|
|
|
|
The states that are allowing gay marriage thread
Author |
Message |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: The states that are allowing gay marriage thread
its
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:35 am |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
 Re: The states that are allowing gay marriage thread
You capitalize like you're texting.
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:58 am |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: The states that are allowing gay marriage thread
Skyblade wrote: I think it's holding out for two reasons; 1) A very heavy Catholic population, and 2) The state recognizes gay marriages from out of state and it's a very tiny state. So small, that at the end of the nineties, we regularly went out of state for Christmas shopping or seeing movies. Unless you're intent on marrying in your childhood home or in scenic Newport, you can work around the system with a drive that's considered worth two percentage points of sales tax. Obviously, it'll still be fought for, but it's probably not seen as a pragmatic battleground, unless claiming all of New England is that important a symbolic victory. I read that it is pretty much only because of their Governor, and not much else. So it'll hop over after his term limit is up. And yes, I am pretty sure the symbolic victory of claiming all of New England is exactly why its a big deal, even though its a small state. It would be a cohesive geographic and population block with a shared identity. Iowa really broke the mold, but I feel with the New england thing, people keep forgetting about it.
|
Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:32 am |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
 Re: The states that are allowing gay marriage thread
dolcevita wrote: Skyblade wrote: I think it's holding out for two reasons; 1) A very heavy Catholic population, and 2) The state recognizes gay marriages from out of state and it's a very tiny state. So small, that at the end of the nineties, we regularly went out of state for Christmas shopping or seeing movies. Unless you're intent on marrying in your childhood home or in scenic Newport, you can work around the system with a drive that's considered worth two percentage points of sales tax. Obviously, it'll still be fought for, but it's probably not seen as a pragmatic battleground, unless claiming all of New England is that important a symbolic victory. I read that it is pretty much only because of their Governor, and not much else. So it'll hop over after his term limit is up. And yes, I am pretty sure the symbolic victory of claiming all of New England is exactly why its a big deal, even though its a small state. It would be a cohesive geographic and population block with a shared identity. Iowa really broke the mold, but I feel with the New england thing, people keep forgetting about it. Exactly, activists want NE to be a "showcase" of gay marriage to help get it spread across the country. The problem is once you get past there and a few states out west, most of the Midwest and Bible Belt have constitutional amendments prohibiting gay marriage and those will be much harder to overturn.
_________________ See above.
|
Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:29 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|