Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 3:47 am



Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
They deserve it, should be a big party in 2016.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:53 pm
Profile WWW
Gamaur's sex slave
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
CONGRATULATIONS TO RIO!
:thumbsup:

66 vs 32 votes. They won by a landslide.

_________________
Image


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:54 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Congrats Rio. Going to a fun and hot Olympics.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:27 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
First round:

Madrid - 28
Rio - 26
Tokyo - 21
Chicago - 18

Second round:
Rio - 46
Madrid - 29
Tokyo - 20

Third round:
Rio - 66
Madrid - 32

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Summer_Olympics

Chicago folks pretty much all went for Rio and established its lead from there on.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:45 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 8684
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
xiayun wrote:
First round:

Madrid - 28
Rio - 26
Tokyo - 21
Chicago - 18

Second round:
Rio - 46
Madrid - 29
Tokyo - 20

Third round:
Rio - 66
Madrid - 32

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Summer_Olympics

Chicago folks pretty much all went for Rio and established its lead from there on.


and Tokyo also in the 3rd round went mostly for Rio.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:09 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I'm not shocked that Rio won. I'm shocked that Chicago was eliminated first.

This leaves the door open for an easy Winter games win for a US City they want it in 2018, or will they wait to bid again for the summer games in 2020 (with competition likely coming from Cape Town and Rome)?

Congratulations to Rio, it will definitely be a very energetic games. Still not a huge fan of the ceremonies taking place in a different stadium than the athletics competition, but that can be easily overlooked.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:44 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
AgentX wrote:
I'm not shocked that Rio won. I'm shocked that Chicago was eliminated first.

This leaves the door open for an easy Winter games win for a US City they want it in 2018, or will they wait to bid again for the summer games in 2020 (with competition likely coming from Cape Town and Rome)?

Congratulations to Rio, it will definitely be a very energetic games. Still not a huge fan of the ceremonies taking place in a different stadium than the athletics competition, but that can be easily overlooked.


I'd say 2020. I am not sure about Cape Town getting. South Africa has more problems than Brazil. Right now the cities up for are Boston, Denver, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Birmingham (now WTF are they on there), and New York again. I think Denver makes the most sense, although part of me would love to see Boston get it.


Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:39 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Wow....Madrid got quite far.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:41 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Wow....Madrid got quite far.


The white factor.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:43 am
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Chip Munkington wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Wow....Madrid got quite far.


The white factor.


The Samaranch factor


Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:06 am
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
I'd say 2020. I am not sure about Cape Town getting. South Africa has more problems than Brazil. Right now the cities up for are Boston, Denver, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Birmingham (now WTF are they on there), and New York again. I think Denver makes the most sense, although part of me would love to see Boston get it.

I've heard more discussion about Boston being the candidate city for the USOC in 2020 if they decide to go for it than for any other one. Denver I've heard about, but for a potential 2018 Winter Olympic Games bid.

Cape Town is not Rio de Janeiro and if they bid again, they most likely will not be in as good a position as Rio was this time. However the IOC loves breaking into new territory and with a strong bid, a good display of organization from the WC in 2010, and a weak competitor field for 2020, I can see Cape Town having a good showing. By 2032 they will get them.


Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:52 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I don't think Boston could handle the Olympics.

Nor would it be a good idea.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:30 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Chip Munkington wrote:
I don't think Boston could handle the Olympics.

Nor would it be a good idea.


I think Boston could, they would have to spread things out to Providence, Foxboro, Worcester, etc but it is doable. What I heard about Denver is they pulled out of 2018 Winter and are thinking about Summer.


Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:36 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Pyeongchang shouldn't have much trouble getting the 2018 Winter after two consecutive heartbreaks.

If Toronto bids for 2020 as expected, I don't USOC will counter it with a city of our own to split the votes, as Toronto stands an excellent chance of getting it considering its strong showing in the 2008 bid, and the competition elsewhere is also pretty strong with Rome and Delhi. I will have a better feeling of Capetown's chance after the 2010 World Cup.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:57 pm
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
xiayun wrote:
Pyeongchang shouldn't have much trouble getting the 2018 Winter after two consecutive heartbreaks.


Competition looks to be Annecy, France; Munich, Germany, and I keep on hearing about a bid from possibly Harbin or Changchun, China. Zaragoza, Spain is also contemplating a bid. It would be the best time for Pyeongchang to win, third time bidding, 10 years since last Asian games. One thing might hold the IOC back, past world cup and world championship events in that region have been horribly attended and may not instill confidence in the area's organization and enthusiasm, yes I know the Olympics are completely different, but I imagine they'd weight that in their decision.

xiayun wrote:
If Toronto bids for 2020 as expected, I don't USOC will counter it with a city of our own to split the votes, as Toronto stands an excellent chance of getting it considering its strong showing in the 2008 bid, and the competition elsewhere is also pretty strong with Rome and Delhi. I will have a better feeling of Capetown's chance after the 2010 World Cup.

I am not sure Toronto will bid, maybe if it doesn't get the Pan-Am Games in 2015, but if it does, I'm not sure if the IOC would give the games to a country that's already busy organizing a junior olympics if you will. Also it would only be 10 years after Vancouver 2010, and it's hard to imagine the IOC giving a country the population of Canada, 4 Olympic games in the span of 44 years. 2028-2032 probably the best shot for a Toronto bid.

Delhi, must see how their organization of the 2010 Commonwealth Games before an Olympic bid is contemplated.


Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:13 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.