Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 1:38 pm



Reply to topic  [ 199 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
 Super Bowl Picks/Talk-Philly Eagles and New England Patriots 

Who are you rooting for in the Super Bowl?
Eagles 29%  29%  [ 8 ]
Patroits 50%  50%  [ 14 ]
Don't care - I don't like either of these teams. 11%  11%  [ 3 ]
Don't care - I am not a NFL Football fan 11%  11%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 28

 Super Bowl Picks/Talk-Philly Eagles and New England Patriots 
Author Message
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Posts: 7286
Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
Post Super Bowl Picks/Talk-Philly Eagles and New England Patriots
What do you think of the upcoming Eagles and New England Super Bowl?

_________________
*
WARNING*****GOLDIE POSTING****WARNING
**
COVER YOUR EYES
***
HIDE YOUR WOMEN & CHILDREN
****
HIT THE IGNORE BUTTON
*****
BUT REMEMBER*****GOLDIE*****ALWAYS KNOWS THE RIGHT/BETTER ANSWER
******
THIS HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT BROUGHT TO YOU BY GOLDIE
*******


Last edited by Goldie on Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:55 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
If the Eagles play at the Superbowl like they did today, and if they have T.O. catchin' that ball, they will win the Superbowl. The Patriots are a great team, but it looks to be the Eagles year.

I hope for the sake of the Superbowl itself that the Pats don't win. It's getting old now. :razz:


Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:58 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post 
Zingaling, how come you don't appreciate greatness? Why do you want to see the best be knocked down?

Anyway, Patriots will win this game. Tom Brady is not Michael Vick. Brady is calm under pressure and can actually throw the ball. Dillion will be enough to put them over the top.


Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:05 pm
Profile WWW
I'm Batman

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm
Posts: 5554
Location: Long Island
Post 
It's not gonna be close. Pats in a landslide. If they score 41 against the best defense in football...well...I'd be scared.


Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:36 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
Well, let's see... first lets keep the highest scoring offence to a measly 3 points, then we'll score 41 points against the best defence... what shall we do next? Break the spines of the Eagles? I think so :)

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:41 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
I hope the Eagles win. That would be awesome for Mcnabb & Co. It wouldn't hurt my feelings if the Patriots won. Bill Bellicek is the best coach in football.

Some racist moron couple of years ago said that McNabb was no good and the reason he was being praised was because he was black. I am pretty sure that moron is shit faced now :razz:

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:46 pm
Profile WWW
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post 
jb007 wrote:
Some racist moron couple of years ago said that McNabb was no good and the reason he was being praised was because he was black. I am pretty sure that moron is shit faced now :razz:


As it turns out, Rush Limbaugh was probably shitfaced while he made those comments.

Anyways, as for the game in two weeks, i'm pretty much feeling the same way ChipMunky is. If we can hold the Colts to only three points, and beat the Steelers by 14 (Really 21, on the last touchdown, no one was playing defense) who have the best defense in the NFL, you have to feel very comfortable if you are a Patriots fan. Who have the Eagles played that make up step back and become impressed with what they have done? The Vikings and the Falcons? WOW! Check that. Who did they play during the Regular Season (And beat) that would make someone impressed with the Eagles?

Also, it helps a lot that most of this Patriots team has been there twice before, while very few on the Eagles have been there at all.

Who knows what will happen between now and February 6th, but the Patriots will have Richard Seymour back along with probably Patrick Pass. Unless T.O. can play defense too, like Troy Brown, I don't think the Eagles can win this game.

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:03 am
Profile WWW
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
I agree with most of you that New England looks damn good to win it all again. They would be the first dynasty in the salary cap era. In fact I would say they already are a dynasty :-k

So Jmart, you couldn't ask for a better year in sports, huh?

Red Sox win, Patriots are probably gonna win again after having won last year. Too bad Celtics suck, otherwise a winning trifecta. As for NHL, RIP.

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:09 am
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Posts: 7286
Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
Post 
So far no love for Philly so is there any chance TO is going to play for Philly.

_________________
*
WARNING*****GOLDIE POSTING****WARNING
**
COVER YOUR EYES
***
HIDE YOUR WOMEN & CHILDREN
****
HIT THE IGNORE BUTTON
*****
BUT REMEMBER*****GOLDIE*****ALWAYS KNOWS THE RIGHT/BETTER ANSWER
******
THIS HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT BROUGHT TO YOU BY GOLDIE
*******


Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:31 am
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32634
Location: the last free city
Post 
Even though i hate both teams :mad: i'm rooting for McNabb (eagles).
I like him the most out of all the players in the big game.

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:02 pm
Profile
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
i really dont want the Patriots to have another win, im rooting for the Eagles, ........but, i have a feeling the pats will get the win! :mad:


Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:05 pm
Profile
I'm Batman

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm
Posts: 5554
Location: Long Island
Post 
Well here's another injury for the Eagles.

ESPNews reports Philadelphia Eagles TE Chad Lewis (foot) suffered a foot injury Sunday, Jan. 23, and will have surgery Wednesday, Jan. 26. He will not be able to play during the Super Bowl against the New England Patriots.

They gonna get crushed.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:13 pm
Profile
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post 
jb007 wrote:
I agree with most of you that New England looks damn good to win it all again. They would be the first dynasty in the salary cap era. In fact I would say they already are a dynasty :-k

So Jmart, you couldn't ask for a better year in sports, huh?

Red Sox win, Patriots are probably gonna win again after having won last year. Too bad Celtics suck, otherwise a winning trifecta. As for NHL, RIP.


Yes, I don't think any year could get realistically better than this one was for Boston sports fans. The only other year that had the potential to be better than this one, was 1986 when the Patriots, Celtics and Red Sox all went to their respective sports championship games, with only the Celtics winning their championship. However, if the Patriots win this year, it will definetly cap off one hell of a year.

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:19 pm
Profile WWW
life begins now
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post 
Go Eagles!!

I can't stand the thought of the Pat's winning again. ](*,)


Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:27 pm
Profile YIM
Post 
Bunch of New England bandwagon jumpers here.


Eagles all the way!


Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:24 pm
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32634
Location: the last free city
Post 
If the PATS win then that be they are a dynasty :mad: and won 3 out of 4 SB like the Cowboys did in the early '90's.
That's not a good thing so..........GO EAGLES!! :wink:

Season --- mvp ---------- team
2003 Super Bowl XXXVIII - QB Tom Brady, New England

2002 Super Bowl XXXVII - S Dexter Jackson, Tampa Bay

2001 Super Bowl XXXVI - QB Tom Brady, New England

2000 Super Bowl XXXV - LB Ray Lewis, Baltimore

1999 Super Bowl XXXIV - QB Kurt Warner, St. Louis

1998 Super Bowl XXXIII - QB John Elway, Denver

1997 Super Bowl XXXII - RB Terrell Davis, Denver

1996 Super Bowl XXXI - KR Desmond Howard, Green Bay

1995 Super Bowl XXX - CB Larry Brown, Dallas

1994 Super Bowl XXIX - QB Steve Young, San Francisco

1993 Super Bowl XXVIII - RB Emmitt Smith, Dallas

1992 Super Bowl XXVII - QB Troy Aikman, Dallas

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:35 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 12:59 pm
Posts: 262
Location: US
Post 
I think patriots are too hot right now so I give them the win.. I'd just like a good nailbiter.. and I wouldn't be too disappointed either way.

_________________
"For my next miracle, I'll be turning water.. into FUNK!"


Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:56 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Krem wrote:
Bunch of New England bandwagon jumpers here.


Eagles all the way!


'Scuse me? You gotta a problem with that? :mad:

Actually, I was born in PA so could swing either way. I guess it would be cute if the Eagles won too...but only cause of Karl's user name.


Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:17 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
Posts: 270
Post 
Man everyone is talking about how the Patriots are so hot. Yea they are, but they played to completely different games against the two teams they went against.

The Steelers offense is alright at best, and the Colts defense is terrible. So all the Pats had to do was focus on one thing. It will not be the same for the Eagles, who have a powerful offense and one of the best defenses in the league (the best if you ask me, I mean they held the Falcons (best running team in NFL) to under 100 rushing yards).

_________________
Proclaimed King of Loonies!


Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:01 pm
Profile WWW
Angels & Demons

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
Posts: 270
Post 
Man everyone is talking about how the Patriots are so hot. Yea they are, but they played to completely different games against the two teams they went against.

The Steelers offense is alright at best, and the Colts defense is terrible. So all the Pats had to do was focus on one thing. It will not be the same for the Eagles, who have a powerful offense and one of the best defenses in the league (the best if you ask me, I mean they held the Falcons (best running team in NFL) to under 100 rushing yards).

_________________
Proclaimed King of Loonies!


Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:01 pm
Profile WWW
I'm Batman

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm
Posts: 5554
Location: Long Island
Post 
Pats hold best offense in league to 3 points.
Pats score 41 points against best defense in the league.

Trust me the Pats didn't go in "focusing" on one thing. They are just that damn good.

AND I HATE THE PATS!!


Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:18 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:44 pm
Posts: 270
Post 
Obviously they did. They let the Colts look like a good defense until the 4th quarter, and the Steelers scored 27 points on them.

_________________
Proclaimed King of Loonies!


Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:32 pm
Profile WWW
I'm Batman

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm
Posts: 5554
Location: Long Island
Post 
Steelers really didn't score two of those TDs. Basically they were give away TDs because no one was playing defense. I really don't see the Eagles having a shot.


Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:35 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
The Eagles haven't really played any team this year of New Englands calibur, except Pittsburgh, who in fact CRUSHED them.

Oh and also, Belichec? pretty much could assume who they were going to play against in the playoffs. I gaurantee that he spent the more weeks preparing to beat Pittsburgh than he did for Indy. Now he could probably assume pretty good that Philly was gonna make it in, I mean come on, who do they have to beat? Nobody THAT good. Now if he has been preparing as long as he did for Pitts then there's no way Philly will come close in the game.

Did any of that make sense?

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:09 pm
Profile
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post 
Moviebuf wrote:
Man everyone is talking about how the Patriots are so hot. Yea they are, but they played to completely different games against the two teams they went against.


It's usually not best to start an argument when you are disagreeing with yourself.

Quote:
The Steelers offense is alright at best, and the Colts defense is terrible. So all the Pats had to do was focus on one thing. It will not be the same for the Eagles, who have a powerful offense and one of the best defenses in the league (the best if you ask me, I mean they held the Falcons (best running team in NFL) to under 100 rushing yards).


It's funny that you should mention the two weak factors for both of those teams, but fail to mention why both of those teams made it to the playoffs in the first place.

How exactly did the Patriots have to focus on just one thing with both of those teams? With the Steelers they had to find a way to stop the run. They did that very efficently. To say that the Steelers offense is alright at best, is to short-change them. They had a 15-1 record! On offense they had to figure out a way to score against the best defense in the league (Statistically). They scored 41 points. The Steelers game was an all around blow-out. The only reason why the score was somewhat close in the end, is because the Patriots gave up a garbage touchdown in the final minutes of the game. If the Patriots were actually playing defense on that drive, the final score would've been 41-20.

As for the Colts, everyone was so impressed by the Colts offense, and with the Patriots secondary at the time being somewhat unbalanced, everyone thought (Outside of New England) that the Patriots had no chance to stop them. Not only did they do that, but they held one of the best offensive teams ever, to 3 points. Also, you are short-changing the Colts defense. They improved during the off-season, but obviously not enough for them to win on the road during the playoffs.

The reason why the Patriots are back in the Super Bowl, and have a damn good chance to win it again, is because they are a three dimensional team. They can win in a offensive struggle with the best offensive teams, and they can win in a defensive struggle.

As for the Eagles, they play in the NFC. What impressive teams did they have to win against to advance to the Super Bowl? The Vikings and the Falcons? Notice anything about those two teams? That's right, they're both dome teams, and since neither had home field advantage, they didn't really have a chance in hell to go anywhere in the playoffs. The same can be said with the Colts. Once those teams can get home-field throughout the playoffs, then maybe they can have a chance to go to the Super Bowl.

However, you did catch the two games the Eagles have so far played in the post-season, right? They let the Vikings, and even the Falcons hang around too long, in the Falcons game especially. It was only a 17-10 game in the fourth quarter. They can't afford to do this against the Patriots (I don't think this is going to happen though, because I don't expect the Eagles to ever get a lead in the game).

Anyone else think that their 13-3 record in the regular season, was slightly inflated because they were in the NFC. I mean just look at the Vikings and the Rams. Those were two 8-8 teams that made it to the playoffs. That's pathetic. Not to mention the fact the Eagles lost against the Rams on Monday Night Football.

Also, this whole Terrell Owens thing will probably blow up in the Eagles' faces. I mean, the best thing a team needs is a distraction going into the biggest game they will proably ever play in.

I think overall the Eagles are a good team, and if they were facing any other team except for the Patriots, they would probably win in the Super Bowl. But I just think the Patriots are a better team.

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:49 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 199 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.