Author |
Message |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
They deserve it, should be a big party in 2016.
|
Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:53 pm |
|
 |
Price
Gamaur's sex slave
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm Posts: 8889 Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
CONGRATULATIONS TO RIO!  66 vs 32 votes. They won by a landslide.
_________________
|
Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:54 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Congrats Rio. Going to a fun and hot Olympics.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:27 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
First round: Madrid - 28 Rio - 26 Tokyo - 21 Chicago - 18 Second round: Rio - 46 Madrid - 29 Tokyo - 20 Third round: Rio - 66 Madrid - 32 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Summer_OlympicsChicago folks pretty much all went for Rio and established its lead from there on.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:45 pm |
|
 |
Grill
Forum General
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am Posts: 8684
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
xiayun wrote: First round: Madrid - 28 Rio - 26 Tokyo - 21 Chicago - 18 Second round: Rio - 46 Madrid - 29 Tokyo - 20 Third round: Rio - 66 Madrid - 32 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Summer_OlympicsChicago folks pretty much all went for Rio and established its lead from there on. and Tokyo also in the 3rd round went mostly for Rio.
|
Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:09 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I'm not shocked that Rio won. I'm shocked that Chicago was eliminated first.
This leaves the door open for an easy Winter games win for a US City they want it in 2018, or will they wait to bid again for the summer games in 2020 (with competition likely coming from Cape Town and Rome)?
Congratulations to Rio, it will definitely be a very energetic games. Still not a huge fan of the ceremonies taking place in a different stadium than the athletics competition, but that can be easily overlooked.
|
Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:44 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
AgentX wrote: I'm not shocked that Rio won. I'm shocked that Chicago was eliminated first.
This leaves the door open for an easy Winter games win for a US City they want it in 2018, or will they wait to bid again for the summer games in 2020 (with competition likely coming from Cape Town and Rome)?
Congratulations to Rio, it will definitely be a very energetic games. Still not a huge fan of the ceremonies taking place in a different stadium than the athletics competition, but that can be easily overlooked. I'd say 2020. I am not sure about Cape Town getting. South Africa has more problems than Brazil. Right now the cities up for are Boston, Denver, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Birmingham (now WTF are they on there), and New York again. I think Denver makes the most sense, although part of me would love to see Boston get it.
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:39 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Wow....Madrid got quite far.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:41 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Dr. Lecter wrote: Wow....Madrid got quite far. The white factor.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:43 am |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Chip Munkington wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Wow....Madrid got quite far. The white factor. The Samaranch factor
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:06 am |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Jedi Master Carr wrote: I'd say 2020. I am not sure about Cape Town getting. South Africa has more problems than Brazil. Right now the cities up for are Boston, Denver, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Birmingham (now WTF are they on there), and New York again. I think Denver makes the most sense, although part of me would love to see Boston get it. I've heard more discussion about Boston being the candidate city for the USOC in 2020 if they decide to go for it than for any other one. Denver I've heard about, but for a potential 2018 Winter Olympic Games bid. Cape Town is not Rio de Janeiro and if they bid again, they most likely will not be in as good a position as Rio was this time. However the IOC loves breaking into new territory and with a strong bid, a good display of organization from the WC in 2010, and a weak competitor field for 2020, I can see Cape Town having a good showing. By 2032 they will get them.
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:52 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I don't think Boston could handle the Olympics.
Nor would it be a good idea.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:30 am |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Chip Munkington wrote: I don't think Boston could handle the Olympics.
Nor would it be a good idea. I think Boston could, they would have to spread things out to Providence, Foxboro, Worcester, etc but it is doable. What I heard about Denver is they pulled out of 2018 Winter and are thinking about Summer.
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:36 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Pyeongchang shouldn't have much trouble getting the 2018 Winter after two consecutive heartbreaks.
If Toronto bids for 2020 as expected, I don't USOC will counter it with a city of our own to split the votes, as Toronto stands an excellent chance of getting it considering its strong showing in the 2008 bid, and the competition elsewhere is also pretty strong with Rome and Delhi. I will have a better feeling of Capetown's chance after the 2010 World Cup.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:57 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
 Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
xiayun wrote: Pyeongchang shouldn't have much trouble getting the 2018 Winter after two consecutive heartbreaks. Competition looks to be Annecy, France; Munich, Germany, and I keep on hearing about a bid from possibly Harbin or Changchun, China. Zaragoza, Spain is also contemplating a bid. It would be the best time for Pyeongchang to win, third time bidding, 10 years since last Asian games. One thing might hold the IOC back, past world cup and world championship events in that region have been horribly attended and may not instill confidence in the area's organization and enthusiasm, yes I know the Olympics are completely different, but I imagine they'd weight that in their decision. xiayun wrote: If Toronto bids for 2020 as expected, I don't USOC will counter it with a city of our own to split the votes, as Toronto stands an excellent chance of getting it considering its strong showing in the 2008 bid, and the competition elsewhere is also pretty strong with Rome and Delhi. I will have a better feeling of Capetown's chance after the 2010 World Cup. I am not sure Toronto will bid, maybe if it doesn't get the Pan-Am Games in 2015, but if it does, I'm not sure if the IOC would give the games to a country that's already busy organizing a junior olympics if you will. Also it would only be 10 years after Vancouver 2010, and it's hard to imagine the IOC giving a country the population of Canada, 4 Olympic games in the span of 44 years. 2028-2032 probably the best shot for a Toronto bid. Delhi, must see how their organization of the 2010 Commonwealth Games before an Olympic bid is contemplated.
|
Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:13 pm |
|
|