Author |
Message |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Porn is for the benefit of society.
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:22 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Hey, now I want to rent it. Two things I like: pirates and porn!
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Mon Apr 06, 2009 11:37 am |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Magnus wrote: Also, the idea that we're "using tax payers money" to show this is kind of flawed considring that it cost us NOTHING to show this (even the DVD was free) and we were going to get close to $3,000 for this which would have just gone back to the university since that's where all our money goes.
This whole thing has just pissed me off. It angers me that politcians can just bully organizations to do what they want without any sort of debate. We literally had no chance to even argue our case. It's just complete bullshit.
So why not have the university refuse the government funding and fund the university by running a XXX theater?
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:05 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Oy vey Krem.
If the government isn't funding the film -- and it truly costs nothing to bring the film to the theatre -- why does it matter if they screen it? For the university AND the government, it's a win-win situation. The university reinvests in itself with any profit generated (outside of Magnus' wages). And that's money the government doesn't have to invest into the university and can use for other things...like building a Purple Line!
Seems silly to me. We shouldn't be preventing public institutions from covering their costs from within. Given the economic situation...that's desirable.
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:10 pm |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
da torri wrote: Oy vey Krem.
If the government isn't funding the film -- and it truly costs nothing to bring the film to the theatre -- why does it matter if they screen it? For the university AND the government, it's a win-win situation. The university reinvests in itself with any profit generated (outside of Magnus' wages). And that's money the government doesn't have to invest into the university and can use for other things...like building a Purple Line!
Seems silly to me. We shouldn't be preventing public institutions from covering their costs from within. Given the economic situation...that's desirable. You seem to be operating under assumption that when the government gives the money to anyone it does so with no strings attached. As recent developments on both Wall Street and and the Big 3 have shown, that is hardly ever the case. If you make a deal with the devil, you need to understand that he may change the rules on you any time.
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:28 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Sorry, Krem's right.
If you don't want the puppeteer's strings, you don't take the money. If this were a privately owned and operated theater it'd be one thing, but it was founded and is backed by public taxpayer money. That leaves you at the mercy of your local political morons, and they decided to make a moral statement with your theater.
Your best recourse is to scream as loudly as you can, contact local papers, and make sure his constituents know what he did, but beware, they do this stuff for a reason, and it's not because it costs them votes. For every 1 of you, there are 5 more that think it was a grand idea.
_________________
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:14 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
But it did happen, so stop crying over spilled milk and accept that this is one of the realities of a governmentally backed institution. Not everything in life works out the way you want it to, and it sure as hell isn't always fair.
_________________
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:31 pm |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Magnus wrote: Deal with the devil? Yeah, the devil. Magnus wrote: Yes, the university is funded by the state but the state does not run the university. The university does not go through the state for approval or disapproval except for major things like building a new school or something. But micro-level stuff like the theater? The state has NEVER been involved. By the state doing this, you're opening up the idea that the state can control the university, which would just be a disaster. Of course they can control the university. Even if they can't do it by directly issuing orders, as you saw, they can dangle the carrot of the public money. There are many examples like yours. Did you know that the legal drinking age in the U.S. is not mandated by the federal law? The federal government can't actually interfere with the states like that. Instead, Congress passed a law that withheld a portion of the highway funding from states that didn't pass a law that made 21 the minimum drinking age. Clever, huh? Magnus wrote: Again, it's not like this hasn't been done before. We showed Deep Throat just four years ago. The reason why this time it's an issue is because some Republican senators who are scared about re-relection wanted to abuse their powers to make a PR move to help their image. Last I checked, Maryland politics was dominated by Democrats. Not that it matters much, anyway. Magnus wrote: Also, why should the entire university suffer? The justification for cutting funding to EVERYONE makes no sense. I'd understand this a bit more if they threatened to shut the theater down, but the entire university? You already said that the government succeeded in what it was trying to accomplish. Why would you say that the way they went about it made no sense?
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:19 pm |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
And yet you act surprised when the government bullies you and your theater buddies.
Hey, I'm bullied by the government too. Someone in it decided to provide University of Maryland with public funds, yet never asked me if I was OK with it.
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:28 pm |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Porn, taxpayer money, rebellious students.
That's fucking gold as far as local news is concerned. Too bad ruffies wasn't involved.
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:39 pm |
|
 |
Tuukka
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:35 am Posts: 1830 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Excuse me, but what the fuck are you people talking about? I mean almost everyone else but Magnus.
YOU bitch EVERY TIME politicians do things you don't like, and now as Magnus does the same, you just go "Oh, you just gotta live with it! That's how the world spins around!". I mean, what the fuck? Is that supposed to make sense somehow?
Politicians run their game with OUR money, so they respond to US. We can bitch and complain about their exactly as much we want. And contrary to what some people apparently think, politicians DON'T finance Magnus university. TAXPAYERS do. The same people who also pay the salaries to the aforementioned politicians.
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:39 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Tuukka wrote: Excuse me, but what the fuck are you people talking about? I mean almost everyone else but Magnus.
YOU bitch EVERY TIME politicians do things you don't like, and now as Magnus does the same, you just go "Oh, you just gotta live with it! That's how the world spins around!". I mean, what the fuck? Is that supposed to make sense somehow?
Politicians run their game with OUR money, so they respond to US. We can bitch and complain about their exactly as much we want. And contrary to what some people apparently think, politicians DON'T finance Magnus university. TAXPAYERS do. The same people who also pay the salaries to the aforementioned politicians. I think Krem's point was the if you want to show the movie, go show it at a non-subsidized theater, that way you don't have to comply [as much] with government regulations and interference.
|
Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:45 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Caius wrote: Tuukka wrote: Excuse me, but what the fuck are you people talking about? I mean almost everyone else but Magnus.
YOU bitch EVERY TIME politicians do things you don't like, and now as Magnus does the same, you just go "Oh, you just gotta live with it! That's how the world spins around!". I mean, what the fuck? Is that supposed to make sense somehow?
Politicians run their game with OUR money, so they respond to US. We can bitch and complain about their exactly as much we want. And contrary to what some people apparently think, politicians DON'T finance Magnus university. TAXPAYERS do. The same people who also pay the salaries to the aforementioned politicians. I think Krem's point was the if you want to show the movie, go show it at a non-subsidized theater, that way you don't have to comply [as much] with government regulations and interference. Ding, Ding, Ding!
_________________
|
Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:32 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Magnus makes perfect sense, you lot going down the government devil route are being silly. This would never happen in an Irish University and they are funded by the government. And saying a University should be run without money from the taxpayer is a non starter. Yes lets have each class start with a plug for Pepsi Cola.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:54 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
well magnus, your pleas made it to cnn.
|
Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:09 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
What stupid headline did they use?
Porn tries to save Baby politician stops it?
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:11 am |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Gulli wrote: Magnus makes perfect sense, you lot going down the government devil route are being silly. This would never happen in an Irish University and they are funded by the government. And saying a University should be run without money from the taxpayer is a non starter. Yes lets have each class start with a plug for Pepsi Cola. The movie was shown, or at least part of it including money shots. Funny you make that Pepsi point when Pirates II was an issue here because it was part of a marketing push by Digital Playground, the company that produced the movie. They passed out free copies to colleges across the country. I am sure they wanted the free controversy.
|
Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:25 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
 Re: Maryland politcans refuse to let porn screening at college
Magnus wrote: bABA wrote: well magnus, your pleas made it to cnn. You mean this? http://www.time.com/time/nation/article ... 21,00.htmlAt this point, I'm actually sick of it. I was frustrated when I started this thread but now it's just gone out of control. No one knows what the hell they're talking about, and the ones that do (the theater) aren't allowed to speak. The "real" first amendment fight is the fact that anyone apart of the theater cannot speak or they will be fired. I mean, I understand why they do it...it's just bullshit. You have something like this with hundreds of people without a clue talking about it and then the people who know what's going on can't speak. And yes, a student group did have a screening of the film in a classroom, but let's get the facts straight on that: The "student group" that did that is really a political party who is running for SGA election (which just so happen to be this week) and it just so happen to be that this party was looking to get their ass kicked before this whole thing. Also, they didn't show the whole thing, just like twenty minutes. I hate this group even more because like the state senators, they made an issue out of this just for PR. Funny thing is that if a student group had tried to show the porn at the Hoff and charge money, the state could not do a thing because student groups are protected. Yet in that case, the state only loses money because they have to pay for the theater employee salaries during the filming while they recieve none of the ticket revenue. So if porn is going to be shown, the best scenario for the state is to let the theater show it...yet it's only in this scenario that the state can "legally" stop the screening. As I said, we were showing this film because we thought it'd be a good way to get some easy money and because we thought it'd be stupid fun. The people who were going to watch the porn were people who were going BECAUSE it was supposed to be stupid fun. If anyone actually wanted to jack off, they'd just download it for free. It was supposed to be silly and now it's become silly but in a whole another way. actually, they had a video up before.
|
Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:12 pm |
|
|