On Friday October 2, the IOC will award the 31st Olympiad in 2016 to one of four candidate cities. The process has been going on for more than two years and culminates with the host city announcement at 12:30pm EDT.
Chicago, Tokyo, Rio de Janeiro, and Madrid will each have an opportunity to make a final presentation before the vote and answer questions from the IOC. Presentations begin with Chicago at 2:30am EDT, followed by Tokyo at 4:25am, Rio de Janeiro at 6:05am, and Madrid at 8:45am.
Here is an article giving a general view of the situation.
The general consensus is that it is between Chicago and Rio de Janeiro, with the Brazilian city having the momentum leading up to the vote. It is highly unlikely that there will be a winner in the first two rounds so it looks to be the fourth straight final ballot decision for the IOC.
_________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:18 pm
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I am rooting for the outsider - Madrid.
But more likely Rio will get it.
_________________ The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
I wonder if Madrid will surprise again, like it did in 2005 when it was just two votes shy of tying Paris in the third round, and actually led voting in the second round. With former President J.A. Samaranch showing up and lobbying on it's behalf, I can certainly see a better than anticipated vote count for it.
Ultimately I see Rio beating Chicago in the final round by a handful of votes.
Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:29 pm
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32634 Location: the last free city
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
it'll be 20 years since Atlanta rooting for Chicago
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:50 pm
Price
Gamaur's sex slave
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm Posts: 8889 Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I do really hope it's not Madrid. With the state of the economy as it is right now, that would be a waste of money.
I don't mind any of the other cities, although I don't know if Brazil can support two big and costly events (if I'm not mistaken the World Cup in 2014 is in Brazil too) in such a small amount of time.
I do really hope it's not Madrid. With the state of the economy as it is right now, that would be a waste of money.
I don't mind any of the other cities, although I don't know if Brazil can support two big and costly events (if I'm not mistaken the World Cup in 2014 is in Brazil too) in such a small amount of time.
It would be quite the 9 year span of sporting events for Brazil if they do get it. The Pan Am Games in 07 (which was to prove to the world that they could organize a large sporting gathering), the '14 WC and potentially the '16 Olympics.
I think I'd prefer Rio now since I've learned that South America has never held the games before.
_________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:06 pm
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
AgentX wrote:
The general consensus is that it is between Chicago and Rio de Janeiro, with the Brazilian city having the momentum leading up to the vote. It is highly unlikely that there will be a winner in the first two rounds so it looks to be the fourth straight final ballot decision for the IOC.
Didn't Beijing win in the second round?
Ah, you are counting Winter Games too.
_________________ Recent watched movies:
American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-
The general consensus is that it is between Chicago and Rio de Janeiro, with the Brazilian city having the momentum leading up to the vote. It is highly unlikely that there will be a winner in the first two rounds so it looks to be the fourth straight final ballot decision for the IOC.
Didn't Beijing win in the second round?
Ah, you are counting Winter Games too.
Beijing and Salt Lake City won on the second round of voting. Every other decision since the one for the 1992 Barcelona games went to a final round.
Chicago is still the odds on favourite, money was going to Rio before Obama announced he'd make the trip, now it seems Chicago has broken Rio's momentum.
Chicago's presentation was good, Michelle and Barack were the highlights. Tokyo's was efficient, nothing really spectacular but nothing worthy of great criticism. Rio de Janeiro's played up the passion and the breakthrough opportunities that a games in South American would present, expected but effective. Madrid's was probably the best, Samaranch went with the whole 'Give the games to Madrid before I die, which could be risky...'
Betting has also firmed up with Chicago and Rio, with Chicago still the favourite at betfair offering 2.18 to 2, while Rio is 2.3 to 2 (If I'm reading their odd structure correct . Going to be an interesting voting round. Tokyo should be out first, but after that, I wouldn't put it past Madrid surviving the second round after it's presentation.
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element
trixster wrote:
chippy is correct
Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump
Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:32 am
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Go Rio! I love when American cities are eliminated from the Olympics.
Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:36 am
Price
Gamaur's sex slave
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm Posts: 8889 Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Chip Munkington wrote:
CHICAGO ELIMINATED IN FIRST ROUND!!!
Jimmy Carter will say the fault belongs to those racist bastards at the IOC.
_________________
Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:09 pm
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Rio is going to get it. I think what happened was simple Rio won most of the Americas vote, got Africa and a a few other areas. Madrid and Tokyo survived as long as they did because they won their regional areas vote.
Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:23 pm
Grill
Forum General
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am Posts: 8684
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
same thread in 2 places...couldn't one have just been closed and referenced to the other one...so here goes again....
watching the Chicago news and the newscasters are shocked that they were the first city elimanted today which they thought they could have been selected for the olympics.
Think it is now between Rio and Madrid.
Anyway, Obama and Oprah made a big push for Chicago that failed very fast.
Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:25 pm
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I copied it to the water cooler thread as I think the event deserves more exposure than just for sports fans. It's true that I could've just link it back.
_________________ Recent watched movies:
American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum