (whispers; can't wait)
The Island (nothin'; can't wait)
The crowd was enjoying the movie throughout. Laughing at the extra cheesy moments. Naomi's famous line was the moment of the night. Had everyone cracking up. Literally. I heard mixed reactions going out. Most said good, but the first was better.
Movie
After such a long wait, I can't say that I didn't love it. I guess it's not what I expected, and I wasn't as dissapointed as I could have been because I was warned ahead of time about it. It's definently not a horror movie. I don't think they really even tried to scare the audience (except, maybe, once). It's definently a drama with some freaky moments thrown in. I loved the story. I'm surprised, because I thought the story would be the weak part about the movie, but it was it's strong point, in my opinion. Naomi Watts's performance was good, though it doesn't match up to her performance in the first. As for The Ring vs. The Ring Two... well, it's a no contest. The Ring was the best horror movie I've ever seen. It brought a great premise, and scares. The Ring Two brought a great premise and answered a lot of the unanswered questions in the first. It definently doesn't meet up to the first, but I never expected it to. The one thing I noticed was that they didn't really focus too much on the actual tape in this movie, but more Aden and Samara. Overall, I enjoyed it a lot, especially since I expected to be a little dissapointed. A-
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:41 pm |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
shades033 wrote: 4 sold out shows at midnight!?!? Holy crap!! I lowered my prediction after seeing it on Tuesday, too. It's funny because everyone at the screening I saw it at seemed to really hate it, but it was definitely an older crowd as well as critics, so maybe the people who really wanted to see it (those under 18) weren't affected by those who saw it early. But still...that many people going to see a movie at midnight on a Friday night!? I'd have fallen asleep if I tried staying up to watch it that late! (Granted, I'm rather ollllllddddd. I'm like the crypt keeper. <G>)
If it makes more than $50 million, I probably piss myself, because I shorted it on HSX...I'm thinking with that many midnight shows selling out, that has to be frontloaded. Dawn of the Dead had a 2.4 mult this time last year, and I don't see Ring 2 being a better movie.
I wonder if the Friday estimates count all of the midnight shows from Thursday night? While I don't expect them to be anywhere near the $11 million (?) of The Matrix Reloaded or the $8 million of Return of the King, they easily could have been $2-$3 million. Also, the midnight Friday shows will be added to Saturday's numbers which could mean the increase could be better then expected?
_________________ See above.
|
Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:53 pm |
|
 |
Bryan_smith
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:13 pm Posts: 2120
|
RogueCommander wrote: shades033 wrote: 4 sold out shows at midnight!?!? Holy crap!! I lowered my prediction after seeing it on Tuesday, too. It's funny because everyone at the screening I saw it at seemed to really hate it, but it was definitely an older crowd as well as critics, so maybe the people who really wanted to see it (those under 18) weren't affected by those who saw it early. But still...that many people going to see a movie at midnight on a Friday night!? I'd have fallen asleep if I tried staying up to watch it that late! (Granted, I'm rather ollllllddddd. I'm like the crypt keeper. <G>)
If it makes more than $50 million, I probably piss myself, because I shorted it on HSX...I'm thinking with that many midnight shows selling out, that has to be frontloaded. Dawn of the Dead had a 2.4 mult this time last year, and I don't see Ring 2 being a better movie. I wonder if the Friday estimates count all of the midnight shows from Thursday night? While I don't expect them to be anywhere near the $11 million (?) of The Matrix Reloaded or the $8 million of Return of the King, they easily could have been $2-$3 million. Also, the midnight Friday shows will be added to Saturday's numbers which could mean the increase could be better then expected?
That's an interesting question. do shows after midnight on Friday night go towards Saturday's total??
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:55 am |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
I would assume so since techincally they are not Friday shows.
_________________ See above.
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:58 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
RogueCommander wrote: I would assume so since techincally they are not Friday shows.
I'm almost positive midnight shows count for Friday, despite falling on Saturday.
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:29 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Well just don't say that Friday was inflated by Thursday night Midnight shows. For one, no Regal theater had them, and really, besides there not being many of them, I don't think many people even knew or cared enough.
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:06 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Zingaling wrote: The Ring Two AMC Marple 10 7:30pm, 500 seats, Sold Out
Trailers The Skeleton Key (nothin'; looks okay) Red Eye (whispering; looks great) Fever Pitch (laughs; looks funny) War of the Worlds (whispers; can't wait) The Island (nothin'; can't wait)
The crowd was enjoying the movie throughout. Laughing at the extra cheesy moments. Naomi's famous line was the moment of the night. Had everyone cracking up. Literally. I heard mixed reactions going out. Most said good, but the first was better.
Movie After such a long wait, I can't say that I didn't love it. I guess it's not what I expected, and I wasn't as dissapointed as I could have been because I was warned ahead of time about it. It's definently not a horror movie. I don't think they really even tried to scare the audience (except, maybe, once). It's definently a drama with some freaky moments thrown in. I loved the story. I'm surprised, because I thought the story would be the weak part about the movie, but it was it's strong point, in my opinion. Naomi Watts's performance was good, though it doesn't match up to her performance in the first. As for The Ring vs. The Ring Two... well, it's a no contest. The Ring was the best horror movie I've ever seen. It brought a great premise, and scares. The Ring Two brought a great premise and answered a lot of the unanswered questions in the first. It definently doesn't meet up to the first, but I never expected it to. The one thing I noticed was that they didn't really focus too much on the actual tape in this movie, but more Aden and Samara. Overall, I enjoyed it a lot, especially since I expected to be a little dissapointed. A-
I'm anxious to see what your REAL grade is for this movie in the next week or so after your restrained enthusiasm has died down for this and you can really look at the big picture and realize the movie blew.. You gave this movie an "A-" But for a movie that you gave an "A" for which techincally would make it damn near perfect, you still seem somewhat bummed about it from your brief review for giving this such a high grade as though your mind was made up ahead of time before seeing it to give it this grade....
_________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:47 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
Talk about making your mind up about a movie before you see it. If there is anyone on these boards who does that the most, it's you BKB. :wink:
|
Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:18 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 83 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|