Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 10:48 am



Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision 
Author Message
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
On Friday October 2, the IOC will award the 31st Olympiad in 2016 to one of four candidate cities. The process has been going on for more than two years and culminates with the host city announcement at 12:30pm EDT.

Chicago, Tokyo, Rio de Janeiro, and Madrid will each have an opportunity to make a final presentation before the vote and answer questions from the IOC. Presentations begin with Chicago at 2:30am EDT, followed by Tokyo at 4:25am, Rio de Janeiro at 6:05am, and Madrid at 8:45am.

Here is an article giving a general view of the situation.

The general consensus is that it is between Chicago and Rio de Janeiro, with the Brazilian city having the momentum leading up to the vote. It is highly unlikely that there will be a winner in the first two rounds so it looks to be the fourth straight final ballot decision for the IOC.


Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:36 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I wouldn't mind seeing Chicago get it.

_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN

45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm


Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:18 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I am rooting for the outsider - Madrid.

But more likely Rio will get it.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:21 pm
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I wonder if Madrid will surprise again, like it did in 2005 when it was just two votes shy of tying Paris in the third round, and actually led voting in the second round. With former President J.A. Samaranch showing up and lobbying on it's behalf, I can certainly see a better than anticipated vote count for it.

Ultimately I see Rio beating Chicago in the final round by a handful of votes.


Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:29 pm
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32633
Location: the last free city
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
it'll be 20 years since Atlanta :cheer: rooting for Chicago :cheer:

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:50 pm
Profile
Gamaur's sex slave
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I do really hope it's not Madrid. With the state of the economy as it is right now, that would be a waste of money.

I don't mind any of the other cities, although I don't know if Brazil can support two big and costly events (if I'm not mistaken the World Cup in 2014 is in Brazil too) in such a small amount of time.

_________________
Image


Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:49 am
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Price wrote:
I do really hope it's not Madrid. With the state of the economy as it is right now, that would be a waste of money.

I don't mind any of the other cities, although I don't know if Brazil can support two big and costly events (if I'm not mistaken the World Cup in 2014 is in Brazil too) in such a small amount of time.


It would be quite the 9 year span of sporting events for Brazil if they do get it. The Pan Am Games in 07 (which was to prove to the world that they could organize a large sporting gathering), the '14 WC and potentially the '16 Olympics.

Their plan seems solid:


Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:21 pm
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Brief run down of how IOC voting goes. I don't think WGN will be showing the proceedings starting at 2:30 AM EDT so it looks like the internet for me!

And to get myself in the spirit, some videos of previous announcements:

Atlanta 1996:

Nagano 1998:

Sydney 2000:

Athens 2004:

Beijing 2008:

London 2012:

Sochi 2014:


Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:55 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I think I'd prefer Rio now since I've learned that South America has never held the games before.

_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN

45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm


Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:06 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
AgentX wrote:
The general consensus is that it is between Chicago and Rio de Janeiro, with the Brazilian city having the momentum leading up to the vote. It is highly unlikely that there will be a winner in the first two rounds so it looks to be the fourth straight final ballot decision for the IOC.


Didn't Beijing win in the second round?

Ah, you are counting Winter Games too.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:22 am
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
xiayun wrote:
AgentX wrote:
The general consensus is that it is between Chicago and Rio de Janeiro, with the Brazilian city having the momentum leading up to the vote. It is highly unlikely that there will be a winner in the first two rounds so it looks to be the fourth straight final ballot decision for the IOC.


Didn't Beijing win in the second round?

Ah, you are counting Winter Games too.


Beijing and Salt Lake City won on the second round of voting. Every other decision since the one for the 1992 Barcelona games went to a final round.

Chicago is still the odds on favourite, money was going to Rio before Obama announced he'd make the trip, now it seems Chicago has broken Rio's momentum.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:40 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
GO RIO, GO!

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:57 am
Profile
The Original
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am
Posts: 9808
Location: Suisse
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I think its gonna be Tokyo

_________________
Libs wrote:
FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:33 am
Profile
Gamaur's sex slave
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
In order of preference:

Rio
Tokyo
Chicago
Madrid

_________________
Image


Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:17 am
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Posts: 2303
Location: 905
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Chicago's presentation was good, Michelle and Barack were the highlights.
Tokyo's was efficient, nothing really spectacular but nothing worthy of great criticism.
Rio de Janeiro's played up the passion and the breakthrough opportunities that a games in South American would present, expected but effective.
Madrid's was probably the best, Samaranch went with the whole 'Give the games to Madrid before I die, which could be risky...'

Betting has also firmed up with Chicago and Rio, with Chicago still the favourite at betfair offering 2.18 to 2, while Rio is 2.3 to 2 (If I'm reading their odd structure correct . Going to be an interesting voting round. Tokyo should be out first, but after that, I wouldn't put it past Madrid surviving the second round after it's presentation.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:46 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
CHICAGO ELIMINATED IN FIRST ROUND!!!

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:30 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Tokyo eliminated as well.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:32 am
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Go Rio! I love when American cities are eliminated from the Olympics.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:36 am
Profile WWW
Gamaur's sex slave
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Chip Munkington wrote:
CHICAGO ELIMINATED IN FIRST ROUND!!!


Jimmy Carter will say the fault belongs to those racist bastards at the IOC.

_________________
Image


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:09 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Rio is going to get it. I think what happened was simple Rio won most of the Americas vote, got Africa and a a few other areas. Madrid and Tokyo survived as long as they did because they won their regional areas vote.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:23 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 8684
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
same thread in 2 places...couldn't one have just been closed and referenced to the other one...so here goes again....

watching the Chicago news and the newscasters are shocked that they were the first city elimanted today which they thought they could have been selected for the olympics.

Think it is now between Rio and Madrid.

Anyway, Obama and Oprah made a big push for Chicago that failed very fast.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:25 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
I copied it to the water cooler thread as I think the event deserves more exposure than just for sports fans. It's true that I could've just link it back.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:29 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
That was a slap to the face for Obama. Wow!

If Madrid wins it just shows that Mr. Corrupcy, Samaranch still is playing everybody


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:38 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
Levy wrote:
That was a slap to the face for Obama. Wow!

If Madrid wins it just shows that Mr. Corrupcy, Samaranch still is playing everybody


It will show the IOC is very corrupt. Hopefully Rio wins and then at least give it to a nation that deserves it.


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:47 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 121 IOC Session - 2016 Decision
RIO


Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:50 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.